kahnjw

14 ms·

1. 121.▲
   by kahnjw 9y ago

   Shameless plug: I recently wrote a similar piece exploring pattern matching in Javascript http://jarrodkahn.com/posts/6/slug/
2. 122.▲
   by kahnjw 10y ago

   Also, I'm not defending the plane. Obviously it has many problems, I'm merely pointing out that its use profile is different than the F22, and the notion that the F35 was ever intended to replace the F22 is an oversimplification o
3. 123.▲
   by kahnjw 10y ago

   Hard to say that the F35 was built for air to air dominance when it was designed to carry only two amraam air to air superiority missiles. The F22 can carry six.
4. 124.▲
   by kahnjw 10y ago

   I'll just refer you to the first few sentences of the wiki pages for each fighter :) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_F-22_Raptor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_F-3
5. 125.▲
   by kahnjw 10y ago

   I'm sure some Russia hawks regret the DOD decision to cancel the F22, but the F35 was not intended to replace the F22, so this is a bit irrelevant. The two aircraft a developed for different uses. The F22 was designed for air to air su
6. 126.▲
   by kahnjw 10y ago

   Clearly
7. 127.▲
   by kahnjw 10y ago

   That's what the link says....