jmnicholson

33 ms·

331.
The rising trend in authorship in scientific articles(thewinnower.com)
3 points by jmnicholson 12y ago|0 comments
332.
Show HN: Online DIY scientific publishing(thewinnower.com)
2 points by jmnicholson 12y ago|0 comments
333.
The Medium of Scientific Publishing(medium.com)
2 points by jmnicholson 12y ago|0 comments
334.
Did Charles Darwin Go To A R1 Institution?(thewinnower.com)
3 points by jmnicholson 12y ago|2 comments
335.
Weirdest book title ever? "Nazis, Women and Molecular Biology"(amazon.com)
2 points by jmnicholson 12y ago|0 comments
336.
How weird is it to thank science journals to "reprint" your own work?(thewinnower.com)
1 points by jmnicholson 12y ago|0 comments
337.
Ask HN: Is it always a good thing to be a "serial entreprenuer"
5 points by jmnicholson 12y ago|1 comments
338.
by jmnicholson 12y ago
How much should we charge?
339.
Ask HN: DOIs for scientific Blogs?
1 points by jmnicholson 12y ago|1 comments
340.
Should we look at cute cats when coding? Research says yes(thewinnower.com)
1 points by jmnicholson 12y ago|0 comments
341.
The R-Factor: A Measure of Scientific Veracity(thewinnower.com)
1 points by jmnicholson 12y ago|0 comments
342.
Research on Climate Consensus Provokes Strong Reactions(thewinnower.com)
1 points by jmnicholson 12y ago|0 comments
343.
by jmnicholson 12y ago
Short answer: No "To our delight, almost none of the reviewers and editors recognized the manuscripts as ones recently published by their journals."
344.
Would editors fail to recognize already-published articles in their own journal?(thewinnower.com)
3 points by jmnicholson 12y ago|1 comments
345.
How We Identified a Relationship Between Cell Phone Use, Academic Performance...(thewinnower.com)
1 points by jmnicholson 12y ago|0 comments
346.
Do dogs defecate based on magnetic fields?(thewinnower.com)
2 points by jmnicholson 12y ago|0 comments
347.
One of the largest frauds in science tells his side of the story(thewinnower.com)
2 points by jmnicholson 12y ago|0 comments
348.
by jmnicholson 12y ago
This is precisely one of the reasons The Winnower (where it was published) was founded. Peer review is becoming increasingly shown to be faulty at identifying mistakes. It is better at holding back controversial or unorthodox ideas, which
349.
by jmnicholson 12y ago
You should sign up and review the paper itself! https://thewinnower.com/papers/searching-the-internet-for-ev...
350.
by jmnicholson 12y ago
The piece is more about the publishing process and less about time travel. See a direct quote from the author: "First of all, the topic itself is a controversial one, as made clear immediately by the work's title "Searching
351.
by jmnicholson 12y ago
It has already been published in The Winnower: https://thewinnower.com/papers/searching-the-internet-for-ev...
352.
The Treason of The Editors – How Scientific Journal Editors Changed Sides (thewinnower.com)
1 points by jmnicholson 12y ago|0 comments
353.
What Happened When We Tried to Publish a Real Paper Investigating Time Travel(thewinnower.com)
335 points by jmnicholson 12y ago|181 comments
354.
Making Scientific Blogs Count aka Academic Blogging(thewinnower.com)
1 points by jmnicholson 12y ago|0 comments
355.
Did Charles Darwin go to a R1 institution?(thewinnower.com)
2 points by jmnicholson 13y ago|0 comments
356.
What is a pre-print anyways(thewinnower.com)
1 points by jmnicholson 13y ago|0 comments