jrvieira

9 ms·

31.
by jrvieira 1y ago
1000 years from now, i don't think we'll be talking about how today's social media changed the world in the same way we'll talk about the agricultural and societal revolutions we've seen during that time.
32.
by jrvieira 1y ago
> Only if you go there for rage bait content The app is not impartial in the content it chooses to push. I got identified as a target for very specific content and in the context of this discussion, it's the polar opposite of what
33.
by jrvieira 1y ago
The world has always been changing in quantifiable ways. Today's social media has not been more impactful, socially, than printed press, the telegraph, the telephone, television, the computer, cell phones or the internet first were. Cl
34.
by jrvieira 1y ago
How so?
35.
by jrvieira 1y ago
How would 0ver contribute to anything positive here?
36.
by jrvieira 1y ago
_René has entered the chat_
37.
by jrvieira 1y ago
as a former design student, those 2 arguments don't necessarily oppose each other at all.
38.
by jrvieira 1y ago
no, alchemists didn't know about protons
39.
by jrvieira 1y ago
what's in a name?
40.
by jrvieira 1y ago
you already are
41.
by jrvieira 1y ago
I've yet to see strong correlation between the things I'm good at and the things I like.
42.
by jrvieira 1y ago
they know deep down that they don't deserve their status which makes them insecure and needing to constantly defend the narrative that they are in fact better. you'll see this behavior fade in the presence of someone who they them
43.
by jrvieira 1y ago
The author is very confused.
44.
by jrvieira 2y ago
the point is that there should be no layout to be broken in the first place.
45.
by jrvieira 2y ago
Secure contexts, not a part of the html spec, are described in the w3c candidate recommendation, which I can assume you are calling the official standard, which states: >5.1. Incomplete Isolation > >The secure context definition
46.
by jrvieira 2y ago
the internet has become more accessible both to consumers and people trying to sell a product. it has become crowded in "the market" you refer to. but all the good things all still there, and are doing much better than they were.
47.
by jrvieira 2y ago
That's a very simplistic and deficient way of stating a half-truth. The dangers of technology and their ethical implications have historically been a serious consideration in the way we regulate a lot of stuff, from TikTok to nuclear d
48.
by jrvieira 2y ago
you should never trust browsers default behavior 1. not all browsers are the same 2. there is no official standard 3. even if there was, standards are often ignored 4. what is true today can be false tomorrow 5. this is mitigation, not se
49.
by jrvieira 2y ago
we do have such protocols. gopher and more recently gemini are the most popular competing standards
50.
by jrvieira 2y ago
you are both right. the decision to make this change is wrong in the first place
51.
by jrvieira 2y ago
completely defeating the purpose of html semantics in the first place
52.
by jrvieira 2y ago
Access to a healthy vegetarian diet is a luxury only a privileged minority can afford. Saying things like "it's unreasonable to eat meat and fish" a very ignorant in more than one way.
53.
by jrvieira 2y ago
can you provide a relevant example for this context?
54.
by jrvieira 2y ago
"Fractals are not self-similar" https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gB9n2gHsHN4 If you want to learn more about the fascinating world of fractals.
55.
by jrvieira 2y ago
i am guessing that most people think that the cognitive load cost is usually not worth the benefits. i agree that the cognitive load in a language like js which is not prepared to accommodate this paradigm is not worth it even when deciding
56.
by jrvieira 2y ago
I used Affinity tools as a better alternative. Are they not a player anymore?
57.
by jrvieira 2y ago
introducing the concept of mathsplaining
58.
by jrvieira 2y ago
you're worried that they'll explain 3rd degree polynomials with a leftist bias?
59.
by jrvieira 2y ago
first thing i did when i read "3rd degree polynomial" was search "elliptic curve 3b1b"
60.
by jrvieira 2y ago
that's above 12% on both. now correct it for number of sold phones each (estimated by looking at the 70 most popular models) and we'll get why they said 1/4.

More ›