jkush

37 ms·

361.
by jkush 19y ago
362.
Motivation and Strategies For Entrepreneurs(evancarmichael.com)
1 points by jkush 19y ago|0 comments
363.
Entrepreneur Evolution(entrepreneurevolution.com)
1 points by jkush 19y ago|0 comments
364.
What The Shawshank Redemption Can Teach You About Entrepreneurship(businesspundit.com)
2 points by jkush 19y ago|0 comments
365.
Just Say No To Google: Internal Microsoft Email(no2google.wordpress.com)
47 points by jkush 19y ago|13 comments
366.
by jkush 19y ago
I would consider charging a small fee per minute (to the person calling you). [edit] I absolutely love this idea! I love to see this kind of thing, too.
367.
by jkush 19y ago
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000882.html Apologies for submitting a top-level domain...
368.
Designing for Informavores, or, Why Users Behave Like Animals Online(codinghorror.com)
2 points by jkush 19y ago|1 comments
369.
by jkush 19y ago
I'm posting a link to my own blog because I wrote the post intending it to be tongue in cheek. Much to my surprise (and amusement) over 50 people have bookmarked it on Del.icio.us.
370.
10 ways to procrastinate and still be productive(themicrobusinessexperiment.blogspot.com)
1 points by jkush 19y ago|1 comments
371.
Removing the Login Barrier(codinghorror.com)
13 points by jkush 19y ago|2 comments
372.
by jkush 19y ago
Thanks for posting this. I have to keep reminding myself that a "web 2.0" site isn't the only kind of viable web site. There are lots of sites that have lots of visitors that are still firmly rooted in web 1.0 style.
373.
Scalability and Performance are the Least of your Worries(expatsoftware.com)
9 points by jkush 19y ago|0 comments
374.
MVC In Web Forms(ayende.com)
1 points by jkush 19y ago|0 comments
375.
by jkush 19y ago
I did vote this post up. Which is why you have 2 points on it. :)
376.
by jkush 19y ago
I think your suggestion is good. My idea IS a form of grief counseling in that the site will facilitate the act of remembering by friends and families.
377.
by jkush 19y ago
So maybe my startup idea isn't so far off? http://news.ycombinator.com/comments?id=15030
378.
Interview with Eric Goldstein of Clipmarks(startupstories.com)
2 points by jkush 19y ago|0 comments
379.
How To Get Rich Programming(codinghorror.com)
3 points by jkush 19y ago|0 comments
380.
by jkush 19y ago
See here: http://paulgraham.com/ideas.html He did write "The fact that there's no market for startup ideas suggests there's no demand. Which means, in the narrow sense of the word, that startup ideas are worthless." What I mean when I say
381.
by jkush 19y ago
No, but what's important is that the idea was physically incarnated in the form of writing. The act of writing is what counts.
382.
by jkush 19y ago
Look Juwo, you're still playing with words. It's not so much that an idea is WORTHLESS (where it doesn't have any value) as it's that an idea doesn't really count for anything UNTIL it's been brought out into the real world. For all intents
383.
Google announces purge of ad-heavy sites(nypost.com)
2 points by jkush 19y ago|0 comments
384.
by jkush 19y ago
That's because you're playing with semantics. Ideas are worthless because an idea can't solve a problem. It's the implementation of an idea that solves the problem.
385.
by jkush 19y ago
Even with a very high ASVAB score, being very color blind and a high school dropout to boot kept me from doing anything of interest in the Navy. I quite literally spent my entire stint painting, sweeping and tying knots.
386.
by jkush 19y ago
I have to admit that being a Navy vet, I'm doubtful about any technique developed by the military. That said, this looks like a simple way to get a handle on what to work on first.
387.
How to Prioritize Using a Military Technique(stevepavlina.com)
2 points by jkush 19y ago|6 comments
388.
by jkush 19y ago
Hey, great link! Thanks.
389.
by jkush 19y ago
Sorry about that!
390.
by jkush 19y ago
From the blog post: "JavaScript's C-like syntax, including curly braces and the clunky for statement, makes it appear to be an ordinary procedural language. This is misleading because JavaScript has more in common with functional languages

More ›