Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
kajaktum
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
Just ... write... the function. What is so bad about that? Sure, if you day job is to literally write enums all day then automating that process is worthwhile. But how often do you do this? How much harder is it to just verify the stupid si
62.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
Wait a minute...do you think that your feelings, emotions and thoughts are not reality because they are an experience? What is real to you then? Atoms? Your "intuition" about physics or everything else is an experience too. Experi
63.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
>Right morality maps itself to reality... buuuut man believing irrational things is also 'one such' reality How so? The fact that man believes in irrational things is a reality...How is that controversial? It is real that most
64.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
My running hypothetical scenario is saving acting President of a benevolent superpower vs a baby in a house fire. Saving the baby or "just anyone" is wrong; you should have saved the president instead.
65.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
> The party line is: “Making criminals suffer is, in itself, always bad. The only available moral justification is deterrence: The suffering you save must exceed the suffering you inflict.” Huh? What if the local minima of inflicting som
66.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
This looks good but will come out horrible in practice: 1. This requires so much thought to implement and I don't think the average UX team can implement it. A half ass implementation of this will probably be worse than a simple page w
67.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
Or provide better public transportation?
68.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
> If you don't need to use C++, don't. I have to because everything else is in C++ and I don't want to be the jackass that uses their favorite language that only they know in the company.
69.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
You can do it using whatever you want. I hope I don't discourage you from discovering C++. You might enjoy it, you might not, who cares. Go do it and make up your own opinion.
70.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
I started writing C++ to do some JSON at work and it is absolutely horrible piece of shit language (even with nlohmann's and simdjson). I cannot believe people live like this. between figuring out CMake scripts, std::optional being bas
71.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
Okay, someone tell me why JVM isn't it? Is there something fundamentally flawed in the JVM that can't be fixed?
72.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
Don't worry, there's plenty of masochistic C++ enthusiast to keep all these project going.
73.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
I am curious how that is useful at all? I imagine prototyping and the set of libraries that you have is quite limited compared to something like Python. You're also limiting yourself to a much smaller pool of developers which have to i
74.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
> simple fact that most people using LLMs (in general) are not understanding this. And why does that matter? Plenty of people "use JavaScript without fundamental understanding of the language's inner workings" but things a
75.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
I mean if everyone did drugs but everyone never noticed it then, did they actually use drugs? If there's nothing observable from someone that is supposedly drunk, then who cares?
76.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
> On the contrary “otaku” refers exclusively to those who are into Japanese media but who do not worship Japan, as those are always weeaboo. Huh? I thought people that are obsessed with trains can also be referred to as otakus so it is n
77.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
It's really just an english version of the word "otaku". In the past the word would be "nerd" but for whatever reason the word doesn't capture the same vibe anymore. I personally think its a praise in some circ
78.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
> You mean parents can't seem to tolerate even a single dead child. And that's true, especially when most parents only ever have one or two children. If every parents react the same way then that is effectively the whole societ
79.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
Because the name is a technical claim. Is it fast today? Maybe but will it still be considered "blazing" in 20 years? This is equivalent to naming your thing VeryFastMQ. I can already imagine people saying "Oh yea BlazingMQ i
80.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
Whenever this kind of opinion props up I wonder how far would you let your child to "fail"? Clearly we need our children to stumble and fail in a low-stake environment before they actually experience them later on in life. This na
81.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
I don't doubt that it is fast but please don't name your thing <claim><thing>.
82.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
What people actually need is a diary. I can easily go through a day's worth of work and not remember what I did for that day, what I wanted to do nor what I was thinking about. TODOs is a weird middle ground where you put some effort b
83.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
> C++ promises that you will forever be able to interleave new-style code right into the middle of ancient, battle-tested old-style code. this is a problem, btw AFAIK c++ modernizations are few and rarely successful.
84.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
I am not sure if university is an effective place to do this. I think tricking the younger minds at primary/secondary school to be more curious and well-rounded person is much better. Once you get the ball rolling, they will hopefully
85.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
As opposed to what? Good will of the people to finally figure something out? lol. The only tool we have are incentives. Good luck convincing people "intellectually" or "philosopically" or "logically" to do the
86.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
Sure its good but its a one off script, so who really cares how fast the startup is? Or how elegant it is? I can literally ask LLMs to write a rough working code in seconds and I only need to fix it up a little bit. There's way more r
87.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
Is there enough forces trying to solve this issue? Isn't there a void here for the market to intervene? Why hasn't it? AFAIK agriculture is quite inefficient.
88.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
They can still scrap the website? The fact is that many, many internet businesses today not make sense. Many of them are bleeding money with no possible path to profitability ahead. Mostly due to the fact that people's expectations are
89.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
Not enough scrutiny/blame have been given to the US government. TK is not entirely to blame for his crimes. This is why we should make away with libertarian concept of free-will. If a cow had been poisoned to murder people, no one woul
90.
▲
by
kajaktum
3y ago
HFT provides liquidity and depth to the market tho. It does serve a purpose. How much? Not sure. Does it need to be super duper fast? Not sure. But that is natural in industries like this, because if you don't do it then someone else w
More ›