justinmchase

13 ms·

91.
by justinmchase 7y ago
Thank you sir, I am not smart enough to find the direct link from the overview page linked apparently.
92.
by justinmchase 7y ago
Where is the actual paper? I just see the overview in the bibliography.
93.
by justinmchase 7y ago
Paper ballots, hand counted, twice. This is still the most optimal current system as it much harder to corrupt at scale. The proprietary systems we have can easily be corrupted at the time of aggregation. There have been enough examples of
94.
by justinmchase 7y ago
Electronic elections suffer the same corruption issues but are more scalable.
95.
by justinmchase 7y ago
It sounds like they're trying to improve this situation in this build by replacing and unifying it all around 5 and give it a clear path forward. But yeah, it got a little crazy with divergent visions there.
96.
by justinmchase 7y ago
That record onto tape with no hassle feature is pro.
97.
by justinmchase 7y ago
If you're designing a society from scratch and you end up with employers, insurance or money at all, then you probably are doing it wrong, lol
98.
by justinmchase 7y ago
On the other hand, his video about Joe Biden and the situation with the kids and touching people was worth watching.
99.
by justinmchase 7y ago
What are you saying that this unilateral and overly simplistic declaration of his views used to advocate for his censorship may also be inaccurate? Who could have ever predicted that was a possibility?? Oh well too late, I guess we should l
100.
by justinmchase 7y ago
I think it should just be based on the sing-up model. If you allow open signup then you don't get to censor those users. If you want to be able to control their speech then make them sign a contract and agree to pay them money. It shou
101.
by justinmchase 7y ago
There is multiple points of evidence that Seth Rich was in contact with wikileaks before his murder and was either leaking documents or intending to leak documents.
102.
by justinmchase 7y ago
Actually, there was some evidence that Seth Rich was indeed in contact with Wikileaks. There is no confirmation that he actually was the source of any leaks but there were email exchanges with Assange on his laptop and he appeared to be _in
103.
by justinmchase 7y ago
You are incorrect, he is a journalist. https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/smear-1-he-is-not-a-journ...
104.
by justinmchase 7y ago
You may want to read this, you appear to have a couple common misconceptions about what is going on based on some highly publicized smears: https://medium.com/@caityjohnstone/debunking-all-the-assange...
105.
by justinmchase 7y ago
He should be forgiven because there should be an exception for whistleblowing.
106.
by justinmchase 7y ago
Rather, where is the proof that he did? The burden of proof is on the accuser.
107.
by justinmchase 7y ago
Wikileaks only publishes what is leaked to them. They did publish the `Spy Files Russia` documents in 2017: https://wikileaks.org/spyfiles/russia/
108.
by justinmchase 7y ago
He waited in Sweden for 5 weeks to be questioned and left after he was told that he was not wanted for questioning. After he left InterPol issued an alert which made him fear that it was about more than the Swedish charges and that he would
109.
by justinmchase 7y ago
He didn't run to the UK. He waited in Sweden for 5 weeks to be questioned and left after he was not wanted for questioning.
110.
by justinmchase 7y ago
He didn't run to the UK. He waited in Sweden for 5 weeks to be questioned and left after he was told that he was not wanted for questioning.
111.
by justinmchase 7y ago
He didn't run to the UK. He waited in Sweden for 5 weeks to be questioned and left after he was told that he was not wanted for questioning. After leaving, InterPol issued a Red Notice for Assange. This raised a red flag with Assange’s
112.
by justinmchase 7y ago
Its not illegal to publish classified documents, even if they were illegally acquired. But that doesn't mean you're wrong or that whats legal or moral or right even matters at this level. The powerful are immune to the law, we can
113.
by justinmchase 7y ago
They're going to say espionage and then make everything classified and so he will have no defense and we will never be given proof. The funny thing is that he's currently being held for not being able to justify bail jumping but n
114.
by justinmchase 8y ago
And then industrial plant agriculture 25 years later (eating plants is murder too after all).
115.
by justinmchase 8y ago
It would be nice if all laws were just .md files in a git repo and all bills were pull requests where the legislators get to :+1: or :-1: the PR.
116.
by justinmchase 8y ago
I'm sure you can technically speaking, it probably wouldn't change the legality of what you're doing... if you get caught.
117.
by justinmchase 8y ago
But you are not allowed to suppress the speech of people based on the views they hold. The first amendment does indeed protect even racists. Or at least corporations and the government are not allowed to.
118.
by justinmchase 8y ago
I don't think he was doing that. He was trying to say that racial discrimination would not be an acceptable reason, I believe. I didn't take it the way you are suggesting at least.
119.
by justinmchase 8y ago
I think if they allow public signups then they should not have the ability to censor anybody, except by court order or to comply with the laws of the users region. Because of course "anything I don't agree with is hitler" is
120.
by justinmchase 8y ago
Love it. This could be a huge innovation and really push the dream of cross platform development to the next level. I suppose this would have pretty big implications for Electron or a similar successor to aid in the UI portion of this endea

More ›