jmalicki

20 ms·

451.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
Your capital costs for buying those machines don't go away.
452.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
> Are you're saying that you'd want the commits for `feature_0` through `feature_1` to be in the PR (to the upstream fancyproject repo), and you'd want it to exclude the commits in the range from the fork commit through to
453.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
Yes, they chose the knob of ToS, because that was the way to price it correctly.
454.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
You aren't paying to be using that limit all of the time. You are paying to be using that limit some of the time. There are 5 hour windows when you are sleeping and can't use it. There are weekend limits. Theoretically you can m
455.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
You can manually stack PRs by making the merge target another branch. The workflow just makes it a pain, since you have to manually rebase in both the branch and the UI after the original PR merges.
456.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
It's relevant in that it's an example that people are doing the easy part - the coding - and skipping the hard part - the benchmarking and proving it works and provides value. A PR without evidence it works and expectations for th
457.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
It is sarcasm. I always get screwed by Poe's law, since dry sarcastic parodies of extremist views is one of my favorite methodologies for producing humor.
458.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
The government should outsource way more of their traffic to third parties than a business should, since the government is inefficient, right?
459.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
My first was in college on the lab computers, I was like "can I create a pthreads bomb instead to circumvent the fork bomb protections?" Luckily the head sysadmin knew me and was in the room at the time, and I sheepishly explained
460.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
Is the CEO responsible for a company's financial performance? Do they review every line of code the company writes? It is more irresponsible to spend the time reviewing all of the code rather than spending that time on things with big
461.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
When a startup raises money without contingencies, typically they do get a large amount of money in the bank all at once.
462.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
What I am saying is that if you do meet the milestones from your previous round, you're going to have an easy time fundraising anyway, so funding contingent on milestones isn't that different than just saying "well, if we nee
463.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
It just makes comparing funding rounds hard to understand, since money in the bank is money in the bank, and a lot of the "committed capital if you reach a milestone" is capital that would be easy to get if you reached that milest
464.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
But you have limited funds to take in a lawsuit realistically the worst they can do is fire you, it's not like being blameable somehow makes you more valuable.
465.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
Cool! It's also nice that Sutton & Barto belabors a lot of old stuff that is no longer obsessed over, and this skims through that and gets to the stuff that is much more relevant today.
466.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
I did. If you have an older tool chain, it is on you to fix the library to build with the older tool chain, that's what open source is about!
467.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
I have seen cables for powered computer speakers make cat5, or coat hangers, look amazing
468.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
Sure, but if you start a new small project and throw it on GitHub, it's not totally insane to just put the version you tested. Just because someone put up their tiny library doesn't mean they've put in the effort to figure o
469.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
> Where are you seeing people being told that AI is infallible? AI is being hyped to the moon, but "infallible" is not one of the claims. I see all kinds of people being told that AI-based AI detection software used for detecti
470.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
That assert could completely fail to fire if inlined into another function that did a dereference first.
471.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
I have seen shielding and gauge make quite a difference for cables carrying analog signals!
472.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
The funny thing is this study only looked at non-EMT ambulance drivers - i.e. those true ambulance drivers!
473.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
I just need to make a cable with better eye diagrams so I can market it to AV enthusiasts with "golden eyes"!
474.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
His link made very clear the issues of jitter and flickering.
475.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
So you're saying there is something to audiophile grade HDMI cables?
476.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
That's the weird best thing about LLMs - there is finally incentive for projects to create documentation, CLIs, tests, and well organized modular codebases, since LLMs fall flat on their face without these things!
477.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
If your hook prevents rm, it is possible for Claude to write a script that does the rm and execute the script.
478.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
It's still possible to give some restricted access to your personal data, through groups and such.
479.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
A lot of compilers will optimize out a NULL pointer check because dereferencing a NULL pointer is UB. Because assert will not run the following code in the case of a NULL pointer, AFAIK this exact code is still defined behavior, but if fo
480.
by jmalicki 7mo ago
Anyone with an older toolchain is free to fork it on github, test with the older version, and CI to the project that tests with the older version, and submit a patch, too! This may not get the project as many users, but not everyone who wri

More ›