jsherwani

11 ms·

61.
by jsherwani 6y ago
Sorry, this looks like a bug! We will try to fix it soon (likely after the holidays).
62.
by jsherwani 6y ago
Hmmm I got this response when I submitted the form: pop.com is not blocked by this blocklist Probable causes: - An other blocklist blocking it? - Regex? - An older version of this list contained it? > Make sure you are using the latest v
63.
by jsherwani 6y ago
Thank you! Looking into this now...
64.
by jsherwani 6y ago
Glad you liked it! We have plans to make it easier to get into a circle (one person elects to start a circle, and others elect to join).
65.
by jsherwani 6y ago
Glad you liked it! Please keep the feedback coming.
66.
by jsherwani 6y ago
We haven't yet measured audio latency, but our main product ( https://screen.so ) is all about low latency screen sharing, so we're very interested in reducing lag of all sorts. Performance is something we'll focus
67.
by jsherwani 6y ago
Since our company is personally bootstrapped by me, answering this will divulge more of my personal financial situation than I would like to share. However, I can say that I worked with https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=t
68.
by jsherwani 6y ago
Thank you! I really appreciate it. I wrote this elsewhere: We bought this domain a few months ago, and you're probably right, since Gmail seems to mark our outgoing emails as spam. I'm not very well-versed in how to undo the reput
69.
by jsherwani 6y ago
Not at all! We'd originally bought pop.com to be the new home for screen.so, but once we made this new product, we wanted to launch it asap. Our plan is to merge the two in the near future, and work on the intersection between 2D and 3
70.
by jsherwani 6y ago
We bought this domain a few months ago, and you're probably right, since Gmail seems to mark our outgoing emails as spam. I'm not very well-versed in how to undo the reputation the previous owners seem to have created for the doma
71.
by jsherwani 6y ago
That's a fair point, here's a little more information: https://www.producthunt.com/posts/pop-9
72.
by jsherwani 6y ago
Pop founder here. We’re a team of 5, and folks from our team have built products like Screenhero, Slack Calls, and most recently, Screen.so. Pop lets you have a video call in 3D, with positional audio. It works in a browser, without any dow
73.
Show HN: Pop.com – Video Calls, in 3D(pop.com)
239 points by jsherwani 6y ago|136 comments
74.
by jsherwani 6y ago
If the theory is correct, Zoom fatigue exists because videoconferencing is a worse experience than in-person conversations. Media quality, latency, the inability to use most of our motor/sensory apparatus, all contribute to micro-frust
75.
by jsherwani 7y ago
We’re looking into this: https://screen.canny.io/bugs/p/linux-single-screen-selection...
76.
by jsherwani 7y ago
In 2015, when we joined, Slack’s Mac app was using "MacGap" (i.e. the PhoneGap/Cordova model but for Mac). Electron was being used for Windows only, and it was a lot later that it became the platform for Slack’s Mac, Windows
77.
by jsherwani 7y ago
You can disable global shortcuts from the Settings menu (when you're not in a call). But yes, we'll be improving this!
78.
by jsherwani 7y ago
A/V set up: good point. We can definitely improve this, although we’d need to be mindful to not add too much clutter to the already-dense minipanel. Digital multiplayer whiteboard: we sort of do. You can draw even outside of a screen s
79.
by jsherwani 7y ago
Thank you! I’ve just pushed the following change to the site (will be live in <10 mins): >Neither Screen nor these third parties store or record media data as part of the Service, nor process it other than for the purpose of providing
80.
by jsherwani 7y ago
A simple fix for the specific issue you mentioned is to stop sharing your screen for however long you want, while still staying in the meeting. You can then turn it back on whenever you’d like. Having said that, I’ve heard this request a fe
81.
by jsherwani 7y ago
The specifics of the speed gains are our secret sauce, I’m afraid! But at a high level, we reduced the time taken in every step of the pipeline between capture > encode > send > receive > decode > render that we could, while
82.
by jsherwani 7y ago
Check out our roadmap, with the two items for virtual office. One has a small screenshot, and the other has a Figma prototype that walks you through the idea. Please post any feedback there so we can have it in one place, and so you can be
83.
by jsherwani 7y ago
It’s exactly as you described — no one in the chain is analyzing the content of the data being transferred. Both our infrastructure providers (Daily is our primary, Twilio is an opt-in secondary) care deeply about security, and both are use
84.
by jsherwani 7y ago
If text editing is all you need, and both sides are comfortable with the tools, then what you’ve suggested is definitely faster than Screen (tmux sends text, we send pixels). But if the guest needs to see something else on the host’s comput
85.
by jsherwani 7y ago
I felt the same way, and then decided to build Screen! Your bike shedding comment made me laugh out loud :D
86.
by jsherwani 7y ago
Yes! We’ve been laser focused on getting the product right, so the discount model hasn’t been fully fleshed out, but you can expect something similar to what other SaaS companies do in this space, but leaning to the more-generous side of th
87.
by jsherwani 7y ago
We don’t want to reinvent the wheel. Slack is great for what it does! And if you read through https://screen.so/about , I have lived the experience that it’s impossible to do two things well. So in an ideal world, Slack cont
88.
by jsherwani 7y ago
Sure! WebRTC server: Daily (primary), and Twilio (secondary) There’s no shortcut to the performance side of things, so we had to do a lot of custom work on Mac, Windows and Linux to get screen sharing to be super fast. The high level bit th
89.
by jsherwani 7y ago
Thanks for being a supporter! I hope Screen can take the place left by Screenhero.
90.
by jsherwani 7y ago
So happy to hear this <3

More ›