kaba0

48 ms·

631.
by kaba0 3y ago
Feel lucky, it’s completely made up bullshit.
632.
by kaba0 3y ago
> I cannot understand how it was possible to patent a "Start menu" It isn’t, this “article” is just bad-intentioned bullshit.
633.
by kaba0 3y ago
Thank you so much for your work! Unfortunately the project is so often dragged in mud by some loud minority, but I absolutely love it and use it every day, and I’m sure we are more numerous than the other group.
634.
by kaba0 3y ago
This “article” has absolutely no basis in reality.
635.
by kaba0 3y ago
It could add at least some minimal margin. On mobile, I literally can’t see the edges.
636.
by kaba0 3y ago
Rendering a bunch of vertices in 3D is an “embarrassingly parallel” problem, you can scale it pretty much forever. With all due respect, if you compare that to 2D layouting and stuff, you don’t know much about the topic.
637.
by kaba0 3y ago
Not an article, but a good “measuring stick” might be the binary trees benchmark: https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/... This one stresses the GC quite a bit (so it doesn’t make much sense for
638.
by kaba0 3y ago
> Go needs a state of the art GC It needs, but unfortunately it doesn’t have. That category is won by Java multiple times.
639.
by kaba0 3y ago
Go’s error handling is definitely not better than exceptions, not even close. It is just “errno” from C with bad syntax sugar. Exceptions don’t disappear randomly (no, an ‘if err’ is not error handling, and repetition just makes it prone to
640.
by kaba0 3y ago
That’s the same question as why JS is consistently much slower than Rust. They are not at all similar languages, there is absolutely zero reason to expect otherwise. Go is a managed language with a GC that will slow down threads at high all
641.
by kaba0 3y ago
Could you please tell me what PSOs are? I am not sure I found the proper abbreviation.
642.
by kaba0 3y ago
Especially that it must be fun hunting down race conditions across microservices. Like, microservices throw away every benefit of a single code base in a single language (and its guarantees). They sometimes make sense, but arguably that som
643.
by kaba0 3y ago
Why do we need "scale"? The 2nd cheapest Hetzner offering can probably serve a hundred thousand people a basic CRUD app just fine, with the DB running on the same machine. And you can just buy a slightly more expensive machine if
644.
by kaba0 3y ago
> I've quite simply never seen convincing computer-generated motion before I’m fairly sure you have seen it many times, it was just so convincing that you didn’t realize it was CGI. It’s a fundamentally biased way to sample it, as y
645.
by kaba0 3y ago
If someone’s coping mechanism is unhealthy lifestyle, then it can surely have an effect, but it is absolutely not surprising that certain mental health issues can in and of itself cause physical symptoms. Like, you wouldn’t be surprised tha
646.
by kaba0 3y ago
It doesn’t mean that they are imagining it. Why is it hard to see that the organ that controls the whole body has a say into pain/inflammation, and all that? It can send my heart rate to the sky before a presentation, make my stomach r
647.
by kaba0 3y ago
> Leonardo Da Vinci and Einstein Then it would be able to logically reason, which it absolutely can’t do. It’s a next generation search engine, which is very good at language-related tasks (and translating a python code it has in its tra
648.
by kaba0 3y ago
That’s an area where they genuinely suck, unless there is an exact wikipedia article on the topic, readily within its training data set. If you wander off of that knowledge sphere, and you are not sufficiently knowledgeable yourself about t
649.
by kaba0 3y ago
I haven’t yet seen the video, nor am I familiar with the topic - could you please tell me what ITPs are? Edit: are they interactive theorem provers?
650.
by kaba0 3y ago
Either slf4j or java’s standard lib API interface (since java 9 I believe) works with everything basically.
651.
by kaba0 3y ago
Go would need such a revamp to be anywhere close to a decent language, that it would be just a straight up other language.
652.
by kaba0 3y ago
I absolutely love a good book, but there are absolute gems of blog posts, videos from conferences, etc you deny yourself that way.
653.
by kaba0 3y ago
Yes, please do! The author actually has some very insightful comments here as well: https://lobste.rs/s/z9rb82/i_don_t_care_about_memory_safety
654.
I don't care about memory safety (2023)(linkedin.com)
92 points by kaba0 3y ago|27 comments
655.
by kaba0 3y ago
For an actual implementation of these ideas (in a non-db context), you might want to take a look at GraalVM's Truffle part, or PyPy.
656.
by kaba0 3y ago
They can have whatever opinion they want, but if they fail to grasp the basics of the topic, then that opinion should remain theirs alone.
657.
by kaba0 3y ago
I like React, but I didn’t quite figure out the “additional” ecosystem - what do you use for managing the communication with your backend, for example?
658.
by kaba0 3y ago
Sounds like you are the one without any clue, unless you have anything substantial to say.
659.
by kaba0 3y ago
A decade of work experience doesn’t necessarily give them insightful insights. Especially if they don’t even know the core point of the topic at hand.
660.
by kaba0 3y ago
How? There will be multiple decades of self-driving — human driver co-existence. I’m not convinced that this phase would be safer than the human-only one, as AI might very well handle bad human drivers much worse (as it is an edge case).

More ›