jorgeleo

12 ms·

61.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
Lots of my work is under very restrictive NDAs, so not much public, all though heavily used internally by my clients.
62.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
I agree about the pissing contest, Just to document the issue: the same way that my sarcasm touched a nerve in you, the comment "Does anyone else even have a desire" can be read as belittling and condescending. But I rather laugh
63.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
I hear you. Instead of thinking about a build system (custom or not), I normally begin by trying to keep the project simple enough that file copy is my build and deploy mechanism.
64.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
<sarcasm> I guess you must still be living in your parent's basement because you must not have many bills to pay </sarcasm> LOL Now seriously: Quite the opposite, I always receive comments on the simplicity of my code.
65.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
Right, because you want to reduce the network traffic by reducing the amount of data traveling, and it allows more frequent round trips updates. The times I got that kind of requirement clients always jump back to a winform/wpf UI clie
66.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
1. To me, it is an SPA as long as you are not updating the whole page every time. The year of the tools has nothing to do with it. 2. I use the tools I use because they work and produce the proper and performant results. To be honest, I don
67.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
Nothing beyond jQuery, Bootstrap at the core. Sometimes some libraries for UI components like datatables.js, or a datetimepicker, but that it is.
68.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
What I understand by SPA: Single Page Application: No need to reload the full page every time, but only to update the proper parts of the UI that has changed. It started with the GMail client and the ability to use AJAX. I like this definit
69.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
Doing SPA commercially for years now, never needed any of those: webpack, babel, gulp, grunt, etc. If the developer understands the technology that they are built upon he will realize that there is no need for them. Surely they add nice thi
70.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
And... nope! 1) Hard and easy are relative terms, You feel it hard because it is foreign to 'you', not because it is intrinsically hard. If it seems hard to you then get comfortable with the new pattern, or create a pattern that i
71.
Non-Traditional Ways to Wake Up Amazon Echo: Black Site
3 points by jorgeleo 9y ago|1 comments
72.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
Agree, the pair username, password can be invalid for 2 reasons: It is the intended user, but the password is wrong It is the right password, but the user is mistyped The login screen has no way to know when is one or the other. The OP wrot
73.
New York City moves to create accountability for algorithms(arstechnica.com)
2 points by jorgeleo 9y ago|0 comments
74.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
NDA
75.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
"Computer science programs don't teach the latest frameworks and trends because they're teaching concepts and theory. The implementation is a side effect. That's why so many CS grads have never used Git." That is co
76.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
This is a very good article, and certainly has a lot to say about being self-taught. I started developing like this but I went for the college degree after, and there is a lot to learn in academics that self-studies will not bring to your a
77.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
WPF and Winforms are already well suited for Windows UI. If you want snappy UI: Winforms; If you want cute designer UI: WPF. I agree with you, why would you want to go to the land were CSS is awesome ( https://ih0.redbubble.net&#x
78.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
If your ideas REALLY solve an expensive problem, then the UI, what the heck, not even stability, matters. There are 2 types of ideas where this is true: * I can make a lot of money using your software that it would be near impossible to mak
79.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
I don't see how it relates. The idea is if I have to choose between simplicity and performance, I shall choose performance. Your example does not make sense because you are not choosing simplicity over performance because the code was
80.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
I was keeping it PG-13
81.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
From Pony documentation: Simplicity Simplicity can be sacrificed for performance. It is more important for the interface to be simple than the implementation. The faster the programmer can get stuff done, the better. It’s ok to make things
82.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
“Event loop” pfff. windows 3.1 was doing event loops before it was cool
83.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
Stripe elements is awesome. The one thing I miss from stripe is help collecting sales tax across states.
84.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
Third!
85.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
i am workibg on exactly this, but not just an access clone but DDD point and click for the web. Any suggestions?
86.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
I don't think that you will call it a "temporary inconvenience" if it were you been in jail for some time.
87.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
Lack of understanding of the business model produce bugs that are much more costly to fix, and TDD cannot catch those. TDD has a place, and finding bugs in production can range from annoying to flat out dangerous depending on the system, bu
88.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
Agree, the initial question was on eventual consistency, not on DDD.
89.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
"Banks have daily lag (pending transactions). They also stop business in the evening and resume in the morning to process all these items. That isn't feasible in a lot of scenarios." I live in the US, and if I got to the ATM
90.
by jorgeleo 9y ago
It really depends on the application. Eventual consistency means that eventually, the databases will be consistent. Some bank transactions, for example, do not have that luxury because it might allow 2 possible answers to the same query if

More ›