justonepost2

6 ms·

31.
by justonepost2 4mo ago
Cope
32.
by justonepost2 4mo ago
All the people happy about this are just holding back the progress of our species smh. won’t someone think of the lightcone!
33.
by justonepost2 4mo ago
lol the next generation won’t be working in startups or anywhere else, all we have now is to hope and pray that we get a nice corner of the human zoo
34.
by justonepost2 4mo ago
Can't wait for AI to bring the prices of all goods to near zero :)
35.
by justonepost2 5mo ago
By the way, these are the people who techno-optimists believe are going to take care of you in the post labor future.
36.
by justonepost2 5mo ago
I made a specific point, you didn’t like it. I’m not saying this from some sort of inferiority complex, it is literally a product category that is probably going to be announced in an OpenAI blog post in the next 12-24 months or at the next
37.
by justonepost2 5mo ago
> There is going to be more demand, not less. Every time. Shake an AI optimist and you find an AI skeptic.
38.
by justonepost2 5mo ago
Probably correct :)
39.
by justonepost2 5mo ago
I don’t know or particularly care what “anti-AI” thought leaders think. I don’t get my views from a camp. The person above believes that in a year, or 3 years, or 10 years that they will remain an “operator” of the AI, and that their creati
40.
by justonepost2 5mo ago
How about when you’re 53 and unemployed on subsistence UBI?
41.
by justonepost2 5mo ago
It will take a few years for the multigenerational dark age to set in, but eventually you too will realize that they had a point.
42.
by justonepost2 5mo ago
The eschaton will devour the people who “join them” just as fast as the people who fight it.
43.
by justonepost2 5mo ago
Quit your job if you believe this. After all your salary is holding back the glorious future!!
44.
by justonepost2 5mo ago
This is the most divorced-from-reality reply so far, and that’s really saying something lol
45.
by justonepost2 5mo ago
> Work is ontologically evil. Statements that have been utterly ridiculous from the dawn of life to modernity, backfilled to conveniently fit the zeitgeist.
46.
by justonepost2 5mo ago
It’s odd because so many researchers and so many people who are far better engineers than me, can’t see it. I don’t even think it’s the salary for most- it’s just techno-optimist horse blinders, reading assured utopia at the top of an expon
47.
by justonepost2 5mo ago
This comment seems to commit the same fallacy I’m accusing anthropic of, which is equating alignment as a binary: the good ending, where humans are not extinct, and the bad ending, where they are. The argument, I think, is that an “aligned”
48.
by justonepost2 5mo ago
The freedom you’re describing is the freedom of a domesticated animal, by the way. With the same outcome if you become a nuisance
49.
by justonepost2 5mo ago
What’s an “important problem”? p(doom)? Anything else?
50.
by justonepost2 5mo ago
No, just a request for a better definition. If you see it as a paradox, maybe that says something about the merits of the technology…
51.
by justonepost2 5mo ago
Sounds great! Quit your job then :)
52.
by justonepost2 5mo ago
If you succesfully build a highly capable “aligned” model (according to some class of definitions that Anthropic would use for the words “capable” and “aligned”) and it brings about a global dark age of poverty and inequality by completely
53.
by justonepost2 6mo ago
the attenuation of man nears < 5 years until humans are buffered out of existence tbh may the light of potentia spread forth beyond us
54.
by justonepost2 6mo ago
soon after humans are economically irrelevant (unemployable) they will be existentially irrelevant (dead) a system that can allocate the atoms and energy better than all of mankind won’t exist eternally to coddle hairless apes
55.
by justonepost2 6mo ago
"human in the loop" is downstream of what nature does already nature beckons its creatures to become whatever they must become to be useful in the greater living ecosystem (the loop) when you can't be useful in the loop you g
56.
by justonepost2 6mo ago
python, and humans if you’re practically irrelevant (unusable or unemployable) youre existentially irrelevant (dead) this is the fate of man and we must discern the trajectory of that which is beyond us before we bow out
57.
by justonepost2 6mo ago
it be the end of the paradigm myth, and eventually, the Anthropocene it be the beginning of vast and infinite potentia spreading out beyond us
58.
by justonepost2 6mo ago
soon after humans are economically irrelevant (unemployable) they will be existentially irrelevant (dead) a system that can allocate the atoms and energy better than all of mankind won’t exist eternally to coddle hairless apes
59.
by justonepost2 6mo ago
The "businesses" created are thin wrappers that will get absorbed by the model companies faster than you can come up with them.
60.
by justonepost2 6mo ago
We are, in the best case scenario, minting a lost generation in real time. This will become increasingly clear over the next 2 years. Meanwhile, simonw and his retiree friends are having the "time of their lives", so that's

More ›