jorgem

29 ms·

241.
by jorgem 17y ago
Can the left over streams be mixed and reused? Since they will have higher salinity and used as a new input?
242.
by jorgem 17y ago
Denied. Patent troll. :)
243.
by jorgem 17y ago
What's the business model?
244.
by jorgem 17y ago
The problem is that they will be broken up "poorly". The bigwigs will keep the good parts, and give the crappy, debt-ridden parts to the government, or let them fail. Kinda like GM (although I'm not sure there were any good parts).
245.
by jorgem 17y ago
I think they would be better off to have tried to charge something , rather than give it away. It's important to validate the pricing and business model -- and you can only do that by selling it (charging for it). But, a good read.
246.
by jorgem 17y ago
Not understand.
247.
by jorgem 17y ago
Actually, in much of the third-world, this is not true. Hand made is cheaper than manufactured . I know it seems ass backwards, but the best examples I know are in Mexico: 1) Guy selling handmade pots (or any handmade product) -- his produc
248.
by jorgem 17y ago
>> it should only take you a day or two to learn Objective-C It's the libraries! Takes a long time to learn them all...
249.
Ask HN: How do I explain copyright to 11-year olds?
3 points by jorgem 17y ago|5 comments
250.
by jorgem 17y ago
The last administration in Washington FOUGHT against science: Stopping stem cell research, blocking basic research into global warming (and solutions), etc. California tried to go it alone on stem cells, at least. We get what we vote for.
251.
by jorgem 17y ago
Until they forward you a mail.
252.
by jorgem 17y ago
Better health care.
253.
by jorgem 17y ago
Cool analysis. Post some photos when you make it!
254.
by jorgem 17y ago
Should be required reading for all our representatives. Or, maybe even for all our citizens :)
255.
by jorgem 17y ago
Taking the car analogy further: Plenty of people buy cars that will go faster than they will ever need to go. The car designer ALLOWS you to do it, even if it's not usually safe. The happy customer knows it's there if he needs it.
256.
Is Twitter the New SPAM?(blog.hotnamelist.com)
3 points by jorgem 17y ago|1 comments
257.
by jorgem 17y ago
Any way to save changes to the browser?
258.
by jorgem 17y ago
It'd be nice if NOSCRIPT could have an option like: "Don't share my browser history with this site". If that option were on, the page just wouldn't have any 'visited' links at all. I could live with that.
259.
by jorgem 17y ago
Maybe you misunderstood the words in my answer because they didn't mean what you think you read... You are free to redefine the meaning of any word you want. But that's what the article was about -- misusing words.
260.
by jorgem 17y ago
Now you know why 78 million COM names are taken. A few here, and a few there. Most doing nothing. I posted an analysis with list of available one-word domains that are left recently: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=480858
261.
by jorgem 17y ago
That's just my point. It doesn't mean that.
262.
by jorgem 17y ago
My favorite: Actionable It used to mean: "affording grounds for legal action" -- that is you can be sued for it. Now, marketing folks (and politicians) use it to mean "something they can do".
263.
by jorgem 17y ago
Is Facebook killing them?
264.
by jorgem 17y ago
I like it.
265.
by jorgem 17y ago
I've found on my site (a different, but similar one) that it is hard to get paid for referring domain name buying traffic. Only a few of the registrars is reliable, and with Godaddy you get the large majority of the traffic. NameCheap, for
266.
by jorgem 17y ago
Yeah. Cops would have loved that. He'd be doing time. (sorry). Which would more than make up for the 20ns
267.
by jorgem 18y ago
The background story seems interesting. Why was this speech not given? In any case, I'm pretty sure that at 18, I wouldn't have "gotten" it.
268.
by jorgem 18y ago
Is a bunch of traffic from one machine really the same?
269.
by jorgem 18y ago
Anyone know of an API to access that trillion word google corpus mentioned in the article?
270.
by jorgem 18y ago
Lets go back further: Between 1933 and 1939, federal expenditure tripled, and Roosevelt's critics charged that he was turning America into a socialist state.

More ›