jjuhl

40 ms·

391.
Upcoming features in GCC 6(developerblog.redhat.com)
2 points by jjuhl 11y ago|0 comments
392.
Compiler improvements in VS 2015 Update 2(blogs.msdn.microsoft.com)
2 points by jjuhl 11y ago|0 comments
393.
by jjuhl 11y ago
You should check out clang-tidy: http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/ clang-format: http://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormat.html C++ Core Guidelines: https://github.com/isoc
394.
by jjuhl 11y ago
All I wish for is that more beginners would read (all of) "How To Ask Questions The Smart Way" http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html before asking. That would help a lot I believe.
395.
How similar are GCC and LLVM: The user perspective(embecosm.com)
1 points by jjuhl 11y ago|0 comments
396.
by jjuhl 11y ago
Who cares?
397.
by jjuhl 11y ago
Previous discussion here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5122299
398.
by jjuhl 11y ago
[Quote]Should I start with C++14 and skipped anything before that?[/quote] Yes! C++14 is a much better language than C++98 and you can be perfectly happy without most of the ugly details. Stick to the new nice ways of doing things and
399.
by jjuhl 11y ago
You could have just looked at the traffic directly with wireshark rather than trust an external site.
400.
by jjuhl 11y ago
I think you'll enjoy this talk: CppCon 2015: Atila Neves "Emacs as a C++ IDE" - https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5FQwQ0QWBTU
401.
Linux Kernel ROP – Ropping Your Way to # (Part 1)(cyseclabs.com)
3 points by jjuhl 11y ago|0 comments
402.
Linux Foundation Issues Statement Concerning Community Directors(phoronix.com)
4 points by jjuhl 11y ago|0 comments
403.
Steam on Linux Hits 1800 Games Available(phoronix.com)
7 points by jjuhl 11y ago|1 comments
404.
Which Clang Warning Is Generating This Message?(fuckingclangwarnings.com)
2 points by jjuhl 11y ago|0 comments
405.
by jjuhl 11y ago
To me this reads as "I can't use hardware xyz on linux". Well, that's no surprise. There's "wxy" hardware that you can't use with Windows or OS X as well. Today Linux supports the same amount (or more
406.
by jjuhl 11y ago
You could try to hide it in several ways: 1) just don't say anything and hope nobody notices. 2) fix the underlying problem and then regenerate all keys and post some nonsense saying they had to do so for some "not their fault bul
407.
by jjuhl 11y ago
At least they are aware of the issue and warning their customers. A lot of companies would just fix the issue (or not even that) and try to silently sweep it under the rug.
408.
by jjuhl 11y ago
True. But the day I find myself in a company where that's the case. I'll quit. There has to be room for personal inspiration and activities and management has to know that they are not always right and acknowledge when personal in
409.
by jjuhl 11y ago
I find this to be a really good reality check for new game programmers. It's a really simple game to make but most new people are still surprised at how complex it is to actually do.
410.
But Can You Make Pong? (2003)(tinodidriksen.com)
12 points by jjuhl 11y ago|3 comments
411.
by jjuhl 11y ago
You can't assume the object is not modified by a const member function if the class has mutable members.
412.
by jjuhl 11y ago
Did you read the link? It's all explained there.
413.
by jjuhl 11y ago
Very cool. I remember playing this when it first showed up. Glad it's still alive :)
414.
by jjuhl 11y ago
Here's one use of union in a C++ code base (sf::Event): http://www.sfml-dev.org/documentation/2.3.2/classsf_1_1Event...
415.
rand() Considered Harmful – A Talk by Stephan T. Lavavej(channel9.msdn.com)
2 points by jjuhl 11y ago|0 comments
416.
by jjuhl 11y ago
Right. There are lots of corner cases that would need to be identified and considered in the case of a "strong const" C++ variant (like what you point out) - I still think it could be an interresting experiment.
417.
by jjuhl 11y ago
Yeah. const_cast (and C-style casts) and mutable existing in the language make const pretty useless to the optimizer. But at least they are trying to get some benefit from it in some cases. A C++ variant (compiler flag) that would remove co
418.
by jjuhl 11y ago
Well, they are actually trying to extract some meaning from it for optimization purposes, so I wouldn't call it 'ignored'. 'inline' would be a better example of another "ignored" keyword.
419.
Optimizing C++ Const Objects in LLVM(docs.google.com)
57 points by jjuhl 11y ago|28 comments
420.
Understanding Compiler Optimization – Chandler Carruth, Keynote Meeting C++ 2015(m.youtube.com)
2 points by jjuhl 11y ago|0 comments

More ›