k33n

8 ms·

61.
by k33n 5mo ago
I’m simply a regular guy who got exactly what I wanted when Trump was elected. Of course I’m speaking in good faith. That’s why misguided, bad faith participants flag my reasonable remarks or send insults instead of staying on topic. It’s j
62.
by k33n 5mo ago
It’s hilarious to me that you’re under the impression you speak for a lot of people and that your anger over my personal views is so vitriolic. You should also review the code of conduct for this website and learn to communicate in good fai
63.
by k33n 5mo ago
Do poor people ever do anything sketchy as hell?
64.
by k33n 5mo ago
Deeply incongruous example tbh.
65.
by k33n 5mo ago
> just shut up and sit down and accept it? I mean, that's absolutely your only option other than simply choosing another browser. This will be a non-issue for 99% of Chrome users.
66.
by k33n 5mo ago
Fun has been optimized out of the streets. No one plays kick the can anymore. Guys, we got old.
67.
by k33n 5mo ago
I think you’re missing a basic fact here. No bank has offered to finance this deal. Furthermore, historically, banks generally don’t make mistakes. You can find news stories from over the years showing that some banks have made some mistake
68.
by k33n 5mo ago
> Even a cursory familiarity with the history of the industry shows both that this is untrue The modern trend of believing that “history” is made up of one or two things that everyone saw on the news is actually really entertaining. Defi
69.
by k33n 5mo ago
That’s not what’s slowly destroying the west but I understand that I must keep my remarks on this Marxist-friendly website very tame.
70.
by k33n 5mo ago
That’s not how these laws work. Identity isn’t going to be provided to random users of a social media site. But I’m not even anonymous here. My name is Mike Keen, and my address isn’t hard to find.
71.
by k33n 5mo ago
I think you’re living in 2010, man. Public discourse in the digital town square is completely destroyed in 2026. I attribute it mostly to bots, whether from corporate, state, or NGO activity. It’s almost impossible to tell what the organic
72.
by k33n 6mo ago
Thank you for not repeating your comment. Have an excellent day!
73.
by k33n 6mo ago
Not really.
74.
by k33n 6mo ago
Brainrot isn’t wrongthink. Brainrot is brinksmanship and zero sum discourse. As a member of the public it’s virtually impossible to know where the real consensus is on any issue today due to wishful thinking backed up by gigantic botnets. B
75.
by k33n 6mo ago
If you wouldn’t make a political statement in a town hall setting where you’re going to show ID, then you probably shouldn’t say it on the internet. But keep in mind that these laws don’t result in your identity being public. They will ulti
76.
by k33n 6mo ago
I’m betting that bot activity plummets once accounts are tied to real identities. That’s a discourse benefit. I’m also betting that discussion will become a lot more rational once people have to put their names on what they are saying. Deat
77.
by k33n 6mo ago
I want that. I'm tired of bots being half the internet traffic or more. It's driving the general public insane and anonymity on the internet has zero utility. If journalists need to send sensitive information, they'll always
78.
by k33n 6mo ago
Enjoy dying on that hill then because without mandatory ID for potentially harmful services like social media, we will continue to descend further into the brainrot that many of you suffer from today.
79.
by k33n 6mo ago
I spent a little bit of time at a PE firm last year. They went "all in" on ElizaOS because of the star hype. It was embarrassing.
80.
by k33n 6mo ago
Left wing agitators will continue to FAFO tbh
81.
by k33n 6mo ago
It was essentially a dress rehearsal for next year's mission, which will result in an actual moonwalk. And then in 2028 we will go back for a second moonwalk and foundation delivery to start building an actual moon base. Artemis is a r
82.
by k33n 6mo ago
Only the internet is grim. The actual world is better than its ever been.
83.
by k33n 6mo ago
Keep on keeping on brother.
84.
by k33n 6mo ago
There’s really nothing resembling a “pull request” that’s used by 99.999% of git users. We have merge requests. But we call them pull requests for some dumb reason.
85.
by k33n 6mo ago
How is that even a question? Of course I should be able to take the sign down.
86.
by k33n 6mo ago
Not really. Walmart trespasses shoppers every day.
87.
by k33n 6mo ago
> Section 230 doesn't say anything about publishers. This is a direct quote from the statute: “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by anothe
88.
by k33n 6mo ago
I’m not against these companies losing their Section 230 immunity. Social media platforms are, in my personal opinion, publishers in their current form. If they went back to operating as “friends and family feed providers” then letting them
89.
by k33n 6mo ago
The idea that Meta is obligated to be so impartial that it must allow lawsuits against itself to be promoted on its own platform is a bit naive and utopian. Its own TOS states that they won’t allow that.
90.
by k33n 6mo ago
I didn’t elect him to “finish all wars”. > ws he elected 'duly' (sic) Yes

More ›