Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
joesb
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
31.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
Changing jobs to get more pay doesn't neccessarily means you have to work harder though.
32.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
Not all job that pays more requires you to sacrifice your life. I would even argue the other ways that jobs that pay more usually require less from you, leaving you with more time to be with yourself and your family.
33.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
Twitter using Rails to grow to the point where Rails became the problem was actually Rails's selling point. If you ever grow to the point where Rails is your problem, then you have money to solve that problem. But if Twitter hasn'
34.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
Which is debunked.
35.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
Then they are still wrong. It's just that they are wrong in the part that you don't care about.
36.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
Moving cursor using arrow key vs using hjkl is no way comparable to not knowing arithmetic. That's like some fanboy comparison.
37.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
It's just micro-optimization that doesn't matter. Thinking that you require perfect memory to use arrow keys while programming is just hyperbole.
38.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
Article like this is like how a fortuneteller works. It's vague and can be interpreted in many ways. > Put off the correct, hard work for the easier, less effective work? What's correct? How does that not conflicts with "f
39.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
What's the correct answer for this? Is it definitely a rabbit regardless of the orientation. Or is it definitely a duck regardless of the orientiation? I still fail to see how human brain only fall for this illusion once.
40.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
Even if you have `package-lock.json`, if there's new patch version of packages that still satisfy the version spec. NPM will install new version of that package on your machine and silently update your package-lock.json file. Until r
41.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
So your problem is because it taste worse, and not like chicken. Your problem is not because it's made from vegetable.
42.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
Why must I not fake it? Who cares? If someone wants to eat meat substitute, who are you to tell them otherwise? You sounds like when the LED lightbulb that reduces energy usages of the old light bulb by 100 times, you will say "Why fak
43.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
> People must think about why they are hearing about something and the layers and goals that are behind it and drive it. The truth can be benefitial though. So "the drive" for spreading information doesn't necessarily mean
44.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
So no one should ever see example of when things get complicated?
45.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
It's the same with how people think the pasts didn't have as much crimes. It's because you didn't knew about it. All companies had their own way of hacking and making their system worked. But they didn't share it. T
46.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
Server-driven UI rendering and React-Native isn't mutual exclusive though. Server can still render a React-Component-tree-like structure that will then be used in the client to render the actual component in react native. This gives y
47.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
And what do you think React can do that jQuery cannot? Heck, what do you think React can do that standard HTML5/JS API cannot do? React doesn't offer new functionality to do UI. It offer new ways to think about the problem. Hooks
48.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
Hooks offers nothing new over HoC and FaC the same way React offered nothing new over jQuery and EmberJS.
49.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
It's no longer about function. It's a component that happens to use `function` as an implementation detail.
50.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
If you have a stack machine, when you write a function like this. function foo() { let x = 1; let y = 2; x + y; } Your code already depends on ordering. x is on the stack first. y is on the stack second.
51.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
Think of series of `useXXX` as declarations, not function calls, then everything will make sense to you. The declaration parts are always static and in the exact same order for the same component. When you see a state less function To
52.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
On one hand, I kinda agree with you. On the other hand, I usually stop and inspect myself whenever my reasoning that something is bad is not because it hurts me, but because I can't accept to see others improve. Good rule of thumb is t
53.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
We already commercialize children with all toys, private school, video games.
54.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
Do you also assume that every single Web framework in the world are forked from single code base because they are all HTTP-compatible, too?
55.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
While I'm leaning to open-office and willing to keep this article in mind for future office set up, some part of the article reminds me how you can use same event to derive a complete opposite conclusion. "Open office is a clear m
56.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
It doesn't even matter if the call order change. Your code will be restarted. It's the same implicit call order you have when a language runtime allocate local variable on stack.
57.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
When you declare a variable in your code, the variable is actually allocated a slot on the stack, which means there are implicit call orders when you declare a variable. There's nothing wrong with implicit call order when you only call
58.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
Your examples have nothing to do with whether you use Chrominum engine, though. Say that Chrome implements a web feature you don't like. MS use their own MSengine for their Edge browser that doesn't have that feature. But websites
59.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
> If there is a job, say museum docent, that the majority of qualified people would love to do then the salary of that job will approach $0. Sure. But then you are assuming that what I love is what other people love. If there's only
60.
▲
by
joesb
8y ago
You mean user name and password?
More ›