johnnyfaehell

14 ms·

91.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
I believe that was a civil way to point out to someone that they're not coming across completely lacking knowledge on a subject and that they're coming across as a try hard. Personally, I believe that not stating this in scenarios
92.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
Just curious why you think upholding copyright is a travesty?
93.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
This is a good idea in large companies but the only time I've ever seen this implemented was when a developer wanted who wanted to become lead dev so started hogging permissions to things and set up an internal packagist that only he c
94.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
To backup the point of the iPhone is the gateway to their ecosystem. They increased the size of the iPhone and I stopped buying new iPhones, since then I've switched from an iPhone to Android, Macbook to Dell XPS, and iPad to a bog sta
95.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
I'm not sure about how the contracts are but some contracts (I've heard of UK ones) it's a cost per prisoner. So if the prison holds 300 prisoners the company is owed money for 300 prisoners. I've heard of some that are
96.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
Ok, you're a YouTuber with no technical knowledge, how do you get a WordPress site? Pay for hosting, pay for someone to build you one, etc. Then you have to maintain that site, keep it secure etc. Again, you have no technical knowledge
97.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
Yea, but Apple has support. Google doesn't really do support.
98.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
To be fair, most of the videos I see of the US Police abuse is generally caused by the fact they're afraid. Then you watch the documentaries and interviews and see a constant re-enforcement of that fear. It's like they're tra
99.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
Who talks about US police being brave? Normally I hear the oppisite.
100.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
Especially when it's a major product and you literally have thousands of engineers.
101.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
I think they were using their catch-all for non-transactional/newsletter emails. I have a catch-all for websites and then another that I give to people to email me on. This lets me see emails sent to me by a person easily while having
102.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
Do you mean don't run your own Jenkins or build your own CI system?
103.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
GitHub Actions is just GitHub implementing features others have had for quite a while. So I guess, GitHub Actions is a validation of their features. I think GitHub Actions is picking up because of how big GitHub is.
104.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
Other than it being funny, no it means nothing.
105.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
I think the main reason they don't try is for Atlassian the enterprise market is the most important market. How many enterprises really care about the free tier? Also aren't free tier customers the most costily in terms of support
106.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
> Do you think your scrum master is done after the stand up? Oh no, there's a lot more to do. You know scrum master doesn't do development, they do project management work. Their entire job is to make sure the project is not im
107.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
Yes, refusing to do things that are technically bad is a technical matter hence a developers job. And what happens if you say no, they either go find a developer who will do it (seen that so often) or they go to the CTO/Engineer Manage
108.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
I think I've been misunderstood, I'm not advocating people to quit being a developer. I was pointing out that what the person was originally suggesting is actually start doing non-development work. > where as a developer they c
109.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
Basically, stop doing development work and start doing Project Management, Product Management, Business Analysis, etc.
110.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
For me, everything is about, that it could be harmful. And that's true it could be. Lots of things could be harmful. But right now, it's not really provable by anyone that it is. What we need is proper laws to control what compani
111.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
No... That would be banks and governments with decades of lax tax laws. This wasn't created overnight, 2008 just highlighted it.
112.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
> Would you say that the current political climate has been harmful? I would. I would not only say that, but I would also say that it's come about specifically because of data collection practices which have enabled data analysis of
113.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
What harm came from that exactly? More people voted? Is voting harm? Just because you don't like the way someone voted doesn't make it harmful. My understanding is the entire Cambridge Analytica thing is about privacy and not actu
114.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
I didn't assert that anything was truthful? And prove the "harm" in its data collection practices. Since you've been very specific in data collection, I will expect your response to be about data collection.
115.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
> It's the "no one is harmed" part I strongly disagree with. I can't prove a negative. So you would have to prove the positive, what harm came from this app?
116.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
Ok, in the developed world. And it really isn't. The US might be the worlds richest Country but in many areas, it's like a developing nation.
117.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
> I struggle to see how software developers can willingly do work on a project that goes against all values and morales! Personally, this doesn't really go against my morals or values. They installed the app. No one forced them to.
118.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
> There are legal rights that are protected to the extent that you cannot waive them Yes. This is entirely about "legal rights". Why would you assume otherwise? And the right to go to court, the right for the law of the land to
119.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
> the problem an acquirer has is porting the existing users over to a new messaging infrastructure. If you're selling it, it would be your job to port it. This wouldn't be the purchaser's job, it would be Facebook's
120.
by johnnyfaehell 8y ago
Waiving your rights is about removing future options. Since you're agreeing not to do something. That is not an obligation and the requirement do something. Not the inability to do something. One is an action the other is inaction. If

More ›