kadenshep

30 ms·

241.
by kadenshep 9y ago
Are you able to provide a patch for the aforementioned elementary grade mistakes to the open source kernel project without introducing any kind of regression in user space?
242.
by kadenshep 9y ago
I agree with how he's saying it. He's being honest. He's letting you know where he stands and what the rule is, without any kind of hidden message or room for interpretation. The other guy? Not being so honest.
243.
by kadenshep 9y ago
What an absolutely petty and useless rule/standard.
244.
by kadenshep 9y ago
Paul Graham doing what he does best. Pseudo-philosophical musings with no basis or any kind of rigorous pass through. Why is this gaining visibility? If anyone else had posted this it'd never see the light of day on here.
245.
by kadenshep 9y ago
>That is your perspective. It's a fact.
246.
by kadenshep 9y ago
>The OP didn't talk about academia, but the more prosaical use I didn't constrain it to academia. I was quite clear in the fact it doesn't really exist anywhere. It doesn't exist because it's a complete mischarac
247.
by kadenshep 9y ago
>If we define any statement to be the perspective of the author, then no disagreement can ever be made which would not be ad hominem. His perspective has no basis, it's a narrative, and it was specifically constrained to the current
248.
by kadenshep 9y ago
>The OP stated left wing tactics boils down to: "You're view doesn't count since your aren't black/trans/queer/female enough". That's the thing. It isn't that. It has never been that. No
249.
by kadenshep 9y ago
>It's not inaccurate. there is almost always an element of intimidation Is there any way you can back this up in some solid, less qualitative manner? I understand the broadness of what is being discussed, but I've never seen th
250.
by kadenshep 9y ago
Which one is pretty accurate? The post I was replying to or my post? In either case I'd be interested in any number of prominent cases in the open source community that are relevant to the current discussion.
251.
by kadenshep 9y ago
The credibility of his own perspective on this matter is pretty fundamental to the basis of his perspective and his quote. I'm not taking to disparate events or characteristics and using it to dismiss what he's saying, quite the o
252.
by kadenshep 9y ago
>Straight into the ad hominem. That's not an ad hominem. If you're going to use logical fallacies you had best understand what they are. And don't try to partially quote me to make my statements seem more definitive than t
253.
by kadenshep 9y ago
>"you should shut the fuck up, because you are male / white / heterosexual / cisgendered / wealthy / neurotypical / had good parents / some other form of privileged that I just thought up". Ho
254.
by kadenshep 9y ago
>Schmidt was pretty clear in his book that he believes his business success is an indicator of virtue Quote the relevant parts so people can see how hyperbolic you're being.
255.
by kadenshep 9y ago
>You are clearly debating based on perceptions of my being part of 'a certain segment of people with particular persuasions'. No I'm not. I asked a very concise question that you could not answer. You replied with junk. Th
256.
by kadenshep 9y ago
You backed up your point with a website that is staunchly pro pseudo-science and fear mongering, which contains multiple sources from the Daily Mail yet again to make their point. Of course you won't have to go far to find circular sou
257.
by kadenshep 9y ago
I often see this talking point come from a certain segment of people with particular persuasions. It is extremely peculiar that you chose to link to a Daily Mail (I cannot articulate how ironic that is) article that uses another talking poi
258.
by kadenshep 9y ago
Money represents time and resources. He can't exactly restore those either.
259.
by kadenshep 9y ago
>"Those on the left face calls to characterize the Black Lives Matter movement as a hate group." Neat. You're going to need some proof or point to some core tenet of BLM that makes them hate group. Not that hard to do with
260.
by kadenshep 9y ago
...because that's where Nazis "originated" from. Just like the U.S. still has KKK members in various positions of authority, while presumably Germany or Austria have no KKK members.
261.
On the Effectiveness of Visible Watermarks – CVPR 2017(watermark-cvpr17.github.io)
1 points by kadenshep 9y ago|0 comments
262.
by kadenshep 9y ago
>I'm amazed at how the HN's Libertarian streak gets subdued I'm not. The moral lukewarmness and willingness to stick to quite literally the HN (obviously comprised of white suburbanites) echo chamber should be quite obviou