Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jread
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
20 ms
·
181.
▲
Tesla Announces Model S Price Increase
14 points
by
jread
14y ago
|
7 comments
182.
▲
CloudGrade API - compare cloud service performance
(mashape.com)
1 points
by
jread
14y ago
|
0 comments
183.
▲
by
jread
14y ago
US military unclassified systems are a mess... a spaghetti bowl of disjoint networks, operating systems, hardware, desktop and Internet applications designed by a multitude of lowest bid government contractors with little sense for usabilit
184.
▲
by
jread
14y ago
As an aviator in the US military, I'm not surprised. This is common practice. The system in question is for public domain UK aviation charts and pubs. Many of the unclassified systems I use have the user and password taped to the monitor.
185.
▲
by
jread
14y ago
> You're not the only one to bring this up and it confuses me why. The gas infrastructure has already been built. It's a sunk cost. EV infrastructure most certainly is not. EV infrastructure, unlike gasoline, can be piggy backed onto ex
186.
▲
by
jread
14y ago
I’ve been working on some similar analysis with EC2 and other providers. I think the big missing point in this post (acknowledged by the author) is with regards to EBS optimized instances and provisioned IOPS where we’ve observed a dramatic
187.
▲
by
jread
14y ago
You have to careful comparing one specific EC2 instance with other providers. Unlike most compute services, EC2 infrastructure is heterogenous. The c1.xlarge instance compared might deploy to 2 or 3 different chipsets in us-east-1, each wit
188.
▲
Managed DNS Provider Comparison Report
(dropbox.com)
1 points
by
jread
14y ago
|
0 comments
189.
▲
by
jread
14y ago
This isn't unusual, amazon.com uses a combination of UltraDNS and Dyn, not their own AWS Route53 DNS service.
190.
▲
by
jread
14y ago
It won't generally affect the real user test results because of a warmup/training phase in the test when those DNS records would be cached within the recursive chain.
191.
▲
by
jread
14y ago
For direct synthetic tests we do see about 50ms response times in the US. For real user (recursive) tests we see lookups in the low 100ms range.
192.
▲
by
jread
14y ago
I created this DNS test. If your are evaluating DNS services, you might also check out a blog post I wrote last month summarizing the results we've collected from the DNS tests: http://blog.cloudharmony.com/2012/08/comparison-and-analysis.
193.
▲
by
jread
14y ago
I recently did some DNS performance analysis and wrote a blog post about managed DNS services (along with a free report): http://blog.cloudharmony.com/2012/08/comparison-and-analysis... Route53 is a good choice for DNS compared to GoDaddy
194.
▲
The Best DNS: Performance comparisons of Route 53, Dyn, UltraDNS, easyDNS
(blog.cloudharmony.com)
1 points
by
jread
14y ago
|
0 comments
195.
▲
Comparison and Analysis of Managed DNS Providers
(blog.cloudharmony.com)
2 points
by
jread
14y ago
|
0 comments
196.
▲
Kodak suffers blow as patent in Apple, RIM case is ruled invalid
(news.cnet.com)
1 points
by
jread
14y ago
|
0 comments
197.
▲
New Sydney, Australia Edge Location for Amazon CloudFront & Amazon Route 53
(aws.amazon.com)
8 points
by
jread
14y ago
|
0 comments
198.
▲
by
jread
14y ago
Yes this is true on 64 but m1s. EBS IO is still very slow and m1s generally deploy to slower Intel 53xx and 54xx hardware (although this is still often faster than the AMD 2374 you'll get on Rackspace)
199.
▲
by
jread
14y ago
> That's not quite right. The smaller rackspace instances tend to perform better than the smaller EC2 instances (anything below m1.large), especially in terms of I/O. This is true, I mentioned this as a pro in the quota post. However, t
200.
▲
by
jread
14y ago
Linode is a much better choice for VPS. Rackspace cloud currently runs entirely on old AMD 2374 hardware. Sure you get 4 burstable cores for all instance types, but these do not perform even close to as well as 4 core on Intel 55xx or 56xx
201.
▲
by
jread
14y ago
I wrote about this topic on Quora a while back: http://www.quora.com/How-does-Amazon-EC2-compare-with-Racksp... Most of the pros and cons listed there still apply. In it's current form, Rackspace Cloud compute is little more than VPS with
202.
▲
by
jread
15y ago
A linode instance is included towards the bottom of the results.
203.
▲
by
jread
15y ago
We co-locate with their parent company Liquid Web and have conducted extensive testing of their cloud services. They are a very solid service, knowledgable technical staff, very quick support response, great hardware, excellent reliability,
204.
▲
by
jread
15y ago
If you are running additional queries and need a web service token (the site currently only allows you to generate 5 reports/day for free), ping me and I'll send you one for free.
205.
▲
by
jread
15y ago
Here is a CPU performance comparison for the same set of servers. This metric is an approximation of EC2's ECU for other providers (the algorithm uses 16 CPU benchmarks and EC2 instance performance as a baseline): http://cloudharmony.com/b
206.
▲
A few high end cloud server IO performance comparisons
(cloudharmony.com)
33 points
by
jread
15y ago
|
21 comments
207.
▲
by
jread
15y ago
We have also created a report that summarizes and aggregates manged DNS performance and availability globally and regionally, features and pricing. It is still under development, and we intend to sell it in the future, but I'm happy to shar
208.
▲
by
jread
15y ago
If you are evaluating 3rd party DNS, I developed a tool for testing recursive dns query latency here http://cloudharmony.com/dnstest - the test covers most major Anycast providers.
209.
▲
Softlayer announces object storage w/ tagging & search
(softlayer.com)
1 points
by
jread
15y ago
|
0 comments
210.
▲
Akamai to Buy Cotendo for $268 Million to Expand Cloud, Mobile Services
(bloomberg.com)
1 points
by
jread
15y ago
|
0 comments
More ›