kadenshep

37 ms·

91.
by kadenshep 8y ago
I'm stating an affirmative position. You wrote two paragraphs explaining why you clicked a button because you don't think my post adds anything to the discussion, or is somehow trolling.
92.
by kadenshep 8y ago
GDPR is the best thing to have happened to the internet in a long while.
93.
by kadenshep 8y ago
> In the 60s and 70s we didn't have the "technology" to avoid null errors. Yes we did.
94.
by kadenshep 8y ago
>I'm hoping to change that. >I hope most interactions in your life are more positive than this thread. How much of a toxic person do you have to be to be consistently petty and backhanded over a conversation about a vanilla defin
95.
by kadenshep 8y ago
>I'm a stranger on the Internet. You know nothing about me I don't need to know anything about you. I just need to know that what you're saying is not rationally or logically consistent. You're playing a game with you
96.
by kadenshep 8y ago
> I'm spending my time here with them in mind, not you. I'm pretty sure you're here to hear yourself speak. I'm being terse because you're not fooling anyone else but yourself. You're concern trolling at bes
97.
by kadenshep 8y ago
I'm ignoring most of your questions because they are, to put it shortly, amazingly stupid. >And how sure are you that you could look that guy from the boat in the eye, and tell him that yes, the workers in those warehouses are slave
98.
by kadenshep 8y ago
>You removed the words "of the genuine horrors that exist even today". Um, okay. My response still stands. >Do you think we should use the same word for both of these concepts? Yeah, because I think most people are intellige
99.
by kadenshep 8y ago
I didn't edit anything, what?
100.
by kadenshep 8y ago
>but to throw words like "slavery" around in this context seems grossly disrespectful No it isn't.
101.
by kadenshep 8y ago
If only they could collectively come together to make working conditions reasonable. And maybe they could then set up an organization that would be the stewards to the principles originally demanded; this organization could even adapt to ch
102.
by kadenshep 8y ago
> Drumming the word 'toxic' in front of 'masculinity' and a lot of kids are going to believe, "it's poisonous to be male". No they aren't, and they don't. I can garauntee that most kids (who
103.
by kadenshep 8y ago
He is not. He's hitting like every disgusting talking point there is.
104.
by kadenshep 8y ago
Far, far from it. I am pretty concerned for anyone you could possibly be mentoring or in your words, "interceding." God help him, because that sounds nutty.
105.
by kadenshep 8y ago
And what if a significant portion of these people are actually just terrible people to hang out with in sociable contexts? I see a lot of discussion around blaming tech, or even funnily enough thinking that males aren't somehow allowed
106.
by kadenshep 8y ago
These are pretty loaded statements.
107.
by kadenshep 8y ago
As far as we know*, which is a pretty substantial disclaimer.
108.
by kadenshep 8y ago
>but if I can implement faster than Rust in a language that would also have similar safety properties then I'd rather do that, even if it meant somewhat slower runtime performance. Why? Does this really make sense? You write it once
109.
by kadenshep 8y ago
They're pretty large and varied circles. 99% of it definitely isn't based on emotion
110.
by kadenshep 8y ago
>You accept the trade offs of living in a dense city, but not everyone should be expected to feel the same way about the crime rates, poor schools, traffic, noise pollution, or SF style feces/needle filled streets. City centers shou
111.
by kadenshep 8y ago
>It’s currently fashionable to reject the idea that the functioning of the human mind is influenced at all by genetics. I was unaware of this fashion in either the philosophical or scientific communities.
112.
by kadenshep 8y ago
What does this even mean?
113.
by kadenshep 8y ago
>Downtown-centric planning isn't the only valid tool What are the others? >Where's the intelligentsia for those of us who don't want to live in small boxes It's not there because most experienced people in this dom
114.
by kadenshep 8y ago
>Pursuing someone's personal details He posted a HN comment that referenced an explicit link. That is not "personal." It's a publicly stated position, and one that sheds light on his true motivations on this subject.
115.
by kadenshep 8y ago
"Both sides" are not equivalent in any objective way.
116.
by kadenshep 8y ago
Because C/C++ are systems languages. You can use a hammer for whatever you like, that doesn't make it the right tool for the job. If you want ease of implementation then I'd reckon you don't need Rust. Rust is for correc
117.
by kadenshep 8y ago
Because Rust is a systems language?
118.
by kadenshep 8y ago
There's always a trail or sign with these people.
119.
by kadenshep 8y ago
"I don't understand the problems you face so clearly it's just you making up shit." That's an anstoundingly lack of emapthy and self-awareness. Also extra points for the unironic use of SJW.
120.
by kadenshep 8y ago
You are spending your energy attempting to ignore people's view points. You called SO reacting to complaints and feedback "pointless virtue signaling" You are now attempting to say you personally wouldn't bother with wha

More ›