jtmarmon

26 ms·

211.
by jtmarmon 11y ago
Agreed, they're not convenient for arbitrary attributes. I think where they shine are using a well defined preset of attributes to define structure. Regarding the legacy thing, I think it's both. If you look at a lot of new toolin
212.
by jtmarmon 11y ago
This article is pretty garbage. compares almost nothing about xml and instead compares the tooling around xml giving no thought to the tooling around json. instead, let me give you my unsolicited opinion: if you need to represent both the s
213.
by jtmarmon 11y ago
Only true if those purchases would've only been made on amazon prime. The author said he replaced target with amazon prime, so it would make sense his spending on AP shoots up. In reality it's hard to say for sure.
214.
by jtmarmon 11y ago
can someone explain why it can't run Shor's? I thought Shor's was an algorithm designed to be run on QC, and D-Wave is a QC. What makes D-Wave different from the intended hardware?
215.
by jtmarmon 11y ago
even more abused now w/ es6 arrow shorthand
216.
by jtmarmon 11y ago
join the slack chat. very active and helpful. even the facebook guys are there and I get to ask them about there nitty gritty closed source implementation details
217.
by jtmarmon 11y ago
> so that the front-end designer can decide which calls to make, and whether requesting [field2] is worth the cost. How is this different in essence from an annotation? It's also worth noting if you want to have guarantees that your
218.
by jtmarmon 11y ago
This is how netflix approached api gateways. http://techblog.netflix.com/2012/07/embracing-differences-in... However, this approach is a giant pain in the ass and technologies like Falcor (netflix cannabilizing it
219.
by jtmarmon 11y ago
Database servers - AWS RDS Queue servers - AWS SQS SSL termination - AWS ELB Logging aggregator - depends on how you're deploying. We're deploying our containers onto elastic container service and adding one of these: https:&#x2F
220.
by jtmarmon 11y ago
i might be wrong, but i'm fairly certain you have rights that you need to explicitly give up in the form of a license in order for it to be "free"
221.
by jtmarmon 11y ago
is there a reason for this existing other than the coolness? it can't be more convenient than setting up just about any actual nosql database honestly what the world needs is a better ORM for node...sequelize is absolute shit
222.
by jtmarmon 11y ago
got it. so the idea is generally people want to do sort-of 2nd derivative queries on the data, so it's best to get those first stats out of the way in the warehousing step
223.
by jtmarmon 11y ago
Thanks for your input. The point of a BI tool is to allow flexible analysis of your data. What types of transformations are generally required for making this work without actually _doing_ the analysis during the warehousing step?
224.
by jtmarmon 11y ago
woah, right as a I wrote that edit I get this comment ;) very cool. checking it out
225.
by jtmarmon 11y ago
Sort of off topic, but every cool BI tool I can find (prompted by recently seeing metabase and AWS quicksight) seems to work with one database at a time. When working with microservices, your data is spread across some N databases, renderin
226.
by jtmarmon 11y ago
> "no one runs bare docker containers in Production" can you elaborate on this?
227.
by jtmarmon 11y ago
agreed. i imagine it could get a bit cliquey. i think it almost certainly depends on the structure of the host engineering team and also its size.
228.
by jtmarmon 11y ago
> Keep in mind that these early people will have a huge impact on the community’s culture and values in long run. amen. not only by how they conduct themselves/what they're interested in, but also in the people they help recrui
229.
by jtmarmon 11y ago
We're using datomic in production. It's had its ups and downs. For one, having raw data available at in-memory speeds really changes the level of expressiveness you have in your code; you no longer are constrained to packing every