Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
joepie91_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
68 ms
·
631.
▲
by
joepie91_
12y ago
I'm just going to wait and see how things go. I generally improvise; there's not really much prior work (let alone documentation) on the way I run projects, so it's mostly just a matter of figuring stuff out as I go along. On
632.
▲
by
joepie91_
12y ago
Both require accounts to upload files. EDIT: And both are more involved than just dragging and dropping a PDF.
633.
▲
by
joepie91_
12y ago
On smaller screens, it should automatically move the entire sidebar to be a (relatively thin) footer bar instead. I should probably make the top bar shrink in height at that point as well. I suspect you might be just slightly above the cut-
634.
▲
by
joepie91_
12y ago
I suspect that might be caused by pdf.js. While PDFy itself will attempt to send you a cookie (even if you just try to download the PDF), it should still work even if the cookie is rejected, as it's not dependent on it for serving the
635.
▲
by
joepie91_
12y ago
I probably should've worded that better, but that text will be changed/moved/removed in the near future anyway. The Imgur comparison really only refers to the upload/sharing process, not the non-commercial bit. As for ru
636.
▲
by
joepie91_
12y ago
Hi, PDFy owner here. I've been running a number of services for 3 years now, without running into financial problems (see http://cryto.net/ , http://cryto.net/~joepie91 , http://cryto.net/
637.
▲
by
joepie91_
12y ago
Some sort of reproducible version control chain is essential for any kind of privacy- or security-related application. It makes auditing about a hundred times easier.
638.
▲
by
joepie91_
12y ago
It was already posted elsewhere in the thread, but here you go: http://pdf.yt/ Free, open-source, embeddable, ad-free, and accessible to anybody. Disclaimer: I'm the creator of PDFy.
639.
▲
by
joepie91_
13y ago
The style of that very strongly reminds me of that David vs. Goliath top-down shooter game: https://icreviews.files.wordpress.com/2007/02/giving_goliath... Any connection to that, by any chance? EDIT: Hmm, HN do
640.
▲
Show HN: PDFy – an Imgur for PDFs
(pdf.cryto.net)
2 points
by
joepie91_
13y ago
|
0 comments
641.
▲
Why you should stay away from Unseen.is
(cryto.net)
2 points
by
joepie91_
13y ago
|
0 comments
642.
▲
by
joepie91_
13y ago
Many exchange directly to local currency. Not all do.
643.
▲
by
joepie91_
13y ago
Then a good start would probably be to not generalize "Bitcoin supporters" yourself :) On a more serious note, there might be a group of 'supporters' who are 'libertarians', but the reality is that their existe
644.
▲
by
joepie91_
13y ago
> At the very least the definition of currency ought to change to something like: "A currency possesses at least 3 out of 5 of these qualities. Actually, if you look at the definition of "currency" from various sources, yo
645.
▲
by
joepie91_
13y ago
> A really big factor is that people get upset when the number describing their wages goes down. I doubt whether that is still the case in a (hypothetical) economy that is largely deflationary. In the current context, sure - but to me th
646.
▲
by
joepie91_
13y ago
> It's supposed to be a currency, but no one's actually using it for currency. They're just gambling on it, hoping to take advantage of other people's mistakes to make their own money. It's a zero-sum game, and i
647.
▲
by
joepie91_
13y ago
> "at times like this i wish the supporters of bitcoin hadn't wedded themselves so thoroughly to libertarian ideology." "Bitcoin supporters" are not a homogenous group.
648.
▲
by
joepie91_
13y ago
All of them are wrong. See also https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7373804 EDIT: They are uneducated, in that any cursory research into the concept and history of Bitcoin would make it blatantly obvious that his remarks a
649.
▲
by
joepie91_
13y ago
His remarks are uneducated, not the person himself. I don't know him as a person well enough to judge that.
650.
▲
by
joepie91_
13y ago
Everything that knows the concept of an "early adopter", has "elements that are definitely Ponzi". That doesn't make it a Ponzi scheme.
651.
▲
by
joepie91_
13y ago
I don't see how a deflationary currency is a problem. As far as I can tell, the only ones who benefit from the "money has to be in constant circulation" adage, is those who gain a profit off every transaction made. Money is m
652.
▲
by
joepie91_
13y ago
Odd. I certainly recall these points being covered there (or somewhere on the wiki, anyway), but the closest I can find now is a passing remark in https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Myths#Shopkeepers_can.27t_serious... ... In
653.
▲
by
joepie91_
13y ago
"Expert" or not, the arguments he's making here are not only obviously wrong, but also almost certainly uneducated. Judge what somebody says, not who he is.
654.
▲
by
joepie91_
13y ago
Might as well post my comment here as well... -- It would be great if economists started coming up with genuine criticism regarding Bitcoin, rather than obviously false statements, misunderstandings that have been corrected a million time
655.
▲
by
joepie91_
13y ago
Be aware that they also have a different attack surface, and are likely more notorious/interesting than you as a single person. While I agree that keeping control over your own security is a good thing, the comparison you're makin
656.
▲
EC-Council – A Lesson in Bad Incident Response
(s.arciszewski.me)
1 points
by
joepie91_
13y ago
|
0 comments
657.
▲
by
joepie91_
13y ago
Not really. A year ago, it had already been crap for quite a while... it just still had a sizable club of apologists saying "don't be so hard on them, they've done so much good".
658.
▲
by
joepie91_
13y ago
Author here. Had to register a new account, as I lost the password to my original account a while ago. Addressing a few of the points made in the comments here... > You're hypocritical because you just wasted time writing that post