Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jmye
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
91.
▲
by
jmye
5mo ago
Or I can fight to rezone that land because a single pass of zoning, shockingly, isn’t fucking permanent. Y’all do vaguely understand how government works, right? Planning and zoning is a core function. This is hardly rocket science, except,
92.
▲
by
jmye
5mo ago
> Datacenters bring millions in tax revenue Source?
93.
▲
by
jmye
5mo ago
> Plus there’s the usual angle of people not wanting to hire someone that’s willing to publicly trash their current employer. Will you be as vocal next job? Someone at Meta saying it sucks publicly and that they no longer want to be ther
94.
▲
by
jmye
5mo ago
> The caveat, though? I very much doubt Google has the capacity to execute this properly. I don't think it's a capacity issue, it's that their whole entire business is advertising and acquiring the user data to feed it. I
95.
▲
by
jmye
5mo ago
I think you should post substantively about the actual fucking article, instead of musing about nonsense, but here we are. Call me more names, though, bro. That’ll beat the AI allegations.
96.
▲
by
jmye
5mo ago
No one is going to adopt some new “sql, but it solves a dumb problem you’ve already solved!” variant to solve a dumb problem they’ve already solved, no matter how many beginners seem to be writing accounting software with no knowledge of al
97.
▲
by
jmye
5mo ago
> deranged [...] that borders on a personal attack. He says, unironically. > This behavior does not lead to clever or constructive conversation. He says, unironically. Physician, heal thyself.
98.
▲
by
jmye
5mo ago
I read some of it as interesting "quick fails" - Apple's BNPL, for instance - I see why they would have tried, and it's interesting that they pivoted relatively quickly out of it. Some of the text is silly sour grapes, b
99.
▲
by
jmye
5mo ago
> someone who is motivated to help with open-source software. I don’t mean to pile on, but like… are you actually helping if you don’t understand the code you’re fixing, don’t understand the problem you’re addressing, and don’t understan
100.
▲
by
jmye
5mo ago
Do you think data centers and the average satellite generate an equivalent amount of heat?
101.
▲
by
jmye
5mo ago
Weird comment on an article where that literally isn’t the case. I can’t tell if it’s just bot-driven nonsense, not reading the text, or just dishonesty masquerading as commentary.
102.
▲
by
jmye
5mo ago
> not wield them as retributive tools against our opponents No, we should apply them equally to Mark Fucking Zuckerberg (which is decidedly not retributive, however much you want to make an emotional appeal) until such time as they are
103.
▲
by
jmye
5mo ago
I genuinely care about my friend. He's really into bee-keeping. I don't care at all about bees. But he cares about it, so I ask questions because I care about him . I have now learned enough about his bee-keeping to be legitima
104.
▲
by
jmye
5mo ago
Giving someone, as in this thread, a genuine compliment that you mean sincerely isn't "flowery small talk" and it's sort of depressing that you think that it is. No one in this thread is talking about your example except
105.
▲
by
jmye
5mo ago
So tired of this "reacting to a dude who built a CSAM generator is the real cringe" horseshit from people who know exactly what they're covering for.
106.
▲
by
jmye
5mo ago
I think it's the excitement because it's a morally bankrupt organization. Some people really get off on knowing that the sum total of everything they do professionally is bent around making kids depressed to the point of suicide
107.
▲
by
jmye
5mo ago
And then people are shocked that no one wants the data centers for this shit built in their backyard.
108.
▲
by
jmye
6mo ago
> is because DEI is fundamentally a discriminatory movement that resulted in systemic racism and sexism at many companies, universities, and governments Utter horseshit. “DEI” is just the latest boogeyman (it was CRT last election cycle
109.
▲
by
jmye
6mo ago
Are there start-ups led by idiots suggesting that smacking yourself in the head with a hammer will help treat your diabetes? If not, then perhaps there's a problem in your analogy.
110.
▲
by
jmye
6mo ago
You can make a confident statement and assume your readers are smart enough to understand it as "this may not be true in all situations always" but then they may be so desperate to insert stupid memes into their responses that the
111.
▲
by
jmye
6mo ago
> We would not abide by the electric company dictating a range of things, even of you have the option to run your own generator. An absurdly dishonest comparison. Which you (hopefully) knew when you made it.
112.
▲
by
jmye
6mo ago
> This argument falls apart since there is no real freedom of choice Absolute, unmitigated bullshit. You are not forced to buy an iPhone by anyone, ever. > “it’s a corporation they can do whatever they want” Then perhaps you should ma
113.
▲
by
jmye
6mo ago
I mean, god forbid the guy start with one platform, right? Calling that "normalization" is just victimy, whining-about-blue-bubble bullshit.
114.
▲
by
jmye
6mo ago
Is this a serious comment? > why not just let him do it and stop complaining? Because I have to live on this planet for a few more decades. I feel like I'm being trolled?
115.
▲
by
jmye
6mo ago
It's just weird to see it here, honestly. I wouldn't have expected the ROI on this board to be worth it. It just feels, whatever the admins think, more like reddit with this crap.
116.
▲
by
jmye
6mo ago
> To billions of exploited sweatshop workers the average American is not much better than the billionaires. Nor are the Europeans or East Asians. > In my career I have had endless obligations and expectations put on me by peers not ou
117.
▲
by
jmye
6mo ago
It's not odd, given the rest of his comment ("they’re like the most blessed org"), it's just plain and simple dishonesty from someone who thinks a top-level comment casting doubt is better for the agitprop than a million
118.
▲
by
jmye
6mo ago
What, specifically, does banning buying cigarettes have to do with “censorship”? Or are we just saying words now, because they seem emotive?
119.
▲
by
jmye
6mo ago
“Hacking is letting Zuck or Musk or Nadella build shit in your backyard actually” is a fucking lame argument to make, and it’s only worse because of the misuse of the tween-on-Reddit “bootlicking” meme.
120.
▲
by
jmye
6mo ago
Equating this shit with a NIMBY argument is unequivocally dishonest. I don’t want any more shitty AI data centers anywhere . Sorry that that negatively impacts your totally awesome start-up.
More ›