josefritzishere

8 ms·

91.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
That sounds bad.
92.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
Abbott will suddenly be in favor of deregulating all data center construction by December. He has a track record on this.
93.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
Having seen video of police tazing people in the head and neck... I would posit that they are intending to make the tazer as dangerous as possible through misuse.
94.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
This was both hilarious and apropos.
95.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
AI destroys everything. It's such spammy trash.
96.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
What a trashfire of a company. Where are the legal penalties for such reckless behavior?
97.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
TLDR: yes.
98.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
At some point , looking at all the damage, it becomes hard to dismiss Trump as merely unintelligent and incapable. The other possibility is that the destruction deliberate, and the goal to end US hegemony. Would things proceed any different
99.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
More CEOs need to go to prison.
100.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
That sounds like a viable path to ending mass surveillance.
101.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
Doom scrolling is mindless entertainment, probably similar to the change from books to TV. It's not analogous to the loss of cognitive abilities we see with AI.
102.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
Comparing it to Alzheimer's is an allegory. The cognitive loss is already well documented. I might also compare it to Chronic traumatic encephalopathy. But I think more people understand what Alzheimer's is.
103.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
FYI: The rhetorical fallacy here is called a false syllogism.
104.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
I think we need to accept that AI causes cognitive decline, like Alzheimer's. For an Adult this may be manageable, but in a young brain, this is detrimental.
105.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
Why on Earth is this flagged?
106.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
Dupe https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49194758
107.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
This is true patriotism.
108.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
Even Wikipedia spells out that invasive searches require "reasonable suspicion." So we return to the core question... suspicion of what? Suspicion is not a crime. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_search_
109.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
Destroying history is a crime against humanity.
110.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
As people rely more on AI they experience cognitive atrophy. This is measurable in IQ loss, and other symptoms we might otherwise associate with early onset dementia or Chronic traumatic encephalopathy.
111.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
Evidence of what? Destroying evidence assumes he is guilty of a crime which there be evidence of. Our system is predicated on an assumption of innocence. The normal threshold to accuse is a "reasonable, articulable suspicion." Thi
112.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
The US vs Swartz case was abusive prosecution; lawfare in other words. It was completely out of order with the level of offense.
113.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
Steve Jobs was a Fed.
114.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
Correct. If I wanted slop, I'd ask the slop generator.
115.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
This defies Betteridge's law of headlines.
116.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
Private Equity destroys everything.
117.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
At some point Zuckerberg should spend some time in a jail cell. Fines aren't moving the needle.
118.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
I don't understand how Flock can possibly be legal. Unlicensed, warrantless, mass surveillance is not legal. Surveilling before the warrant is not a reasonable work around for the legal threshold, neither is using a third party. In a f
119.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
Unsolicited legal advice - It is best to assume that you are responsible. AI companies are going to ensure through their terms and conditions that you accept all responsibility and fully indemnify themselves from any liabilities they feasib
120.
by josefritzishere 2mo ago
"Civic hygiene isn't about saying we distrust our current government - it's about not trusting the next government." I've made similar points. Granting one government administration more power, is by extension gran

More ›