kaba0

52 ms·

901.
by kaba0 3y ago
It has had those for a decade now.
902.
by kaba0 3y ago
> when it comes to defending the right of big business / big distro to do whatever they want? ;) Anything else about your alternative reality? Also, why don’t you go and take on support for this given target, if it’s so important fo
903.
by kaba0 3y ago
Which is not the same as it solving it, as there are a million sudoku solvers in its training set.
904.
by kaba0 3y ago
A subset of Rust. You can’t just write ordinary Rust for microcontrollers.
905.
by kaba0 3y ago
I have seen demos of Idris where just the type signature itself allows for automatic function implementation, which is very cool and almost magical. And you are probably right that many of the trivial cases can perhaps be guessed by some AI
906.
by kaba0 3y ago
You have 1ms pauses easily from simply the OS context-switching away from your program, so as I mentioned, unless you explicitly tune your OS, you have this kind of pauses, no matter the language, even if it’s hand-written assembly. Regar
907.
by kaba0 3y ago
For hard real-time normal Rust (and I guess also Ada) is insufficient. This is such a niche of a sub-niche, that you no longer write the same language as for everything else, most OSs already preclude hard real-time by their very existence,
908.
by kaba0 3y ago
Basically unique_ptr is the default in Rust. I also like to say that Rust is “just” the compile-time enforcement of C++’s smart pointers, which is technically not 100% correct, but gives a good mental image for the uninitiated, I guess.
909.
by kaba0 3y ago
So I guess the safety belt is also much more dangerous than not having it, as more people have accidents with seatbelts on? Similarly faulty logic.
910.
by kaba0 3y ago
I would definitely want a CI pipeline that randomly fails depending on what day ChatGPT has (Yeah, I know about temperature, but AIs are dumb as hell especially at logical inference stuff, so I just went with the comment in a satirical way)
911.
by kaba0 3y ago
> implementation of dependent types, which is fine. Which you have to prove, which is absolutely non-trivial. I guess it could be made into a runtime check as well where static analysis is not possible, but that seems to be a quite hard
912.
by kaba0 3y ago
Isn’t it its own language to a degree? Which may or may not be a bad thing in itself, but I do think there is value in having it natively available.
913.
by kaba0 3y ago
So where do you draw the line? Summation and multiplication of signals is fine, but conditionals are bad? That’s just arbitrary bullshitting around a non-existing problem. Hell, it is pretty easy to check iphone’s performance with measureme
914.
by kaba0 3y ago
You buying the device which makes proper images in low-light/moving situations despite its small sensor size is your goddamn consent. Buy a shitty cellphone from 2004 if you want shitty photos. Or throw some blur and noise on an iphone
915.
by kaba0 3y ago
Modulo now in low-light, moving scenes you actually get a decent photo. It doesn’t happen in good lighting, and this whole article is bullshit.
916.
by kaba0 3y ago
It’s called noise reduction, and has been done by the most primitive cell phones since forever.
917.
by kaba0 3y ago
It’s not slippery slope-y, it is slippery slope. This is not at all like DALL-e and midjourney, this is literally putting together multiple images taken shortly after another, but instead of dumbly putting it on another as it would manually
918.
by kaba0 3y ago
But why? Because out of the literally trillions of images shot with an iphone a tiny tiny percentage comes out wrong, similarly to how panorama images will look if you move? It unequivocally improves the quality of images in low light by a
919.
by kaba0 3y ago
A blurry limb is just as much a lie.
920.
by kaba0 3y ago
It’s literally photo stacking, which is as old as digital photography itself. Look up any astrophotographer, or any photographer that did an HDR shot. This is a clickbait non-article, and people’s bullshit comments with no knowledge of came
921.
by kaba0 3y ago
The two features are not exclusionary. For low-light situations you will need this feature either way, a bunch of noisy pictures doesn’t help you.
922.
by kaba0 3y ago
It won’t happen in direct sunlight, and yeah, I will definitely take it over not having that picture in a presentable state. How is that different than creating a panorama photo?
923.
by kaba0 3y ago
It can make a RAW file as well, so just the usual clickbait article/comments.
924.
by kaba0 3y ago
And some of those use cases require special cameras in the first place. Photography is basically just a measurement of light at different positions - there are endless priorities to make. You don’t need stacking multiple photos for scientif
925.
by kaba0 3y ago
> No, the solution is for the phone to stop blending multiple distinct exposures into one photo, because that's the crux of the problem - that's the "AI transformation" right there, decorrelating the photo from realit
926.
by kaba0 3y ago
Getting a roughly correct image vs a blurry mess doesn’t take control away from you and it is just bullshitting on a non-issue.
927.
by kaba0 3y ago
That’s basic photo-stacking.
928.
by kaba0 3y ago
How is that different from a noise removal algorithm? Is it also taking away control from you!
929.
by kaba0 3y ago
> The fact is that for decades countless of beautiful photos have been captured with cell phone cameras Which phones are you thinking of? Because you definitely have a very rose tinted view if you are thinking literally of cell phones ,
930.
by kaba0 3y ago
That’s a pretty hand-wavy argument. You can just frame a picture however you want to give a very different image of a situation, que that overused media-satire picture of a foot vs a knife being shown.

More ›