Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
junke
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
61.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
While this is interesting, trigger warnings are used online as keywords to filter out some posts, so people do not have to read them in the first place.
62.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
This was all over the Internet, I do not live in America and this was covered on TV. And surely not all people knew about that event. The thing is I don't believe he, in particular, would ignore it and I don't trust him anyway fwi
63.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
Oh nevermind, I saw the lobster post, FRIGN says he wasn't aware about Charlottesville at the time (living in a basement without internet access, probably).
64.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
-1 points, I guess some people don't like links
65.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
There was a tweet about Nazi stuff: https://twitter.com/pid_eins/status/1113738764797534208?s=19 See also https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20845633 I don't know much more about the commun
66.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
This is a minor nitpick but please check your facts about other Lisps when comparing them with Clojure. > Part of that is due to deviations from traditional Lisps: a more human readable API (first, rest etc.) first, second, rest ... are
67.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
I have a Lisp process that has been running for weeks now (window manager + devel. stuff), and any time I need to compute something I can go the REPL. I suppose Snail could be used in a same way ( https://github.com/gcv/
68.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
I agree, but "more realistically"? those cases were pretty realistic I think. If you run the script on a box where you have users who can do whatever they want, at least the script should fail on bad inputs. PATH=rm -rf :&#x
69.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
- This fails on badly formed PATH, or malicious PATH - When PATH contains entries that no longer exist / are not mounted, substitution with "sed" gives a wildcard that is not expanded, and eventually makes "file" re
70.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
(can't believe this was downvoted)
71.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
Command-line tools where you glue byte streams are, in spirit, very much like web scraping. Sure, tools can be good or bad, but by design you are going to have ad-hoc input/output formats, and for some tools this is interleaved with pr
72.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
This is brogrammer speak (e.g. http://new_words.enacademic.com/662/brogrammer ).
73.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
> The only definition from that page that is not related to some extremist marxist/anarchist movement is this article Why is it important for you to filter some definitions out? > And even that one uses the logo of the Antifaschi
74.
▲
History Will Judge the Complicit
(theatlantic.com)
16 points
by
junke
6y ago
|
1 comments
75.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
They were rivals, it is important to the story that the sanctuary belongs to Baskin: > Joe Exotic is now serving 22 years for trafficking animals, killing tigers, and plotting to murder his sworn enemy, the big-cat rights activist Carole
76.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
The reply said "corporatism and fascism" can both exist, not "corporatism implies fascism".
77.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
Why did you put a link to the Antifa_(Germany) article?
78.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
"Beyond reproach", a claim made by whom?
79.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
Maybe because you are cherry-picking one definition, as-if what matters is what the term used to mean 75 years ago? Wikipedia points to many resources about Antifa movements, starting from here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
80.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
> The English word antifa (or ANTIFA) is a loanword from German, taken as a shortened form of the word antifaschistisch ("anti-fascist") and the name of Antifaschistische Aktion which inspired the wider Antifa movement in Germa
81.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
Can we have a "Godwin point" equivalent for when someone brings censorship for no reason? The "Orwell Scarecrow"?
82.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
Please reread your comment and think about your attitude.
83.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
Another way of cheating, with reader macros in Common Lisp: USER> #1=(LAMBDA () (WRITE '#1# :CIRCLE T) NIL)
84.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
"your assertion": I am not the person you were replying too. Summarizing done well does noy change the meaning, you just interpretated things some way. In fact it looks like you are replying to claims nobody but you are fabricat
85.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
1. "the only possible and conceivable reason": you are extrapolating 2. Sexism can happen even when everybody cautiously avoid talking about the author's gender.
86.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
Thanks a lot
87.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
On the internet, nobody knows you are a mouse.
88.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
> what state was created by the combination of the first 7 instructions, and does the eighth instruction depend on that state? You would still have the same problem by using a notation that looks like function application. The alternativ
89.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
This just works: USER> (yason:parse "{\"null\" : null, \"false\" : false, \"empty\": []}" :object-as :plist :json-arrays-as-vectors t
90.
▲
by
junke
6y ago
There are two things at play here (1) the implicit body and (2) being able to add new bindings in an existing scope with "def". CL has an implicit body, but does not allow defining new bindings outside of some dedicated forms (let
More ›