jrochkind1

5 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by jrochkind1 3mo ago

   and yet, it remains, in many subreddits.
2. 32.▲
   by jrochkind1 3mo ago

   It's also like the only place left on the internet to reliably find real people reviewing things with real opinions.
3. 33.▲
   by jrochkind1 3mo ago

   I did not realize that "cyber" had become assumed short for "cybersecurity". So depressing.
4. 34.▲
   by jrochkind1 3mo ago

   In this case, effort has _not_ been put in to make sure the docs are of high quality, and the potential readers know that, which is surely relevant.
5. 35.▲
   by jrochkind1 3mo ago

   thanks! I obv knew less about violins than saxophones!
6. 36.▲
   by jrochkind1 3mo ago

   It's interesting you used both saxophone and violin as your examples, as they are very different historically. Violins are basically ancient and evolved gradually over huge time spans, yes. But saxophones -- invented by a guy named Ado
7. 37.▲
   by jrochkind1 3mo ago

   I haven't been able to see it even setting Chrome developer tools to crazy slow network speeds. Maybe chrome developer tools simulation isn't enough to see it? The observations you are reporting are from images you created yoursel
8. 38.▲
   by jrochkind1 3mo ago

   So it was done on the clock as a project at Developer Relations team, I don't know if that should be called a personal project or not, maybe, it does seem Developer Relations projects could be one person's idea and execution, but
9. 39.▲
   by jrochkind1 4mo ago

   I just immediately went with the arrow keys on my MacBook.
10. 40.▲
    by jrochkind1 4mo ago

    I want to know if this was hand-coded or what; would love a re-usable template to make exhibitions like this! Very good online display of digitized materials with interpretative journey.
11. 41.▲
    by jrochkind1 4mo ago

    What, no plotting on a map?
12. 42.▲
    by jrochkind1 4mo ago

    Are we talking about the same twitter thread? This one? https://xcancel.com/JPoehnelt/status/2069482265953087602
13. 43.▲
    by jrochkind1 4mo ago

    I don't know that I'd call the repo "non-Google-affiliated", but whatever it is, it is still up [1] in a google-owned github organization [2], which also includes several other repos with the line "This is not an of
14. 44.▲
    by jrochkind1 4mo ago

    I don't see anything about the product that made Google leadership look bad? I don't see that anyone else external to Google thought so either, before they fired him? Firing him makes them look bad, however.
15. 45.▲
    by jrochkind1 4mo ago

    I read the twitter thread, don't see any clear information about what the t's and i's even are, or if they were crossed and dotted.
16. 46.▲
    by jrochkind1 4mo ago

    > but yea it's true he didn't dot the i's and cross the ts. How do you know that's true? Do you have information the rest of us don't?
17. 47.▲
    by jrochkind1 4mo ago

    It doesn't look like anything has been taken down.
18. 48.▲
    by jrochkind1 4mo ago

    What about local models do you find preferable? I guess "starting to find them preferable" suggests to me you think they work better, but this is surprising to me so I think I may have misunderstood, so I ask! Like you're say
19. 49.▲
    by jrochkind1 4mo ago

    I see now, thank you!
20. 50.▲
    by jrochkind1 4mo ago

    Why are they being told anything outside of the test? What is that for? Isn't “can you find this bug in this file?” also a test? It sounds like there are two kinds of tests? I'm clearly confused, I realize.
21. 51.▲
    by jrochkind1 4mo ago

    > And, all of the bugs can be identified by several models if they are pointed directly at it and told what to look for. This made me think, well, sure, if you tell them what to look for... but then: > The models can look at the who
22. 52.▲
    by jrochkind1 4mo ago

    Makes sense, and the conclusion would be that the goal of trying to ban or censor tools or information that could be used to exploit vulnerabilities is impossible and counter-productive in the first place. You will end up actually helping t
23. 53.▲
    by jrochkind1 4mo ago

    I admit I hadn't really thought about that before (I don't work specifically in security), but I see your point. But, so... the solution people think is limiting people's ability to discover and patch vulnerabilities, and hop
24. 54.▲
    by jrochkind1 4mo ago

    So the problem is not Fable's ability to exploit, but that they don't want people to have access to it's ability to patch vulnerabilties? Wow.
25. 55.▲
    by jrochkind1 4mo ago

    the former nerd type was based on not having social and economic power. people wit social and economic power are inevitably drawn to be assholes (which is what nerds used to know).
26. 56.▲
    by jrochkind1 4mo ago

    Because encouraging a culture of disrespect and bullying is actually bad for security not good for it. Politely decline, please, no need to be rude because of your (not always guaranteed to be correct) perception of where someone (or some
27. 57.▲
    by jrochkind1 4mo ago

    Shouldn't it get swapped out of RAM if it's not being used for a long time? My understanding was that modern memory management is very good at this, there's no need to be shutting idle things down and starting them up all the
28. 58.▲
    by jrochkind1 4mo ago

    There is no reason you can't be gracious, courteous and polite while refusing to accept or even to review the PR. These things are not tied together. You can also refuse to be bullied by submitters, stop engaging altogether. But bull
29. 59.▲
    by jrochkind1 4mo ago

    The worst part: > In addition, Williamson said that Giovannini (or his agent) had submitted patches that were incorrect and then "replied to objections with LLM-generated justifications that eventually overwhelmed the maintainer int
30. 60.▲
    by jrochkind1 4mo ago

    i wonder if they are running the proxy for external network connections in the VM.