johnward

66 ms·

751.
by johnward 12y ago
If anyone is not going to be RA'd it's Watson group. There is a lot riding on the success of Watson.
752.
by johnward 12y ago
It's hard t believe NFL players can maintain that size without some type of help. There is definitely a lot of unreported PED usage going on.
753.
by johnward 12y ago
I don't think I've seen a bonus since being acquired. This had to be years ago.
754.
by johnward 12y ago
I am going to remember this acronym
755.
by johnward 12y ago
Yeah most of what I read seems to indicate you should be on the high side in your early twenties but ultimately if you are at 400-500ng/dl and you don't have symptoms that is probably normal for that person.
756.
by johnward 12y ago
I don't know much about pellets other than I have read forum postings about people not liking them and I prefer injections.
757.
by johnward 12y ago
The issue that athletes abuse the drugs seems like a problem the athletic association/league/body should prevent instead of classifying anabolic steroids as schedule III drug.
758.
by johnward 12y ago
That's a great documentary. If you haven't heard of it: http://www.biggerstrongerfastermovie.com/
759.
by johnward 12y ago
If you are at that level you could become an IBM Distinguished Engineer. Basically at IBM you don't have to move to business to make it to a very high level. You can remain an engineer and keep doing the work you like and are best at.
760.
by johnward 12y ago
I am working with a fertility clinic but it's a standard lab test. You do your thing in a cup and they run it through some tests for count, motility, shape, etc. They want more than 15m sperm per ml. I had initial tests on 0, 2m, 5m. A
761.
by johnward 12y ago
I'll try to find the ones I was referring to. In general absorption rate on the skin is poor. From experience weekly shots are much better for me.
762.
by johnward 12y ago
I believe he said he got close to 1000ng/dl naturally, which I consider on the high side based on lab ranges. 400ng/dl is actually interpreted by some doctors as low depending on symptoms even though it's "in range"
763.
by johnward 12y ago
I took weekly shots at 100mg. Cypionate is usually prescribed in the US. Enthate everywhere else. Monthly is way too long. Most doctors recommend every two weeks. However, there was a new report ( http://rd.springer.com/chapt
764.
by johnward 12y ago
Yep see and endo and urologist. I had a mri of the brain to rule this out.
765.
by johnward 12y ago
They want to cut some fat and they have a lot of fat to cut. Many of these people have skills that are outdated and they have not kept up with the times. Are you going to take someone from a hardware group and just throw them into a softwar
766.
by johnward 12y ago
Studies have shown that creams are pretty terrible. Especially if you happen to have thyroid problems. They seem to work at first and then fade out for a lot of people. Shots just simply work and are cheaper.
767.
by johnward 12y ago
The original poster had High T levels to start with. Maybe he didn't notice much of a change. I noticed a significant change going from <120ng/dl to 500ng/dl (still less than OP). I always drop weight when I am on T and ge
768.
by johnward 12y ago
" I didn't get huge muscles or less body fat with more testosterone (huge myth that I thought would change for me)". For me I almost always drop 20lbs on T and am much leaner than I am off or on clomid. On clomid I generally
769.
by johnward 12y ago
I'm 28 now and I have hypogonadisn and have experience using T and other options like clomid. My total T was <120nd/dl. The lab range for this is usually 300-1000ng/dl. I was severely depressed. Moody and very angry. I exp
770.
by johnward 12y ago
From what I understand; They are getting rid of employees in low performing areas and hiring in growth areas like CAMMS (cloud, analytics, mobile, social, and security) and Watson.
771.
by johnward 12y ago
Worked for other megacorps including IBM. Can confirm.
772.
by johnward 12y ago
I'm no financial analyst but I see a lot of "downs" in the Q4 earnings report: http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/45884.wss
773.
by johnward 12y ago
It seems to me that to get rid of that many people they would sell an entire business unit (like the size of GBS) instead of laying all those people off and paying severance.
774.
by johnward 12y ago
Reinstating bonuses for execs after several years of poor performance...
775.
IBM brings back bonuses for top execs even as profits slide(cnbc.com)
1 points by johnward 12y ago|0 comments
776.
by johnward 12y ago
I know there are a million things I would do if I didn't have to work.
777.
by johnward 12y ago
I agree that it's unlikely. Even if they would want to get rid of that number of people it would take years. Plus you would think they would try to sell off a part of the business instead of laying off so many people and paying out sev
778.
by johnward 12y ago
As an IBMer I still cannot understand how the "IBM Alliance" can have a website from '95.
779.
by johnward 12y ago
There are still quite a few of US.
780.
by johnward 12y ago
It's not the end of Feb yet so how do you know he isn't right? Also there is still a chance they plan to get rid of a large number but are avoiding the negative PR but staggering it.

More ›