Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jmye
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
241.
▲
by
jmye
7mo ago
Was going to cynically suggest they were just going to merge the two sites and then pretend they had higher user counts at their next earnings, but adding even more (better?) fake content is probably the more plausible idea.
242.
▲
by
jmye
7mo ago
> It's only weird stance if you are completely retarded What a disgusting response. Please, please grow up.
243.
▲
by
jmye
7mo ago
> Don’t enable them. Let it wither. Then why consume the stuff at all? What a weird stance. "They're all vile and evil, but I like watching shows, so whatever, tee hee - piracy is morally good now as long as I have this invente
244.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
What a weird comment about a computer that seems to be targeted at students.
245.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
> Prediction markets should just be globally illegal. 100%. But you’ll get yelled at by the “freedom to do literally anything I want, no matter how detrimental to everyone else it is” crowd.
246.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
> Knowing that high-level DOD official were betting on us invading Iran does us no good if the only reason we invaded Iran was so they could win their long-odds bet. Of course it does, if we’re willing to do ever-so-slightly more than je
247.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
Yeah, my first thought was, "Isn't this what recruiters are supposed to be providing?" And like, sure, there are some terrible ones. But I've worked some incredible groups, too.
248.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
What an odd question. Is this just the "and yet you participate in society" meme trying to act as insightful conversation, or did you have something to actually say?
249.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
"Many people" "a lot of long-standing problems getting solved" Weasel words. How many? Who, specifically? Which problems have actually been solved and aren't just "solved" via people metaphorically standin
250.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
People are largely unaware of the sources of those price increases, at least in the US, which is why they were such a successful bludgeon in recent elections.
251.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
My country mines rare earth metals. Your country processes them into computer chips. Joe and Jane's country want those computer chips to fuel their economy. Who's getting fined, here? Me, because mining the stuff is inherently dir
252.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
Given the long-term, widespread usage of coffee, is there something specific they're waiting on? Or is that an "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" thing? Your final statement doesn't really add value without
253.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
> mode of administration and how quickly it peaks in your bloodstream cannot be hand-waved away like that. Then surely you have some evidence, especially that caffeine is more addictive, rather than "hand-waving it away" via pe
254.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
> Workaround: I'm rich and would just start up a newspaper that gave my candidates good coverage. Or buy Twitter.
255.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
> I don't understand why are you downvoted. Are people in this thread really pulling out a laptop and trying to get it connected (or pay for one with a cellular modem) every time they need to respond two words to an email, call a ub
256.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
> how someone can work for a company like that and maintain possession of a soul I mean, they don’t. There isn’t a single decent person who has ever worked at Meta, and that started long before this nonsense. The entire company is abou
257.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
Yes, cops will jump right on someone getting slapped. That definitely sounds like reality. Good call. Do you guys ever like, go outside?
258.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
It’s weird how y’all are so desperate to catastrophize responses, and then want to call other people “internet badasses”. Look in the mirror next time you tell someone they’re going to get shot, bud. You’re the problem.
259.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
Bullshit. That's internet incel horseshit. Have an actual conversation. Get to a point where your sole, entire intention isn't just to con a woman into sleeping with you, and where you like, maybe want to get to know her. Lose t
260.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
And it's less threatening - there's a defined end-point for people. In like, 2 minutes, they'll never have to see you again.
261.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
What a bizarre perspective. Have you never gotten any personal value out of a single conversation in your entire life? Have you never made a friend? I don't understand this "all conversations are bad and useless" nonsense. Wh
262.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
Man, how many "hey, how are you"s do you think are ending in a black eye ? What ridiculous hyperbole.
263.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
I mean, why does it ruin your day? It's just some random person - you'll likely never see them again, or you'll know to avoid them in the future. Why is the opinion of some rando weighing on you so much?
264.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
I think it frequently depends on the thread you're reading and your expertise in that area? There are a few things I'm intermediate to expert in - frequently the quality of comments in those threads is quite poor, but the noise &a
265.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
I don't understand the scare quotes. Do you think pain doesn't exist? Do you think pain shouldn't be treated? What is it you're actually trying to say without having to say it?
266.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
> There is a big unknown. Because some dude with no health or nutrition background said uninformed things, that he isn't qualified to have opinions about, on the internet? Come on, now.
267.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
None of them want that. Meta actively hates you. Google doesn’t want data privacy. Neither does Apple, even if they aren’t overtly abusing it for advertising. Why would any of them push for more privacy? Their users largely don’t care (or t
268.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
This seems like a distinction without difference, given everyone in the ecosystem takes that "opinion" as true fact, including the market-leading browser produced by the "opinion"-haver. I get that's mostly what cor
269.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
> It's most definitely a serious comment from a serious person. It literally isn't, no matter how many lies you make up about it. What politicians did in the 90s has no relevance today and pretending they're the same is, a
270.
▲
by
jmye
8mo ago
> Who cares? There's no way this is a serious comment from a serious person. > everything to do with the genocide of slavs Confirmed, unmitigated botfarm horseshit.
More ›