Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jmye
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
22 ms
·
601.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
> The problem here is that the notion that "DEI is just a loose label for having less discrimination in the workforce" is always hidden behind by people who want to use it for more forceful discrimination. Nah. The problem is d
602.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
If I spend a lot of campaign time suggesting I’m the fiscally responsible one and you’re not, I don’t think “neither were you!” Is a meaningful response when you note my irresponsibility. At some point I should be answerable for not represe
603.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
I quoted the specific words GP used and the specific post GP made. I’m not clear how asking GP to elaborate on what was apparently a statement not made in good faith is “changing the topic”. Aside from the fact that it apparently makes id
604.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
What is 1%? 1% of poor folk’s income? Or is it just 1% of the budget, making it a wildly silly place to start “cost savings” on behalf of “poor people”?
605.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
Why didn’t you answer the question?
606.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
How much money, specifically, do you think is “taken” from the “poorest” and “given away” by USAID? This is a weird line of attack on basically anything in the federal government’s budget, as is the suggestion that it works similarly to you
607.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
I’m “under the impression” that he’s obviously never had a specific, unelected role in government used to steal government information and informally fire government workers. In spite of the absurd notion that donating to candidates is rem
608.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
What a completely weird question. I don’t understand why you’d invoke a right-wing conspiracy trope that’s obviously and incontrovertibly incompatible with the current reality. Was it accidental, like it’s just a knee jerk reaction to screa
609.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
In reality? They don’t. In the current despotic US? Musk has been empowered by the President and the courts to do anything he wants, however he wants. He is, effectively, one of the two most powerful people in the US government.
610.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
> Yeah, the fact that she can barely speak full sentences surely had nothing to do with it. This is a bald lie, and is wildly unbecoming of discussion on this site. But it’s also a hilarious assertion in the face of literally anything Tr
611.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
While Republicans cheer.
612.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
> We pretended Facebook was acceptable for democracy even after the fallout of Cambridge Analytica. Pulling one example, but it applies to all of them in different ways: “We” decided the stock price and “our” equity was more important th
613.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
Extreme cowardice and sociopathy, combined with seeing the ability to take advantage of the kleptocracy that around 130m Americans decided they wanted.
614.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
Would love this, in light of recent decision-making at the bigger companies. I refuse to use Google products when it’s at all possible to avoid them, and would prefer to move away from Apple (for similar but different reasons). That said, i
615.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
> when you and your peers have similar experience and backgrounds. Then you’ve done a shitty job building your network. No wonder you don’t see any value. I got laid off a bit ago - after announcing I was looking, I had several C-level f
616.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
You’d be surprised by how many people don’t think that through. There are always a surprising number of people apparently just going through the motions.
617.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
I don’t understand what you mean. That you can certainly opt in to artificial nonsense, as wholeheartedly and completely as you want, doesn’t mean society is artificial. It just means that’s the part you’ve decided to live your life in.
618.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
Ah, so by “not voting” you meant “leaving one box blank while already filling out the rest of the ballot because what’s the point of wasting the ink”? Sorry, that reads, to me, like post hoc justification for nonsense. The only people who t
619.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
… Do you think President is the only thing on the ballot? Do you think that maybe, if everyone voted, the demographics might be different? I’m so tired of this nonsense. If y’all bothered showing up for state and local races, you could even
620.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
I think this is the mistake being made - he has no beliefs. He’s purely and completely a sociopath. Nothing matters but money and whatever power he has at Facebook.
621.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
Those people don’t have those jobs because of their degree. As a non-wealthy, not particularly bright creative writing major, the focus of your degree only holds you back if you let it, or if you are utterly unwilling to work outside of you
622.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
> Vs if she's happy her mood might change on a whim due to period or other things What a weird point of view. I assume that asking your SO if they’re upset because she’s on her period, you might start to have a good idea of why your
623.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
The government can do (literally) whatever a majority of voters are willing to encourage and/or accept. In this case, this is precisely what Trump voters wanted, and what every non-voter said they were ok with.
624.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
Yep - I love ChatGPT for “conversation starter” analysis and ideas. I think it works well to help me figure out what my question is (a program isn’t working and the error message is generic), or to refine something I’ve written or test me
625.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
What fault do you think GP was finding? Do you think GP is wrong and that the President is, in fact, deeply invested in this? And if so, why not say it instead of complain weirdly about persecution?
626.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
And Russia is transparently lying. “But you call everyone a Nazi” isn’t particularly persuasive - it’s just Republican agitprop.
627.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
Yup. Anyone who still maintains an account on any Meta product (including WhatsApp) is giving this shit their full-throated support in the only way Zuck cares about. And that says nothing about the kinds of horrible people still working t
628.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
Surely they’ll have their pick of the 4chan litter.
629.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
“Intentionally trying to destabilize the country and trying to sell you things are literally identical issues.”
630.
▲
by
jmye
2y ago
Can you point to a single time that banning the speech of Nazis has led down a vast slippery slope of further speech bans, particularly in a vaguely democratic country?
More ›