josinalvo

21 ms·

1. 211.▲
   by josinalvo 12y ago

   ? At any rate, I'd prefer to decide myself what is a feature, rather than having some 'ethicist' decide for me.
2. 212.▲
   by josinalvo 12y ago

   So, how could I fix the first example of the paper ? ( https://www.usenix.org/legacy/events/hotpar11/tech/final_fil... , section 2.1)
3. 213.▲
   by josinalvo 12y ago

   see also: http://lesswrong.com/lw/e95/the_noncentral_fallacy_the_worst...
4. 214.▲
   by josinalvo 12y ago

   Sure, they might think that. But I think it is highly relevant to distinguish "speech that offends" and "speech that incites hatred" It might be useful to censor the latter and not the former. The purpose of a "hate
5. 215.▲
   by josinalvo 12y ago

   surprising amount of conclusion from a small amount of fact. I am not even sure time writing is worth optimizing in the first place. BUT the evidence in increased errors and time lost might mean that the cognitive load of writing latex is h
6. 216.▲
   by josinalvo 12y ago

   I dont think that text means what you think it means =P It is in a paragraph saying "different tools for different jobs"
7. 217.▲
   by josinalvo 12y ago

   just to satisfy a possible curiosity: No Your intuition is in the right direction, but not quite correct. Think of a cartesian plot. Now, think of the Y axis "tilted" to the front. With those 2 "vectors" you can still de
8. 218.▲
   by josinalvo 12y ago

   If you are testing A vs notA, and you exclude some scenarios in which A is true (and dont exclude anything else), that is (by definition) evidence for notA and against A. (at least by a bayesian definition) Now, might be that the priors for
9. 219.▲
   by josinalvo 12y ago

   (but it should not be ignored that military targets are generaly considered different, more permissible to kill and harm. Or to seduce. And I think the distintion is resonable)
10. 220.▲
    by josinalvo 12y ago

    The examples the article gives are of shocking violations as well. A good, well written account of some of them should be able to move us just as much. If we found that it did not, that would be worrysome. That they are not written (are the
11. 221.▲
    by josinalvo 13y ago

    Well, they dont seem to have given us the ideas, just the inspiring video. Instead of complaining, someone should write a detailing blog post. (not me though. Dont have the knowledge yet)
12. 222.▲
    by josinalvo 13y ago

    maybe it would be good to have some sort of (general) index of compatibility for consumer products. A one-number thing. "how likely this product is to lock you out of something good". If this information is valuable (and I think i
13. 223.▲
    by josinalvo 13y ago

    damn
14. 224.▲
    by josinalvo 13y ago

    Does that "play" program, with the "anythingby" option, really exist ? I supose it would be possible (indexing metadata). And it would be awesome!
15. 225.▲
    by josinalvo 14y ago

    We should consider that the process of choosing who to vote to has some other benefits (other than the small probability that your vote is the vote that changes the outcome) Mostly, there are two things to do before voting: 1) decide your p
16. 226.▲
    by josinalvo 14y ago

    I have a kindle with a doukan installed. The installation is quite trivial, and there is no more remote wipe. Also it supports pdf ebooks quite well (and djvu, not that well)
17. 227.▲
    by josinalvo 16y ago

    Hi there. I would just like to share my personal view of the 25. As an atheist, I don´t much care about the usual celebration. However, I, too, find there is something worth celebrating: The christmas truce of 1914. Though a religious event