Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jsheard
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
They do allow you to run third party operating systems on Macs. For now.
32.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
It's probably cheaper to squish everything into one small PCB on one side of the machine.
33.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
I wonder if this means a Mac Nano with an A-series chip is on the table now. Essentially a beefed up Apple TV that runs macOS.
34.
▲
Sony Pulls Back from PlayStation Games on PC
(bloomberg.com)
2 points
by
jsheard
7mo ago
|
0 comments
35.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
Several 5K 27" 120hz+ monitors were announced at CES earlier this year, likely all using the same panel as the new Studio Display. Apparently MSI is shooting for about $900. https://youtu.be/r6VT5bEeKWw?t=197
36.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
> yeah, clearly nobody buys Samsung Galaxy S series for years, they are like the least popular Android phone model... /s I don't think the smaller Galaxy S models are what people generally mean when they talk about small phones
37.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
You don't raise $42M for just a text editor, it was always going to be a vehicle for services and subscriptions and whatever else they can think of.
38.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
That's finally set to be resolved with Nova Lake later this year, which will support AVX10 (the new iteration of AVX512) across both core types. Better very late than never.
39.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
If you count every service together, it's deep into one nine. https://mrshu.github.io/github-statuses/ Most individual services have two nines... but not all of them.
40.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
Top-down mandates to use AI as much as possible, and to rip up their infrastructure and move everything to Azure. https://www.windowscentral.com/microsoft/using-ai-is-no-long... https://thenewstack.io/g
41.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
> billionares use the same iPhones as you do! Not if they have the brain disease which makes this kind of thing appealing: https://caviar.global/catalog/custom-iphone/iphone-17/?sort=... Yes that flagship
42.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
RAM is still RAM, the switch from crusty HDDs to fast NVMe SSDs may have helped to smooth things over when you spill into swap but it's not going to do miracles.
43.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
Yeah this is correct, I don't know why you're being downvoted. The decisions Apple made when pivoting their software stack to high-DPI resulted in Macs requiring ultra-dense displays for optimal results - that's a limitation
44.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
Upcoming OLED panels are switching to vertical RGB stripe, similar to LCDs, which should fix the remaining text issues. https://www.tomshardware.com/monitors/lg-display-reveals-wor...
45.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
> Meanwhile, Macs had no such price change Yeah because Mac upgrade prices were already sky high, long before the component shortage. 32GB of DDR5-6000 for a PC rocketed from $100 to $500, while the cost of adding 16GB to a Mac was and
46.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
> Look how many people bought Minis and ended up just paying for API calls anyway. (Saw it IRL 2x, see it on reddit openclaw daily) Aren't the OpenClaw enjoyers buying Mac Minis because it's the cheapest thing which runs macOS,
47.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
> It’s $400 to go from 16GB to 32GB. No change from the previous models then, 16GB->32GB was already $400. They're cutting into their previously enormous margins to keep the prices stable, rather than hiking the prices to maintai
48.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
Those budget alerts usually aren't instant though, they only fire when the cloud gets around to reconciling your usage some number of hours or even days after the damage is done. It's better than nothing but with runaway spending
49.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
If you want a picture of the future, imagine a bot stamping LGTM! :sparkles: :rocket: on a pull request - forever.
50.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
The whole repo must be absolutely swarming with agents, just look at the sheer rate of issues and pull requests. There was 6 new PRs in the last 10 minutes at the time of writing. It's not much of a stretch to assume the stars are als
51.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
Carmack isn't exactly a neutral observer here, his main gig since quitting VR has been as the founder of a VC-backed AI startup. He has a clear financial interest in joining the chorus of AI boosters.
52.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
Addendum - now they've changed the dates of several articles retroactively, to increase the spacing.
53.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
The rate they are posting new articles on random subjects is also a pretty indicative of a content mill. In 3 days they've covered machine learning, geometry, cryptography, file formats and directory services.
54.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
In practice RLHF isn't a survey of every living humans personal style or preferences though, its purpose is to make the model more useful in the eyes of the vendor, mainly by getting cheap third-world labor to nudge the model according
55.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
LLMs might follow the frequencies of the training data in their raw form, but nobody uses raw LLMs, they use models which have been RLHFed to hell and back to bias them towards specific patterns. Then newer models were trained on the output
56.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
Christ their repo is an absolute nightmare. There's new issues and PRs being posted practically every minute, and I assume 99% of them are from agents given the target demographic. Just full-auto vibeslop from all barrels 24/7.
57.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
> Good. I'd rather not have my favorite AI from a company working on AGI to have murder and spying in it's DNA. Anthropic made it quite clear they are cool with spying in general, just not domestic spying on Americans, and thei
58.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
The problem is less with the style itself and more that it's strongly associated with low-effort content which is going to waste the readers time. It would be nice to be able to give everything the benefit of the doubt, but humans have
59.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
And as we all know, more lines of code always produces better results. That's why we call it "technical wealth".
60.
▲
by
jsheard
7mo ago
> But why "explicitly forbid generative AI". The AI policy linked from the OP explains why. It's half not wanting to deal with slop, and half ethical concerns which still apply when it's used judiciously.
More ›