Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jwheeler79
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
you guys want to argue with warren buffett about money? stop while youre ahead genius.
32.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
this is the stupidest crap ive ever heard. i can't believe smart people can be so stupid as buffett would say
33.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
rapgenius are a bunch of douches, and i cant take them seriously no matter what.
34.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
price is what you pay, value is what you get. it cost 19b, doesn't mean it's worth 19b. intrinsic value is the amount of future cash flow the business will generate discounted to present value. projected earnings must be measured
35.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
tldr if the spread between the cost and sale price is small, fees eat up a larger portion of the proceeds.
36.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
read way to wealth by ben franklin
37.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
it might be something as simple as the name, BugMuncher, which is unappealing IMO. Munching doesn't have a positive connotation, and munching bugs really sounds bad. you might take a weekend to do some rebranding and push through with
38.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
I've heard of that. PayPal also has Bill Me Later, and there are niche players like Kabbage. They're all still a ways off from full scale banking operations like JP Morgan Chase. The big banks are nearly as large as Google in Mark
39.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
There is differentiation between banks. This is from forbes: "Also Wells Fargo’s average cost of deposits at 0.35% was the lowest in the industry and half of the peer average of 0.70% in 2010 making its cost of funding the lowest in th
40.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
This article is horseshit. Just because some random sees google/amazon disrupting other industries doesn't mean they'll disrupt banking too. Not saying it couldn't happen ever, but it has the same basis as saying google
41.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
I'm tired of Google's arrogance
42.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
A bit of interesting trivia - I knew I recognized the COO Philip Walton who has his picture near the bottom of the page. He's been on TV and in the news because his wife is a survivor of the Westgate mall massacre. Small world... http
43.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
This is great. Hats off to you sir. I've come to the conclusion that some people are wired the way they are, and there's no changing them. It's also like Buffett says (don't remember the actual quote): either Graham'
44.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
If you're interested in actively managing your own portfolio, for some reason this isn't mentioned much places, but you need to have a deep understanding of financial accounting. That will allow you to read and make sense of finan
45.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
Your future is bright, friend.
46.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
HN is becoming more like reddit everyday. Ugh
47.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
This article is lame. I'm an IBM shareholder, and I want as much good news as the next shareholder, but the conclusions the author draws are absurd. He mentions Jeff Bezos' wife's review of that book to discredit Amazons mark
48.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
Probably explains why they never put any love into the allthingsd app for ipad
49.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
Keep telling yourself revenue matters without profits, and see if that lasts another 10 years. 60% growth after ten years but no profits? The only 'type' of company that is, is a loser. Some would argue even Amazon has an unsustai
50.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
GAAP earnings == earnings in the context of the parent posts. Just because you slap a fancy acronym in front of the word "earnings" doesn't make it any different. However, revenue != profit. And, a 1% profit margin is pretty
51.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
"But do you really need a co-founder? Even if you’re not technical and you think you need a technical co-founder?" I relish the day when non-technical co-founders and single founders fall by the wayside and technogeek types learn
52.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
AppScale are notorious for spamming the official GAE mailing list, and for that reason alone, I'd be cautious dealing with them
53.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
Did anyone else see the similarity between the examples and New York Times Snowfall?
54.
▲
Basic Economics (Poem)
(youtube.com)
1 points
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
|
0 comments
55.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
No - they changed this. See this post: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/google-appengine/...
56.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
lol - no kidding
57.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
Another major problem I have with the Datastore deprecation is the precedent it set. Datastore was a GA feature AFAIK. So, there's no real distinction between GA and experimental now. If something doesn't work out for Google, ex
58.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
I have a few applications running on App Engine and am using Google Apps to connect domains and do business e-mail. I've had these apps for over 2 years now and they are my livelihood. I'm a Passive Income Hacker. When App Engine
59.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
From their 10-K: "We owe $375,000 at a fixed interest charge of ten percent (10%) regardless of the time of repayment to four shareholders due March 31, 2014" That means they issued a 10% bond sale that four dumbshits, already hol
60.
▲
by
jwheeler79
13y ago
Would you say it's one of those things you feel the warm fuzzy feeling with after using it? I've been wanting to give it a try with all the hype surrounding it, but I don't see what it's going to do that provisioning a $
More ›