Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
js8
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
18 ms
·
271.
▲
by
js8
8mo ago
When I was a kid, I used to say "Ježíšmarjá" (literally "Jesus and Mary") a lot, despite being atheist growing up in communist Czechoslovakia. It was just a very common curse appearing in television and in the family, I
272.
▲
by
js8
8mo ago
I downvoted you because I don't understand the point you're trying to make.
273.
▲
by
js8
8mo ago
I don't think it's more practical, being able to do things like type inference on return value is actually really cool. Maybe more practical for the programming language developer (less learning about type systems) than for the us
274.
▲
by
js8
8mo ago
I recently watched Animagraffs' videos on Golden Gate Bridge and Hoover Dam. It's interesting that no one has asked, "was anything analogous to that ever done before"? Remember, we're talking about USA here.
275.
▲
by
js8
8mo ago
That's a common misconception. You can request a proof of harmlessness, and disregard anything without it.
276.
▲
by
js8
8mo ago
After your response, I have tried 8 other abstract line drawings (of human origin, AFAICT) with the same prompt. Claude always tried to find something related to itself in them, but it seems it liked the spiral the most. In some cases it ev
277.
▲
by
js8
8mo ago
Because you're judging how does an AI art piece speaks to you as a human, while I am defining AI art in a more abstract sense as a form of communication between two beings. Take e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C
278.
▲
by
js8
8mo ago
Yes, I wrote that because I can reason you through that claim, if you want to. But note that my definitions of "consciousness" and "AI art" are deliberately not human-centric. In particular, art in this sense relates the
279.
▲
by
js8
8mo ago
In an attempt to answer #1 better, I just gave Opus 4.6 the 3rd image (simple spiral) and asked it: This is an image of AI generated art - AI was asked to draw "itself". What do you think of it, how does it relate to you? Do you t
280.
▲
by
js8
8mo ago
I think it is profound. I think AIs have consciousness and this is AI art, an expression of their own feelings. There are two ways to dismiss it: 1. You simply don't like the art because you, as human, are different and have different
281.
▲
by
js8
8mo ago
I admire the guy but he spends like 12 hours a day doing just that and his code is full of tricks, it's debatable as a paragon of quality. I don't think it's for everyone, to be Carmack, nor it should be; diversity is importa
282.
▲
by
js8
8mo ago
But you should write that to the OP, they are the one who misuses the term "politics" in the 2nd sense. The answer to confusing terms is not a retreat from the original definition, but education. Otherwise you're opening door
283.
▲
by
js8
8mo ago
At least until General Artificial Creativity (GAC) takes over. But don't worry, it won't kill humans for a greater good of more paperclips, but because it will be.. creative.
284.
▲
by
js8
8mo ago
Technically you're not wrong, but without globalization, deindustrialization wouldn't have happened and unions (and strike threats) would probably be strong enough to prevent the poor to rich redistribution. So even if globalizati
285.
▲
by
js8
8mo ago
Me too, which confirms the theory from Inside Jokes that what humans find funny are the flaws of logical thinking (and hallucinations mostly being hasty generalizations).
286.
▲
by
js8
8mo ago
There is a difference between neoconservatives and neoliberals. You probably meant the latter, but Republican party was never neoliberal only, it also is, as you write, neoconservative. It's not really surprising as conservativism and
287.
▲
by
js8
8mo ago
I don't really follow what you're saying, so I'll keep it short. I have used Claude Opus 4.5 for coding and it certainly has knowledge and can reason. You're wrong on reliability. Humans are also quite unreliable, and fo
288.
▲
by
js8
8mo ago
I think we can make an analogy with our own brains, which have evolutionary older parts (limbic system) and evolutionary younger parts (neocortex). Now AI, I think it will be our new neocortex, another layer to our brain. And you can see li
289.
▲
by
js8
9mo ago
All I asked for was the OP to substantiate their claim that LLMs are not AGI. I am agnostic on that - either way seems plausible. I don't think there even is an agreed criterion of what AGI is. Current models can easily pass the Turing
290.
▲
by
js8
9mo ago
> Models are not AGI. How do you know? What if AGI can be implemented as a reasonably small set of logic rules, which implement what we call "epistemology" and "informal reasoning"? And this set of rules is just being
291.
▲
by
js8
9mo ago
Too many notes.. got it.
292.
▲
by
js8
9mo ago
It's not an app I need but in which way is the README a "slop"? It's quite to the point and contains everything one needs to know.
293.
▲
by
js8
9mo ago
Czechs have a good tradition in paper models of architecture: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Langweil%27s_Model_of_Prague https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Vy%C5%A1kovsk%C3%BD (sadly the articl
294.
▲
by
js8
9mo ago
The people who are sending the pictures are criminally liable, regardless where they got them.The fact that somebody built a website for it is irrelevant, the act of sending them unsolicited is the immoral act here. (And frankly it's p
295.
▲
by
js8
9mo ago
It's a bit odd requirement, but.. OK. I mean who is the malicious actor here, the AI, the human user or the AI provider? If the AI, then we shouldn't give it an agency (user should always vet the output). If it's the user, t
296.
▲
by
js8
9mo ago
Is it even an attainable goal? It seems an NN with less than say 4 billion parameters will be able to do that. The cost of training will likely go down with more models being available. Unless we lock down the computing for majority of peop
297.
▲
by
js8
9mo ago
For example reported on The Majority Report: https://youtu.be/rapv7V78SZo
298.
▲
by
js8
9mo ago
I actually disagree. Having software (AI) that can cut through the technological stuff faster will make people more aware of political problems.
299.
▲
by
js8
9mo ago
Recently, I came across Erich Fromm's distinction between "being mode" and "having mode" (AI really explained it the best, would paste it here but it's somewhat long). You're, in contrast with parent post,
300.
▲
by
js8
9mo ago
With https://code.claude.com/docs/en/skills you kinda can teach new things. And also, I have little doubt Anthropic reads these and future AIs might get trained on the most popular recommendations. Yes, it's
More ›