jlgaddis

22 ms·

151.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
> ... a sudo-like command to run elevated from an otherwise non-elevated shell. Something like RunAs? [0] -- [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runas
152.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
> ... native MS tools ... I recall that the developer of AppGet claiming [0] that Microsoft effectively "stole" AppGet from him. [0]: https://medium.com/@keivan/the-day-appget-died-e9a5c96c8b22
153.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
> No on expects a mailserver cert to be from an authority, you can self sign and it works fine. Yes, but that's A Bad Thing(TM) -- it means that MITM'ing a mail server also "works fine"! Now, personally, I'm no
154.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
> Using .local conflicts with mdns It's completely acceptable to use .local. in such a manner, however. The "conflict resolution" process is outlined in the RFC [0] and is, well, pretty simple: > ... the computer (or
155.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
> Ideally there would be one or two private tlds codified just as there are private ip ranges ... There are several, in fact. RFC8375 [0] states: > This document registers the domain 'home.arpa.' as a special-use domain n
156.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
That wouldn't quite work the way you think it would... The CAA record is useful only at the time a certificate is issued (signed) by a CA. A client has no way to know what the CAA record was at the time the certificate was issued
157.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
I haven't checked/verified recently but from your comment I'm guessing that the major browsers still don't support (i.e., enforce) the Name Constraints extension?
158.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
As noizejoy pointed out [0]: > That site’s history with HN [1] isn’t exactly confidence inspiring. Unfortunately, guardicore.com's "reputation" [2] isn't much better! Of all the articles on this topic linked in this
159.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
> Are people still using Apache web server in 2020? Yes. In fact, about one-fourth of the "top million busiest sites", 24.6%, are "still using Apache in [December] 2020" [0] -- more than any other web server. More &qu
160.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
X.509 certificates issued by your private PKI would do the trick. You'd have to implement a registration / enrollment process during which you'd handle the setup but that'd be a one-time thing (plus a "renewal"
161.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
I came to the conclusion a looooong ago that mobile phones cause either 1) very, very little or 2) absolutely no problems whatsoever to an aircraft. (If they did , you wouldn't be allowed anywhere near an airplane -- let alone inside
162.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
I appreciate your in-depth response as well as the replies from the others as well. Before asking. I did spend perhaps 15-20 minutes exploring the web site and Git repo. I found the "how?" and "why?" but I was having tro
163.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
> Is anyone aware of any (FOSS) software (presumably intrusion detectors or indicators of compromise) for mobile phones that might help flag or even prevent such attacks? Assuming such applications existed, how would you install them o
164.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
I've wondered that before as well. If one were sufficiently motivated and planned ahead, you could almost consider it as a future "insurance policy" of sorts.
165.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
I wish. Until that becomes common (or even possible ), the best alternative we have available is to make sure that the companies and legal teams do not succeed in their ultimate goal. That objective, of course, is to create a "chillin
166.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
> It's beyond suspicious that 4 newly created users all have positive experience with PJON and only posted on this submission. I will freely admit that I am, quite often, overly suspicious when there's a bunch of "green&
167.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
Giovanni, Can you highlight some "real world" use cases where PJON is/was used? I'm curious what folks have used PJON for, especially over RF (excluding Wi-Fi), such as the "video camera control" project in ano
168.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
So, since some will choose to continue to break the law, we should just give up, do away with the laws, and make it a free for all? That makes absolutely no sense at all.
169.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
No kidding, right!? I mean, if you think about it, all that's really needed is for a "s/CentOS/Rocky/g" over all of the repositories. Then, the other 99% of the project is just waiting for the packages to rebui
170.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
Meh, this "whitepaper" is just thinly-veiled spam. I'll sum it up for you: > "IP over HF is really inefficient and should be avoided whenever possible." > "You wanna know what's SUPER-DUPER EFFICI
171.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
I'm not certain I grok all of that correctly, but the last bit sounds kinda like DMVPN [0]. -- [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Multipoint_Virtual_Pri...
172.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
> ... but they claim it meets "most" of the OSI criteria. As Frank Robinson [0] once said: > "[...] Close only counts in horseshoes [1] and hand grenades." -- [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki&
173.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
> NOTE: Systemd has a nasty habit of delaying logins for 25 - 100 seconds while it waits for some service you never asked for to time out and fail, before it lets you have a prompt. If you experience this when logging in to a host via
174.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
There's a few ways to try to "workaround" this issue, typically involving multiple "Host" entries in ~/.ssh/config. I haven't actually tried it yet myself, but I think my preference would be to set th
175.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
If you'd like to, you can shoot yourself in the head repeatedly with a nailgun. Don't expect any sympathy from me afterwards, however, when you're whining about how bad your head hurts. What you describe is a problem the orga
176.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
> If you happen to notice the error that is... like the OP pointed out, almost all bash shell script ignore silently errors and figuring which of the hundred of lines fails on your particular setup is a fun exercise. > And then...
177.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
I'd be disappointed if I launched an instance and discovered that /bin/csh [0] (or at least tcsh) wasn't the default! -- [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_shell
178.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
Actual headline: > Twitter Will Use Amazon Web Services to Power User Feeds As the article makes clear, they aren't switching everything to AWS, as the editorialized title implies. I flagged it for just that reason -- as many wi
179.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
Did you miss the "Additional Details" section? > Many of our internal users and tools experienced similar errors, which added delays to our outage external communication. Also: > We will publish an analysis of this incide
180.
by jlgaddis 6y ago
It seems you missed an opportunity (BTW, is that what they call "content marketing"?). Had you left your VM running a little while longer, you might've noticed something else in your Netflow data: yet another service calling

More ›