Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jubilanti
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
61.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
> A friend of mine is in the camera business and was wondering how the hell they're making the money they're making off of local and state government contracts. The Los Angeles Police Department annual budget is over $2 billion
62.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
Read my sentence again. With your human eyes and brain: > ** Google's** up there at 23.4% primarily because GCP/Vertex/whatever they're offering is a billing nightmare and the only way to set a hard cap and sure you
63.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
Quite frankly, the proprietary company's products are no longer good enough for them to be able to enforce a moat. The scene is popping and nobody is satisfied staying with one provider. If they stopped selling via Openrouter, the 18.2
64.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
They get paid the same either way, Openrouter takes their cut and passes it onto the consumer. And anyone with an Openrouter account has already escaped from their proprietary moat. So for those who have expressed a clear preference for pro
65.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
You must be unfamiliar with the cult of the 10,000 steps a day.
66.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
Nice thing about BLE is that it can be really cheap and stateless, you don't need to keep polling. If it was sending each and every step count to the watch (or even every minute) that would be one thing, but a semi-daily sync for time
67.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
> I don't understand why a CS rep would get this invested to the point of wanting to cause you real harm This is the kind of power tripping that easily corrupts people, especially those who don't have much power outside of wor
68.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
This is the closest I'm finding! CI, web-based ticket submission for anyone with a site-wide login, static hosting, good price... web-based patching would be nice, good to see it in development. Some honest feedback: 10 minutes of sear
69.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
Good points. I guess I keep just wanting 'you are the product' / enshitification / free tier capture to not be the dominant business model of our time. You're right that a YC VC would likely not funds this. There ar
70.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
> I don't understand the entitlement in your post here. Excuse me, I'm literally asking where I can pay to get the specific cloud/web-based features I listed. I'm trying hard to NOT rely on a free tier because I want
71.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
You forgot "MAKE NO MISTAKES!!!1!"
72.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
Almost 3 hours in and still "We are still working to identify the root cause" Can't even view diffs in the web interface! I'm out! I am willing to pay ~$5-10/mo for a reliable host I can swap as painlessly as possib
73.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
> Not sure why you’re being downvoted The only consistent position on US politics that won't get you downvoted on HN is "both parties are dumb."
74.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
It was a missed opportunity to top it off from about 625m to 714m barrels. But the Trump administration really shot themselves in the foot by loudly championing it as a bailout for big oil. Trump didn't care about the reserve, he cared
75.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
> What was the use case covered by this huge reserve if only a small part can be used before geopardising its future? Total global war (WWII style), total economic collapse (1929 style), and other kinds of not-even-once-in-a-generation m
76.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
These sentences are deceptive and journalistic malpractice. The "instead" implies there have been dozens of *full* drawdowns. Check the data: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f&#x
77.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
Just going to leave this graph of reserves over time here: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f4/US...
78.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
> A team made a highly effective content recommendation system and Netflix never used it. Why? It killed revenue. Nope. This is an internet urban legend. The Netflix prize was only ever for marketing and recruitment. They never intended
79.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
Not only that, the policy is so broad you effectively give up EVERYTHING. They're within their rights to just straight up post your raw conversation history to a public dataset on github/huggingface/modelscope or even host an
80.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
This is one of the most ridiculously awesome findings this year, that changed my mental model of how foundation models work. It sounds crazy, but it's way cheaper and faster for multimodal models to read text on images than the equival
81.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
Their privacy policy doesn't forbid them from just straight up publishing your raw prompts as training data. My threat model is that anything I POST to DeepSeek I treat as public to the web, as much as a public GitHub repo is.
82.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
404 URL that does not give any evidence for the claim made in the post title
83.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
But I must insist: "building a car" is not hard (millions of children do so every year with Pinewood derby style box car kits), building a "real car" that you can use and that passes regulations is harder, but knowing th
84.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
> The fact that these same people can't tell whether it was authored by a human or an AI without a seperate disclosure is strong evidence that human authorship as such is not what they value at all. By that logic, the fact that (som
85.
▲
by
jubilanti
2mo ago
There was someone on HN who shared a collection of dozens of single purpose local/offline web apps for things like file conversions, I think image cropping, and other one-offs like that. Anyone remember? Nice thing about local PWAs is
86.
▲
by
jubilanti
3mo ago
Already built pages are still being served, but I've been waiting for 3 hours for an action to rebuild a single fix to a broken link.
87.
▲
by
jubilanti
3mo ago
Because Ceuta has been all over the news, Morocco's other weird border is getting attention.
88.
▲
by
jubilanti
3mo ago
It's called reward hacking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reward_hacking
89.
▲
by
jubilanti
3mo ago
At max, two full work weeks for a lightly trained amateur to transcribe 42 hours of decent but not great quality audio. A professional could do it in near realtime. For me, it is notable that this is notable for you. This used to be as ubiq
90.
▲
by
jubilanti
3mo ago
So is the author going to pay my hosting bills for me for all the LLM-directed spamming? If not, then I don't want to hear it. Lots of places that serve compressed database dumps (like Wikipedia) find themselves flooded by LLMs downloa
More ›