justsubmit

8 ms·

31.
by justsubmit 7y ago
In which case, you probably wouldn't exist, and neither would the medium in which we're having this conversation. Better or worse?
32.
by justsubmit 7y ago
Are you saying, then, that any legislation entitled "Foo Bar New Deal" will therefore have a positive effect? If so, I would like to propose a Pink New Deal. It's even better than the Green one, trust me. And it seems crazy
33.
by justsubmit 7y ago
> I don't like it but I would roll with it if that is the pragmatic solution. So, to be clear, your "pragmatic" solution is to deceive the public, because you think you are smarter than they are. Well, you're about 23
34.
by justsubmit 7y ago
Well, why don't you review this source from Wikipedia, then, and decide whether it's claptrap: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_senior_thesis
35.
by justsubmit 7y ago
> However big they seemed compared to the past, they're nothing compared to the future That is not a scientific claim.
36.
by justsubmit 7y ago
> We have also broken or tied 7 record hot days (and looks like we might go for 8 today). On average, how many record-high days have been recorded each year, for as long as your records have been kept? How many record-low days? A number
37.
by justsubmit 7y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_senior_thesis In 1969, Hillary Rodham wrote a 92-page senior thesis for Wellesley College about community organizer Saul Alinsky entitled "There Is Only the Fight&quo
38.
by justsubmit 7y ago
We know that "vociferously anti-Trump, epic-karma HN user" does. It's worthwhile to know what you represent, as well.
39.
by justsubmit 7y ago
> fascism is a far-right ideal and not a far-left one. That myth underlies much of the misunderstanding in contemporary political discourse.
40.
by justsubmit 7y ago
> I don't care if it fits your narrow definition of science. 1. That's not my definition of science--it's the definition of science. 2. If your argument is not based on science, what is it based on? > If a planet dest
41.
by justsubmit 7y ago
They already know. The question now is, when will "you" (i.e. not you personally) figure out that you're lying to yourself about your lying? Stephen Schneider advocated lying to the public in 1996: On the one hand, as scien
42.
by justsubmit 7y ago
> Reminding folks that climate change will result in more frequent and extreme weather events after/during extreme weather events is not lying. 1. That claim certainly isn't science, because it's neither reproducible nor
43.
by justsubmit 7y ago
> I have unwavering faith in climate change. That sounds like a religious statement, not a scientific one.
44.
by justsubmit 7y ago
You must be an engineer.
45.
by justsubmit 7y ago
You pasted a quote of Michael Mann, aka the hockey stick guy, a known scientific fraud. Doing things like that is why people don't believe alarmists and the NYT anymore.
46.
by justsubmit 7y ago
That attitude is very strange to me. I care about the quality and usefulness of my software. I give it away to give back, because I have been given much. There are bugs in my software which I will never discover on my own. When a user off
47.
by justsubmit 7y ago
> I've long wished git checkout (and now, git restore) would save the contents of blown-away worktree files somewhere (e.g. a throwaway stash) so that they could be retrieved from the reflog or something. Magit can do this. See ht
48.
Adding hyperlink escape codes to terminal emulators(gist.github.com)
1 points by justsubmit 7y ago|0 comments