Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
joosters
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
91 ms
·
901.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
That's got nothing to do with ether. A simple hash of the code is just as effective (or ineffective) at proving the program is the same. Unfortunately, in reality you quickly run into problems with different compiler versions, optimisa
902.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
OP has clearly not noticed much of the politics and election results around Europe...
903.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
I guess they're "just following orders"...
904.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
What sites are broken by Safari because of its default cookie options? I haven't encountered any.
905.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
All the more reason not to believe in 'code = law'
906.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
Surely the implication is that when you 'burn whatever is behind that UserID' you would delete the records of who DeletedUser4510 was friends with (and who was friends with DeletedUser4510). If all you do is rename someone to De
907.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
I don't know too much about the tech, but live sport has been encrypted for several years now. Here's an anecdote about one sport in particular - UK horse racing. There's a pay TV channel (Racing UK) that broadcasts races liv
908.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
I thought he just did that for image direct links, sorry :(
909.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
https://www.jwz.org/blog/2011/11/watch-a-vc-use-my-name-to-s...
910.
▲
Warranty void stickers 'not valid' in US, says FTC
(bbc.co.uk)
2 points
by
joosters
9y ago
|
0 comments
911.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
Support for gRPC was introduced in NGINX Open Source 1.13.10 (I assume this means it's supported out of the box, but have never tried it myself)
912.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
See the text I cited from the card association’s website. Merchants are only responsible for fraud (in the U.K. at least) if they did not use chip + PIN properly. Who pays for fraud, in the end? Well, the customers pay, of course, since the
913.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
For all the words, I still don’t get your point. The banks introduced an improved system that we can all agree is more secure than the old one, and consumer protection did not change , but apparently you think this makes it worse for the
914.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
Again, I can't see how anything changed. You have a card and you needed a PIN to use it, before and after the chip was added. Smartly dressed bank officials were around in both times. In either situation/time period, banks would c
915.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
From http://www.theukcardsassociation.org.uk/faqs/ : With chip and PIN, who is liable for card fraud? Consumers remain fully protected from the cost of card fraud and are covered under The Lending Code. From 1 Janua
916.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
I can't see how that can be true. Prior to chip+pin, you could still withdraw money from an ATM with a card+pin, so how exactly did the security change? In both cases, you can dispute transactions with the banks, and in both cases, the
917.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
That's just because the browser doesn't handle unicode well. The 'text-only', 'VGA' and 'textmode' are actually irrelevant. The behaviour you are seeing is down to programmer choice/laziness/
918.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
So? It's their job to be the human lookout in the car, not watching a TV screen.
919.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
With most corporate email systems, I'm pretty sure you can't hard delete any message. Sure, it may no longer show up in your inbox but it won't be vanishing off of the compliance logs.
920.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXo0WdlELJk I'm pleased to see that the tech video includes spherical mirrors. As I understand it, all raytracing demos are obliged by universal law to include at least three reflectiv
921.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
This is Uber, who designed systems for remotely wiping entire offices when they thought that the data might be called for by the authorities. Perhaps there will be unexpected 'issues' meaning that such data will have been lost in
922.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
Me too! I cannot recommend this enough. IMO everyone should have this bookmark (or similar). As you say, it's most useful for removing static overlays that just get in the way of page content and take up screen space, but it can also g
923.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
You can’t seriously write an article extolling the virtues of inodes as a way of locating files, without pointing out a very clear weakness: the inode of a file can easily change when an application saves a new version of it! Most apps don’
924.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
Can you give a few examples of the basic mistakes in the book, please?
925.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
You will still hit the same problems they described for some sites. Because some JS has been blocked by your blocker, certain websites will have buttons that just don't work. This is frustrating when those buttons are key things like &
926.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
An actual ping would be more impressive :) Perhaps to be less wasteful, the HTTP request should be a HEAD instead of GET? There’s little point downloading a whole page if you are going to just throw away the contents...
927.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
So what? Do you feel obliged in any way to watch the ads on tv? And yet they pay for the programmes...
928.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
Actually, particular cryptocurrency supply is truly limited, unlike gold, which is extremely abundant in our universe. Depends what you mean by a 'particular' cryptocurrency. There's certainly been no sign of a limit on bit
929.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
But it wasn’t irrational to pay a high price for something that was generally considered valuable, and for which the next person might pay even more. What? That's no way to 'disprove' a bubble. Of course the people buying s
930.
▲
by
joosters
9y ago
Presumably because others could now sue Google for the same reasons, and they would be even more likely to win given the Getty result.
More ›