jraph

8 ms·

151.
by jraph 4mo ago
> MCP Respectfully screw making users rely on AI for accessibility. Just make the damn page accessible already. Actually, more like make sure you don't break the accessibility that's there by default with correctly written plai
152.
by jraph 5mo ago
I wondered. Sorry :-)
153.
by jraph 5mo ago
Sorry, my English was approximative, I meant that I would need to be sarcastic. But yeah, it does. Of course, sarcasm always works out great with people who don't already get that they are boring you to death with a long monologue...
154.
by jraph 5mo ago
I don't know, I don't mind someone telling me about a dream, if it's not too long. It can be interesting or funny. As always, when one says something, they need to check that the public they have is interested and the public
155.
by jraph 5mo ago
Yet another push to use LLMs after casting fear. Now it should be illegal not to use LLMs. A good start of the day. (I hope casting fear is not UB)
156.
by jraph 5mo ago
Free software licenses and open source licenses are almost the same set, and the difference between the two is not copyleft: the GPL is OSI-approved. The difference is in the spirit, focus, philosophy: free software is concerned about user
157.
by jraph 5mo ago
Open source is not necessarily about helping any programmer, for any endeavor. Actually, my code targets the end users, not fellow programmers. I don't want my code to be used to build proprietary software. I want code built on top of
158.
by jraph 5mo ago
Being a shiny new code hosting platform is not really the point of forgejo though, it's at best a nice side effect. I suppose forgejo is meant to be a lightweight, low maintenance, feature-rich, self-hostable otherwise GitHub-like free
159.
by jraph 5mo ago
I recently moved, and the infra provider of the non-profit ISP I use imposes them a two month delay to set up a new fiber line. During this delay, I met neighbors who accepted to share their WiFi with me. They live a bit far, across the way
160.
by jraph 5mo ago
Indeed! And since your article is not particularly about JS and can be read by anybody, including people not familiar with (modern) JS, I'd argue that the form you used is way clearer than the arrow function form and would probably sti
161.
by jraph 5mo ago
This is a statement vs expression thing. It works as an expression. Try: f = function (v) { return e ; } or (function (v) { return e ; }) Javascript doesn't allow (nameless) function expressions (using the function ke
162.
by jraph 5mo ago
I'm fortunate enough not to have been knowingly exposed to LLM generated code of big enough size yet, and haven't run into studies about this (to be fair, I'm not actively looking for them although I'd be quite intereste
163.
by jraph 5mo ago
It matters whether something is written using an LLM even if we put aside the ethical aspects. Firstly, if your text is deadly boring to read, your point might not get across optimally and one might not just be interesting reading slop. Sec
164.
by jraph 5mo ago
Thanks! From your link: > However, this pattern was found by me by acquiring all playlists from "UUAA" to "UUZZ" and is not officially announced by YouTube. Okay, this was reverse engineered and there's no promis
165.
by jraph 5mo ago
Thanks, I guess I can get rid of my cron task that marks shorts as read in Nextcloud News. How did you find out?
166.
by jraph 5mo ago
Not really. RMS wanted to guarantee user freedom, first and foremost.
167.
by jraph 5mo ago
OP says open source is a reformulation of free software. Stallman created free software and is distinctly against open source, which is more or less free software but without the philosophy, the concern for user rights [1]. Associating RMS
168.
by jraph 5mo ago
https://perdu.com works very well for this. It also still answers to http. Apparently it'll turn 30 years old in a few weeks [1]. It hasn't changed much if at all since its inception. Its very small size makes it perfe
169.
by jraph 5mo ago
> We really need to change this. I don't have a good solution here, but it can not continue that way. Advocacy (against chromium and its forks) is one way.
170.
by jraph 5mo ago
No problem :-)
171.
by jraph 5mo ago
Ah, okay. I see you rephrased.
172.
by jraph 5mo ago
Are Wire, Signal, Telegram backed by mega corps though?
173.
by jraph 5mo ago
DAVx5
174.
by jraph 5mo ago
As a dev, i'd say having to use adb is a minor inconvenience. Still unacceptable, a better option would be to use something like lineage or some other aosp distro without the google services (hoping that nothing makes you dependent on
175.
by jraph 6mo ago
It's not that easy. I agree that supporting Windows helps its ecosystem. But also open source software on Windows is an important gateway to the free world. When you are already used to Firefox, LibreOffice and VLC, you might as well s
176.
by jraph 6mo ago
You can disable probably that nagging. I did. (in France)
177.
by jraph 7mo ago
It's not directly a big issue for us technical people and our own individual usage. Telling people about F-Droid, NewPipe (& forks) or secuso apps will be a pain. People will find free software / software not approved by Googl
178.
by jraph 7mo ago
It is a play on that quote, isn't it? > If you want to go fast, go alone, if you want to go far, go together.
179.
by jraph 7mo ago
What a weird comment, not sure what you are trying to achieve. Any web developer knows how to find the network tab of the web developer tools in any browser including Firefox, and then the throttle option is immediately there. You can make
180.
by jraph 7mo ago
Correct. And certainly not to people and companies who'd like to use my work to deny end users the rights to control their computing. That's the whole point of the GPL to me. The code I release is not an unconditional gift. It def

More ›