jjulius

73 ms·

631.
by jjulius 2y ago
>The fact you would say such a thing tells me you are either ignorant of what was revealed, or you agree with censorship of people you don't like. Or it says that I read them and found them boring, hardly representative of the censo
632.
by jjulius 2y ago
>Social media was censored largely (though not entirely) by Democrats as exposed by Matt Taibbi. This isn't any conspiracy theory, it's documented fact. You mean the "smoking gun" that turned out to be a wet blanket o
633.
by jjulius 2y ago
This perspective is willfully ignorant towards social issues.
634.
by jjulius 2y ago
And I rarely see such a rush to judge someone so harshly over something so relatively innocuous. Setting aside the fact that it's OK for someone to be wrong and for us to correct them in a constructive manner, I'm not even sure
635.
by jjulius 2y ago
>It's not a distraction. It absolutely is. It asks people to engage in a frivolous debate about semantics when, in reality, the issue is much larger and far more complex, with more intrinsically important and impactful aspects to it
636.
by jjulius 2y ago
>Is the AR-19 an assault rifle too? If this is something that you're genuinely asking me for my opinion on, then I'd ask you to re-read my comment, because you've missed my point entirely.
637.
by jjulius 2y ago
Can you really blame people for all of the confusion around whether or not an "AR-something" is 'technically' an "assault rifle"? I mean, if you go to the Wiki article that you cited, the piece you quoted links
638.
by jjulius 2y ago
... what? They do have a problem with single-use electronics/batteries, so much so that they're banning them.
639.
by jjulius 2y ago
Genuinely curious, since I've never heard of the app until this very moment - do you actually find that you save a noticeable amount on gas? I tend to notice that prices are incredibly similar from station to station in whatever gene
640.
by jjulius 2y ago
At this point I think it's safe to ask - what happened between you and a dog/dogs at some point in your life to prompt you to take this stance?
641.
by jjulius 2y ago
See: Designated wilderness areas. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wilderness_areas_of_th...
642.
US probes Tesla's Full Self-Driving software after fatal crash(reuters.com)
417 points by jjulius 2y ago|977 comments
643.
by jjulius 2y ago
>... [I] believe he will end up being in the right on this >My opinion is both parties are in the wrong... So you feel which way, now?
644.
by jjulius 2y ago
This take feels like something I'd expect to hear come out of the mouth of a teenager (read: a child) who's trying too hard to sound edgy.
645.
by jjulius 2y ago
Nah, the whole thing with Musk fanboys getting all up in arms about, "iT's NoT aCkShuAlLy a 'ReCaLl'" thing is dumb and glosses over the overall point. If a vehicle has a safety issue that needs to be fixed, regardl
646.
by jjulius 2y ago
That's a pretty generous way to describe a ~20-acre geofenced, low-speed ride using a pre-mapped area in which they likely tested this out quite a bit prior to the event.
647.
by jjulius 2y ago
Creature comforts, fine, they can go, but a shorter range? I thought the idea was for me to be able to have my car galavanting around the city all day being a taxi for people to help me make money. Forgive my ignorance, but how is a shorter
648.
by jjulius 2y ago
I mean, people have been gullible for this long already...
649.
by jjulius 2y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41804340
650.
by jjulius 2y ago
I mean, there's a difference between writing an exemption just so you can do a thing without getting in trouble, and writing an exemption that is so obviously for the benefit and health of society/community writ large. I can&#x2
651.
by jjulius 2y ago
The post you're responding to says that they shouldn't break the law. Emergency vehicles are allowed, by written law , to exceed the speed limit and move through red lights. Here's one, for instance... https://ore
652.
by jjulius 2y ago
If anybody is as confused as I was, the quote in this comment is from a separate article from weeks back... https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/o...
653.
by jjulius 2y ago
>Which is why I said it reads like copium to me. Fixed that for you. It reads like an open mind, or at the very least an attempt at one, to me. Keep on keeping on, OP.
654.
by jjulius 2y ago
I'd also ask a similar question about the stark increase in suicide rates, not just mental health.
655.
by jjulius 2y ago
IMO, there was entirely too much snark in there. It felt like the goal they set out on was to dunk on Haidt, rather to act as impartially as possible.
656.
by jjulius 2y ago
>13 hours of work... ... what?
657.
by jjulius 2y ago
This is the complete opposite of my lived experience. I've yet to talk to a neighbor and have it result in a more annoying experience, and my kids are great at talking things through with us without ignoring us. Not every experience
658.
by jjulius 2y ago
>There are literally massive, paradigm-changing projects in both spaces right now , with real users and communities. And in your opinion, these are...?
659.
by jjulius 2y ago
On the one hand, we've got, "Pirating something because we find copyright law to be restrictive and/or corporate pricing to be excessive". On the other, we've got, "Massively wealthy people vacuuming up our cre
660.
by jjulius 2y ago
Not only is this baseless cynicism as another comment said (and, hey, I'm one hell of a cynic), but it also makes wild assumptions, based on absolutely nothing, about how the father would've handled the situation had he won. Tha

More ›