johnisgood

6 ms·

31.
by johnisgood 4mo ago
If I vibe code a project, that involves docs and tests as well. Obviously I do not, at any point, do anything blindly and there are some iterations for everything. I always double-check, and I do not use "agents", I do everything
32.
by johnisgood 4mo ago
I really was just commenting on the "Only libc is dynamically linked" bit. But yeah, there are cons and pros of dynamic vs static. :)
33.
by johnisgood 4mo ago
Yeah, seems like everything just seems minimal, but not actually is.
34.
by johnisgood 4mo ago
If the binary still depends on libc.so.6 (glibc) at runtime, then it is not a fully static binary (read: not a static binary). It is a dynamically linked executable, albeit one where most non-libc dependencies have been statically linked. I
35.
by johnisgood 4mo ago
Off: I thought I am becoming dumb, but this really puts me in a new perspective. The odd thing is that even people who work in IT hold similar beliefs. I am not entirely sure what is going on. Favoring a language so blindly seems like a thi
36.
by johnisgood 4mo ago
No, it does not depend. Your parent is correct with his analogy. Linux package management is solved, if it depends on something, it depends on the specific Linux distribution, but "Linux" package management is definitely solved.
37.
by johnisgood 4mo ago
Yeah, this is what the people who have parroted "Rust is safe" have achieved. Rust is not "safe" in the broader sense of the word, only "memory safe". You have to implement the security yourself!
38.
by johnisgood 4mo ago
I agree. I like the website, looks minimal, but minimalism is not reflected in the stack.
39.
by johnisgood 4mo ago
Same... I am left handed and I use the mouse with my right hand, and WASD would have been much more ergonomic.
40.
by johnisgood 6mo ago
I like darcs, so I am rooting for pijul. https://pijul.com
41.
by johnisgood 6mo ago
You have shifted from "very easy not to infringe" to "don't infringe frequently", which concedes the original point that humans can and do produce infringing code without intent. On independent creation: you are con
42.
by johnisgood 6mo ago
It is unnecessary, and it was an obvious offense, not defense. Of course it is "bad". We (Trump) need(s) to stop creating wars and fucking up the economy, while killing others. It is bad all the way down.
43.
by johnisgood 6mo ago
> Right now it's very easy not to infringe on copyrighted code if you write the code yourself. Humans routinely produce code similar to or identical to existing copyrighted code without direct copying.
44.
by johnisgood 6mo ago
Yeah, there is no way they need $1M for the servers, come on...
45.
by johnisgood 6mo ago
I do not understand the fixation on authentication/signatures. They have different threat characteristics: You cannot retroactively forge historical authentication sessions, and future forgery ability does not compromise past data, and
46.
by johnisgood 6mo ago
Now give an excuse for pushing so hard for docker on FreeBSD.
47.
by johnisgood 6mo ago
Most of their issues have been solved a long time ago, with 1000x less code. It is depressing at this point. I really had no clue IT was in the shitters this much. I knew it was theatrical but I had no idea that it was by this much.
48.
by johnisgood 6mo ago
Indeed a sad state of affairs.
49.
by johnisgood 6mo ago
All of them are really, REALLY bad.
50.
by johnisgood 6mo ago
Please read the LLM output critically instead of doubling down on it. Your defense-in-depth framing makes no sense. If .git/config or similar mechanisms are the attack vector, then adding more editor safeguards would be treating a symp
51.
by johnisgood 6mo ago
Right. I am surprised to see this considered to be an RCE. Or a "mad bug" worthy of being here on HN. sighs . Pretty sure a lot of people have spent lots of tokens into finding RCEs in vim and emacs, he is not the first person to
52.
by johnisgood 6mo ago
I would not mind remyelination + being on a DMT, heh.
53.
by johnisgood 6mo ago
That is 3D chess level type shit. xD
54.
by johnisgood 6mo ago
Yes timout indeed!
55.
by johnisgood 6mo ago
Jeez, that makes me feel old, and I am "only" just barely in 30. :( Remember https://web.archive.org/web/20050204100149/http://cia.navi.c... BTW? For the uninitiated: https://web.arc
56.
by johnisgood 6mo ago
LOL I remember that stance. A good one! I have never owned a GitHub account post-M$. :/ Mainly because I always knew Microsoft has always been against FOSS.
57.
by johnisgood 6mo ago
I have no skin in the game but that is a very charitable perspective.
58.
by johnisgood 6mo ago
And it should be "--" to begin with, i.e. "--hard".
59.
by johnisgood 6mo ago
I have done "Initial commit"s after having almost finished something. Sometimes fter >10k lines. Totally unrelated to LLMs, as I have done it years ago as well, and has nothing to do with LLMs. I see why you would think what yo
60.
by johnisgood 6mo ago
You are not alone in going down a dark path thanks to the advice of family and friends. FWIW I am using public LLMs with a friend's depressive thoughts and it is not doing what is claimed in the article, so I dunno. Also I am in a rela

More ›