jongjong

4 ms·

31.
by jongjong 17d ago
Before AI, my worldview was that our monetary system was concentrating wealth in a negative-sum game; essentially; every so often, taking wealth from 100 people, destroying half the underlying value and giving the remaining value with a 2x
32.
by jongjong 17d ago
I'm not worried about AI safety. People greatly overestimate the utility and capabilities of intelligence. I'm not afraid of intelligence, I'm afraid of idiocy.
33.
by jongjong 17d ago
I'm still waiting to get my first revenue from copyright content I created 10 years ago. Not everyone gets instant recognition.
34.
by jongjong 17d ago
We can't abolish it. That would be theft. A lot of people worked very hard based on the assumption that their work would be theirs and that they could monetize it. It would be the greatest theft of human labor since slavery. If we swit
35.
by jongjong 17d ago
>> JS... Because our strawman is a modern (shitty) language This is an attitude I dislike from all these niche language communities. They give each other pats on the back for shitting on the most popular, versatile, compatible and ada
36.
by jongjong 18d ago
Survival is not the problem if the land provides abundant resources. The limiting factor is procreation. Hermits don't tend to have children so they 'die out' as a species but they're fine as individuals. In reality ther
37.
by jongjong 18d ago
My wife and I love British culture, architecture, parks, etc... But compared to Australia, I felt like it was still feudalism over there. It's like everyone knew their place. I could feel the class system; the software contracting 2-ti
38.
by jongjong 18d ago
Part of my motivation for moving back to Australia was because the low population density means I could potentially survive on a hunter-gatherer lifestyle. In the event of an apocalypse, I would probably move back with my parents as they li
39.
by jongjong 18d ago
When I was in Germany a few years ago, I was browsing jobs available in France and most software development jobs were under $55K USD. I don't know how you're supposed to survive on that. You can probably make more money as a wait
40.
by jongjong 20d ago
It's not spam if it's the first time I heard of it and it's useful. It shows they care about their project. This makes me want to try it out even more. Meta and Google can spam their unsolicited ads to a billion users but reg
41.
by jongjong 22d ago
I've been feeling this for years. From my perspective, the purpose of VCs was to: - Waste my time filling out forms to participate in incubators they would always reject me for. - Fund my competitors so much as to drive up CPC for any
42.
by jongjong 23d ago
Voting doesn't work in a low-trust society. You can't trust the custodian of the digital system who tallies the votes. The problem is intractable. The president, who is ultimately decided by the custodians of the voting system, is
43.
by jongjong 23d ago
All well and good if your lifestyle stays the same... But what if it keeps getting worse? Some people want the whole pie, some people want a certain sized slice and some people want nothing. Some will fight to the death trying to get the wh
44.
by jongjong 24d ago
My main concern is that as people lose their jobs and can't find new ones, an increasing number of people may be forced into a life of crime. We need UBI ASAP.
45.
by jongjong 24d ago
I feel like I've been in a recession economy since the day I entered the workforce 14 years ago. The movement of the stock market has had no effect on my reality. It's like two different universes inhabited by two different sets o
46.
by jongjong 24d ago
I recall a time when Google was struggling to monetize ads and then something changed and they started becoming profitable. The narrative was about improved targeting. I think it might have helped a little but I never fully bought this argu
47.
by jongjong 26d ago
I've seen some ugly OOP codebases, but I've seen some very nice ones too. I haven't seen any nice FP codebase yet besides basic APIs. There's a reason why 99% of video games are OOP. That level of complexity is just too
48.
by jongjong 26d ago
Correct, technically they pass copies of the state; which gets cloned at every component/module/function boundary. This protects you from 'spooky action at a distance' which is a real problem which can happen when mutabl
49.
by jongjong 26d ago
In the newer versions of React with Redux, the components are all pure functions and state is centralized and passed down into the components. IMO it's as close as a codebase can be to pure functional programming whilst still functioni
50.
by jongjong 26d ago
Some problems don't require OOP, but most large complex problems do, IMO. Most complex codebases I've seen which were pure Functional Programming were spaghetti code; unmaintainable. What I saw every single time was that the proje
51.
by jongjong 1mo ago
But that's the thing; vibe coders are not developers now. I don't see why the marketing equation suddenly changes whenever a human being is confronted with software tooling. My platform is targeted at non-technical builders. For y
52.
by jongjong 1mo ago
Something I've come to realize, as a software engineer, is that the work I do now is much more nuanced and complex than before. I used to call myself a 'software developer' but now I call myself a software engineer. If I had
53.
by jongjong 1mo ago
A lot of people would be willing to take a significant pay cuts if only they could run their own businesses. But that's not an option for them. This gap isn't accounted for in calculations about economic efficiency. The system rem
54.
by jongjong 1mo ago
I tried to do this with my vibe coding platform "Reduce your token costs by x%" and "Lets you easily control exactly who can access what data", "Full detailed usage analytics so you can see how users are accessing d
55.
by jongjong 1mo ago
$1 million net worth is massive. You can buy a house in a remote place, invest in companies and live off of the investment perpetually without having to work.
56.
by jongjong 1mo ago
I have nothing against humans becoming multi-planetary but this is a luxurious desire at this point in history. We should solve poverty first. This is the kind of project which you do once there are no more problems to solve on earth.
57.
by jongjong 1mo ago
As I was reading, I thought to myself that if Aaron's last prediction market idea doesn't work out, he would probably go insane. This story paints a clear path of 'descent into madness' in a very realistic way. He succee
58.
by jongjong 1mo ago
I thought the story was non-fiction until I got to the point about how the bots attracted real users to Aaron's platform. That part was really stretching it.
59.
by jongjong 1mo ago
I feel like absolutely everything is a PsyOp. I mean look at how many big cities there are around the world, how many millions of people working in office buildings; every single day; thinking, crafting emails, organizing events, coordinati
60.
by jongjong 1mo ago
The problem here is that government regulations don't work. Only punishment works and punishment should be based on number of infringements. So if some poorly discarded packaging is found in a forest by a government official, they can

More ›