jkartchner

6 ms·

31.
by jkartchner 8y ago
You can't "remove" your state criminal case to federal court. You've confused a civil case with a criminal case brought by the state.
32.
by jkartchner 8y ago
Yes. It was all rhetorical.
33.
by jkartchner 8y ago
That's not how the courts often see it, though I admit it's been awhile since I've reviewed the caselaw
34.
by jkartchner 8y ago
We don't see defeats because they don't have the money for a voice that will carry. They happen every day. Those people just have to deal with being wronged, quietly. This is how imperfect people become true criminals.
35.
by jkartchner 8y ago
Is access to the US "life, liberty, or property?" Does the Constitution apply to those outside "the land"? Often not.
36.
by jkartchner 8y ago
It's not about taxes at all. The government has no financial limits, particularly where political damage could be done. A defendant, unless exceptionally wealthy, does. Dr. Ibrahim had to put up almost $4 million just to get back to sq
37.
by jkartchner 8y ago
I think the idea is to use the clickable browser option on a trusted machine, e.g., at home. If you're using some other system you can log in by scanning the QR code with your phone without having to use a keyboard, avoiding keyboard l
38.
by jkartchner 8y ago
I think the idea is you have a phone that asks less of you and can't do more than a few things. You can't email, view video. But the battery could last for weeks. The simply can't grow into that much of a distraction.
39.
by jkartchner 8y ago
Not sure if it qualifies as a dumbphone, but I'm eyeing the Lightphone. It's definitely more expensive than the old bricks, but way cheaper than the usual smartphone. https://www.thelightphone.com/home/