josefx

68 ms·

901.
by josefx 5y ago
> result_dataFrame['yearOverYearMin'] = year_dataFrame.groupby('partId')['unitCost'].min() > result_dataFrame['yearOverYearMax'] = year_dataFrame.groupby('partId')['unitCost&#x
902.
by josefx 5y ago
> Small set of people? The entirety of the US government most likely, any hacker that manages to get onto Mozillas servers, every spy agency worth its money, if its choice of research partners has something to say everyone at Meta. So in
903.
by josefx 5y ago
Could this be considered a GDPR violation? If other posters are correct there is no way to opt out until after the installation and just running the installer already reports back to Mozilla.
904.
by josefx 5y ago
Okay, if I read the court document correctly Section 7 explicitly refers to Section 10 to limit its scope and section 10 is explicitly about things a licensee (You) isn't allowed to do. So it cannot be applied to terms added by the lic
905.
by josefx 5y ago
As far as I understand it was never legally AGPL licensed, it was licensed on a custom license that just happened to merge AGPL and commons clause. The commons clause in this case is not an addition to existing AGPL licensed code.
906.
by josefx 5y ago
I wouldn't be surprised if that "or" clause was added specifically to kill one person post box companies that only exist to carry the risk. Big Tech is very good at throwing empty shell companies at problems that involve payi
907.
by josefx 5y ago
> The BSDs, afaik, do not, That isn't just about the lack of guaranteed stability, as far as I understand it is considered a security feature. System calls that are not made through the libc may be actively blocked. So an attacker c
908.
by josefx 5y ago
The samples on HN might be a bit skewed, its design is after all a bit on the boring side.
909.
by josefx 5y ago
> I mean if this is legal what is stopping me to put a front-end before Google and adding my own value add aka. stripping ads? Google Chrome? I mean they are literally releasing a new version of their browsers plugin API just to break al
910.
by josefx 5y ago
> The problem is the ordering platforms enabling this integration without restaurant consent. The lawsuit seems to focus on the history of how that happened a bit. Namely Google seems to have initially tried to sell this API to restauran
911.
by josefx 5y ago
> Of course trusting one party is better than having to trust two I wouldn't trust Google to block its own ads, it is much harder for them to intentionally fuck up a generic API that can be used by others without raising suspicion.
912.
by josefx 5y ago
I wouldn't be surprised if Googles consent form intentionally broke every GDPR rule. First time I saw it it didn't bombard me with dark patterns, it sent me down a rabbit hole of near infinite options where I couldn't even te
913.
by josefx 5y ago
> based on one of the first point they make being that the method used to predict penetration "overpredicted penetration of tile coating significantly". That point read to me as if they completely overestimated the damage.
914.
by josefx 5y ago
You could have a way to explicitly flag that, instead C will assume that any accidentally silently discarded result can be optimized around with and kick of a landslide of changes that turns bugs ten times worse.
915.
by josefx 5y ago
I just realized I never thought about why System.out.println doesn't declare an IOException. Turns out PrintStream silently catches the exception and turns it into an error flag no one ever checks. Undermining both the Ability to handl
916.
by josefx 5y ago
>user hostility at the behest of corporate America/the music/content delivery industry. Meanwhile the company responsible for the biggest security issues in the last decade still provides its CPU microcode as signed binary blob
917.
by josefx 5y ago
> that Linux, on a default configuration (which means, ISO with Nouveau) To this day I cannot think of a good reason to ship nouveau outside of "lets make users with nvidia cards suffer". I get the idea behind the nouveau proje
918.
by josefx 5y ago
> Wouldn't that mean, though, that the Kytch device could be working around the issue in detriment of the patron's, or "end user", safety? From what I understand the issue the Kytch device solves is the cryptic error
919.
by josefx 5y ago
Just remember you aren't just fucking over your manager but also everyone else in the company and the customers.
920.
by josefx 5y ago
This is just one of thousands of things a land "owner" has to deal with. If you expect to buy a piece of land and own it like some South African dictator then you only have yourself to blame. In some countries you get to deal with
921.
by josefx 5y ago
Java fixed the mutability issue for its generics, you can insert Cats and Dogs into a concrete List<Animal>, but you cannot insert them into a List<? extends Animal>.
922.
by josefx 5y ago
> It doesn't stop the compiler from generating an executable or linking to libraries. The C standard claims multiple definitions result in undefined behavior. Dynamic libraries are filled to the brim with copies of symbols because
923.
by josefx 5y ago
> Your code snippet assumes that your C compiler is just a high-level assembler. But it's not - it executes against a theoretical C virtual machine that doesn't know about about forking. Luckily a C compiler that doesn't k
924.
by josefx 5y ago
X11 has but does XWayland? Or desktops running on it like KDE and GNOME?
925.
by josefx 5y ago
Unless you depend on a central service like X11 where only one version runs on the whole system and newer implementations/replacements may intentionally break things. Last time I had to run some ancient software on Linux I just spun up
926.
by josefx 5y ago
I think they only got past a single reviewer and counted that as success, none of their harm code made it into the kernel proper. However the University also committed thousands of automated "fixes" for linter warnings that weren&
927.
by josefx 5y ago
Please write a JavaScript program that will not deploy to your production system if you accidentally pass a string to any function that expects an integer.
928.
by josefx 5y ago
> That makes it a problem of the FAA. The FCC isn't responsible for policing bad receivers. Ah, yes. The best thing you can have is tribal mentality in your government departments. Where instead of cooperating to sort problems out y
929.
by josefx 5y ago
In the past graphics APIs like OpenGL and old Directx leaked a lot of structural information, so almost every big game release was followed by a driver update where the GPU vendors fixed any bugs in the games that where visible on their GPU
930.
by josefx 5y ago
One of the few times I get to remember that English is only my second language. Can't really think of a reason for not dropping them unless there is a weird corner case in the existing grammar.

More ›