Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jsiepkes
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
71 ms
·
961.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
I think performance is not the main reason for going stateless for most people. With stateless you can more easily achieve HA of your auth server. Since it is all stateless your auth servers dont need to know about each other. However with
962.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
I think these two parts sum it up nicely: > "Where Damore had argued that Google's diversity policies went too far, Altheide argued that Google was doing too little to promote workplace diversity." > "I respectfull
963.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
> Still is I'm just going to leave this here: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-42421417
964.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
At the time we looked at OpenShift and decided not to use it because there was no easy wat to update an openshift cluster. In all fairness I have no clue what the current state of this issue is. For us it was important enough to be a deal b
965.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
If a company gets a big enough marketshare it's not that simple. If Google would have de-listed Protonmail just because "they could" that would be a problem (legal wise) in the EU. Since they also specifically target EU count
966.
▲
Build your own fingerprint reader
(raspberrypi.org)
3 points
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
|
0 comments
967.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
We use OpenBSD for our firewalls at work.
968.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
From the article: “Apple gave us this permission years because Apple Watch couldn’t handle our maps rendering. It’s not connected to anything in our current codebase,” Uber’s spokesperson explained.
969.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
Userland isn't duplicated, it's 2 totally separated userlands. The userlands may be the same distro in case of Xen (for example RHEL 7) but they still lead separate lives; They are different installations. So that's also mult
970.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
Well performance aside there is also the benefit of not having to maintaining userland.
971.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
JEP 189: Shenandoah: An Ultra-Low-Pause-Time Garbage Collector ( http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/189 ) could help with that.
972.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
How so? There was BEA JRockIT, IBM J9, Azuul, Oracle and HP also have a JVM iirc.
973.
▲
Eclipse OpenJ9 – Open-source JVM
(github.com)
322 points
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
|
104 comments
974.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
If you want to take mono into account as the first free .net implementation you should take GCJ into account as free Java implementation. GCJ was started in 1998....
975.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
Really cool! Does anyone know of the other way around; An open source Windows next gen FS (ReFS) driver for Linux?
976.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
You do know that J2EE has been called JEE for ages now right?
977.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
While I really respect Brendan's opinion (I've got most of his books and he is one of my IT heroes) I do think he is very netflix-IT-scale minded. When your Netflix you can maintain your own kernel with ZFS, DTrace, etc. and have
978.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
This article https://www.linux.com/news/learn/intro-to-linux/how-facebook... explains somewhat what Facebook does with BTRFS. "Mason: The easiest way to describe the infrastructure at Facebook is that it
979.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
True, and that very long post basically says with many words: "Yes, Linux namespace (docker) isn't as secure as FreeBSD jails or Solaris Zones but security is not the problem docker solves. Docker solves a deployment problem, not
980.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
Is BTRFS really an option now that RedHat has decided to pull the plug on their BTRFS development? That basically leaves Oracle and Suse I think? As far as I can tell the future of BTRFS doesn't look good. Facebook using it doesn'
981.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
Nice article! Though I do think the article could have more clearly noted that Linux containers are not meant as security boundaries. It doesn't explicitly say it but it is a very important distinction. Unlike FreeBSD jails and Solaris
982.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
From what I understand most of the SPARC people got laid of too. So unless Fujitsu really ups it's SPARC game I doubt there is much future for SPARC.
983.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
The last part about patents is not true. The OpenJDK has a patent pledge in it. Google even started incorporating OpenJDK into Android to protect itself from the patent case. The whole patent case with Oracle was not about OpenJDK but about
984.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
We actually moved from Mattermost to Zulip. Mattermost and Slack work fine for highly specific project teams but when used in an Enterprise for the day to day operation the poor threading solutions in both become a drag. Especially the abil
985.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
Why is that? If you don't want to work with certain people you are free to pickup your stuff and go elsewhere.
986.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
Meanwhile in the comment section of this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15124306 HackerNews MongoDB article basically everyone (who speaks up at least) seems to agree that the drawbacks of NoSQL outweigh the benefits
987.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
In fifty years...
988.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
While I'm inclined to agree with you the makers of SOAP don't seem to share your opinion. Any SOAP fault must be send with an HTTP 500 according to the spec.
989.
▲
How Oracle tackles licensing discrepancies
(computerweekly.com)
2 points
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
|
0 comments
990.
▲
by
jsiepkes
9y ago
With all the complexity of OSGi I wonder if it isn't easer to go full microservice right away. With OSGi everything becomes complex real fast; Testing, troubleshooting class loader issues, etc. Also having one misbehaving bundle will
More ›