Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jppope
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
24 ms
·
331.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
I think the issue here is more about the unintended second order effects. Yay! Drug and alcohol use is down... annnnnnddddd now theres a mental health crisis, increase in suicide rate, and the fertility rate is dropping like well drug and a
332.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
The general sentiment around this phenomenon tends to be that a drop in drug/alcohol use is a positive social change... I'm pretty skeptical of that hypothesis. They also left out that having sex is on the decline and that is 100%
333.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
> "However, the authors argue that KV doesn’t suit all problem domains. Mapping table-like data into a KV model leads to poor developer experience and (de)serialization costs. SQL would be much better, and SQLite being embedded solv
334.
▲
Ask HN: Demos are easy; Engineering is hard. What are you favorite examples?
3 points
by
jppope
2y ago
|
5 comments
335.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
those are the words of a drummer...
336.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
Correct. IQ isn't an effective measurement of intelligence as is typically stated. It is (at best) a measurement of learning disabilities.
337.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
Dan McKinley ("McFunley") is internet famous for a bunch of things including (if I remember correctly) the highest rated Stack Overflow comment of all time. He has a video that I basically share with everyone who's trying to
338.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
Just an observation. If the models are hitting the top of the S-curve, that might be why Sam Altman raised all the money for OpenAI... it might not be available if Venture Capitalists realize that the gains are close to being done
339.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
Seems like you're listing highly regulated industries not human interaction.
340.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
Pretty fluffy article for someone who is a PhD, MEd, (AND Best Selling Author!). I read the first half and skimmed the second half because the author couldn't make a point somewhere in the giant wall of text. Even if there was a point
341.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
question: I'm not a smoker, but would the information be able to be generalized?
342.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
Probably "Zorba the Greek"
343.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
As expected, AI is great for stuff thats been done a million times. AI will slow you down for anything even slightly novel.
344.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
Wired with the click bait.
345.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
Can't help but think about this scene from silicon valley: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzAdXyPYKQo The "no revenue" scene... All OpenAI needs to do is start making some revenue to offset the costs!
346.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
Anti-trust, yes. But also VCs funding a bunch of weak companies early stage for the last several years
347.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
In theory you could Show HN and have your bots upvote it... that would indeed be good marketing.
348.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
Well said. Things change
349.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
AWESOME project. thank you for the inspiration! and the hope!
350.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
Pretty sure Boeing should have failed 3 times by my count.
351.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
Probably something that can be learned from this information, but I doubt the conclusion the author arrived at is correct.
352.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
Maybe just me, but authors gravitate towards certain formats that fit them. Oscar Wilde did great with Dorian Grey but it was nothing compared to his plays. Imagining J.K. Rowling writing a blog feels wrong. I get Gwern's perspective,
353.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
Its obviously not about productivity. We all know WFH is more productive (for people like who amazon hires)
354.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
I for one am shocked. Shocked I say. There are dozens of us surprised by Facebook's actions... DOZENS.
355.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
Not really. I think you would be surprised if/when you cross over to the side of being an employer or maybe even a hiring manager. Its a different job sure (being the employer or directing work) but you and the people doing the work ca
356.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
Ignoring the explicit text which everyone seems to be overly concerned with... I'm not really worried about that. The article makes you think for a second... The thing I like about this article is that you should be concerned with thes
357.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
Other companies know easily what their competitors are paying... you can't leverage labor market competition to bump your salary. You can't start a bidding war between employers.
358.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
So question for HN on this topic: I've always considered salaries not being public to be better for me because historically I've been able to negotiate well when we get to that stage, but I know that this isn't the case for e
359.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
FYI I have a runaway recursive processing when I load the site... it goes down in ~30 seconds or so.
360.
▲
by
jppope
2y ago
thank you... seems like a copy and paste error
More ›