joe5150

59 ms·

1. 571.▲
   by joe5150 14y ago

   More dishonest than pretending that an iPod shuffle, which has no screen (and at one time no buttons!) and is functionally tethered to a real PC, is some kind of entry-level computer/grand charitable effort by Apple to make a computer "for
2. 572.▲
   by joe5150 14y ago

   As much as I agree that it can be a pain to edit a document or watch a video or, god forbid, write a computer program on a netbook, I can't help but feel that it would be more difficult on an iPod Shuffle.
3. 573.▲
   Aaron Swartz: Why I Am Not Gay(aaronsw.com)

   1 points by joe5150 14y ago|0 comments
4. 574.▲
   by joe5150 14y ago

   Well, you're probably right about that, in that case.
5. 575.▲
   by joe5150 14y ago

   Failing to understand that an in-camera DPI of 240 doesn't correlated to a print DPI of 240 is not "innumeracy". It's frankly the logical and intuitive thing to assume.
6. 576.▲
   by joe5150 14y ago

   I don't know if that's necessarily related to not performing well in algebra as much as it's related to not understanding some relatively complicated technical details. Which is inexcusable if these people are claiming to be professionals,
7. 577.▲
   by joe5150 14y ago

   I think you're actually the one misunderstanding here. The "72 DPI" that's output to EXIF doesn't actually mean anything since the actual resolution is dependent on the display medium. The camera produces a fixed number of pixels and your L