Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jorgemf
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
41 ms
·
391.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
I am scared of your response, do yo mean we cannot discuss things because of the consequences? even if we try to improve and fix things with the discussion?
392.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
I already saw it and that is why I am asking people here. And thanks so much because I was searching for it and couldn't find it. This is my favorite part (her response): https://youtu.be/cVaTc15plVs?t=1851
393.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
I don't think nurses have an easy job. I don't think I could do it. I am saying people have different skills, for some of them is easier to be a nurse for others to be a CS engineer. I wouldn't enjoy to be a nurse the same wa
394.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
Yes I think so. I have been a teacher and CS engineer so for me it is clear that CS is more stressful. Nurse is something I couldn't do and when I always ask them why are they nurses they say they feel great when they help people and t
395.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
> men think that women aren't there because it's too hard Who thinks that? Hard is something relative. The author says that men could be more prepared to tech because a biological predisposition that makes tech easier positions
396.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
>> Openness directed towards feelings and aesthetics rather than ideas. Women generally also have a stronger interest in people rather than things, relative to men (also interpreted as empathizing vs. systemizing). If this were true,
397.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
> I’m simply stating that the distribution of preferences and abilities of men and women differ in part due to biological causes and that these differences may explain why we don’t see equal representation of women in tech and leadership
398.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
was it harder before? Are you sure? I think your response doesn't change his argument, before tech was less relevant for the economy, so it was less stressful and had less status. That is why it wasn't interesting for men to get i
399.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
I think we split based on gender and race because those are clear discriminators. Height or hairstyle are more fuzzy, and probably biologically less relevants to adapt to the environment. Probably height is more relevant for leadership than
400.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
I think it is clear that he complains the company promote women over men to increase the diversity and that the company should look to the individual skills. That the reason of the difference in the diversity could be biological and not gen
401.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
This guy is saying he would hire the best candidate regardless of gender or other byas. He wont promote women over men just because they are women, he will look at the individual skills and select the fittest for the position. Note: He is a
402.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
Do you think the person who wrote this will survive (not being fired)?
403.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
> I’m simply stating that the distribution of preferences and abilities of men and women differ in part due to biological causes and that these differences may explain why we don’t see equal representation of women in tech and leadership
404.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
I am not sure if you can use the coroutines in javascript, but if you can you don't need React at all
405.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
It depends of they laws of the country where you stay. For example, my country requires me to pay taxes if I live there for more than 6 months a year (180 days). And theoretically you pay taxes where you live at that moment, but if you only
406.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
With text-only webs over 5MB I wouldn't expect less from mobile apps.
407.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
This is a great laptop if you are not using the gpu and the cpu at the same time and you don't care about the screen response. So basically you put a game in this PC and after some minutes you see the great faults of the computer. The
408.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
They care about the money the code/product generate. If it doesn't generate money nobody cares how good it is, when it generates money them you can care about good code and improving things.
409.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
I don't understand how your comment relates to mine. isn't it more or less what I said? you can use the frameworks and copy the examples like using a jpeg compressor for compressing what ever you want. But without the maths it is
410.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
My opinion is that it is a very long-term goal. Compare it to the autonomous car, getting the first 90% of a complete autonomous car is much easier than the last 10%. With AGI probably it is the same. Deep learning has got traction the last
411.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
You can use a framework, copy some examples and "create" your own AI. You don't need maths for it, just follow some steps from the examples. But you only be able to copy other things, if you want to go one step ahead and use
412.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
The first time I heard about DeepMind (months before it was adquired by Google) I though something similar: "winning Atari games with reinforcement learning and neural networks doesn't sound like it is worth 50 millions of pounds
413.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
Can you expand what have Vicarious done?
414.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
> The people who are skilled enough at machine learning/deep learning to receive the grant would be able to be employed at any relevant company for their research. Yes, but maybe some of those people want to work on a side project i
415.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
AI uses more than statistics. Some algorithms doesn't use statistics at all, for example you can build decision trees using information theory instead of statistics. Statistics is a big part of AI, but in most algorithms you will find
416.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
On one hand you have all the information it extracts from non text sources: books, images, audio, video, non English languages, etc. They use machine learning from them. On the other her hand they also use ML in the search engine to underst
417.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
Thanks!
418.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
It depends on the company, they usually don't pay the full meal price. Probably is less and it should be around 1000-1500 a year. I have no idea how are things now with the tickets. (For most people in spain 1000-1500€ is a month salar
419.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
It depends. Some people bring food some go out. But for 10€ is not worth for everybody to wake up earlier to prepare the meal and later have to warm it up in the microwave. You just go out and lunch. Some companies also have a special compe
420.
▲
by
jorgemf
9y ago
As the other commenter said, we also add Alioli, which is mayonnaise with garlic. Although the original one is only garlic and olive oil. (Ali means garlic and oli means oil in Valencian)
More ›