Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jjoe
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
94 ms
·
421.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
There's cookie-based caching in Varnish (and in some other proxy caches too). Essentially, the key is going to be made of the usual hash + the cookie like this: sub vcl_hash { set req.hash += req.http.cookie; } What this means is that t
422.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
It really depends on what app you're running. Let's look at this from the point of view of the user of your app. Your user sees a 2Mbps (assuming you meant Mbps not MB/s) connection. That's a very narrow band for a Web server. Typically, We
423.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
FileVo is another victim. They were shutdown by none other than Softlayer without providing a reason for termination. I do admire your courage. Regards
424.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
I wouldn't trust Softlayer with my clients' data. Look at what happened to SimpleCDN and others. In a matter of a couple of days Softlayer pulled the plug on all their servers. SimpleCDN was erased from the CDN map. They used to have over 1
425.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
"twitter has servers dedicated to high-volume users without having to use urls/dns like that" That's why they need so many load balancers w/ failover: twitter.com has address 128.242.240.148 twitter.com has address 128.242.245.212 twitter.c
426.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
Too many flaws for this idea to take off. I've been in the colo business for years and can certainly tell this is going no where. Here's the killer flaw in the idea: "he.net support and remote hands(I need to check on the details here, but
427.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
DNS is much easier to scale out than HTTP. By having full FQDN for users, you have the capability to easily scale out without needing a load balancer in front of say, threewords.me. So in your DNS zone you can tell it to route all accounts
428.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
It looks like it's already been moved to EC2 and switched to Varnish cache and Nginx for static files. I think the decision to tie the "user" view to the main FQDN ( http://threewords.me/joe ) will come back and bite hard if this project tu
429.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
You gotta love the marketing folks. The blog post has no substance besides the fact that they've hired Edgecast and branded it as their own CDN (ProCDN). Regards Joe
430.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
I'm open & willing to consider this as a possibility. In retrospect, I can think of many situations where I changed course even though I was convinced. But I can also think of many others where I kept pursing things (but not at the risk
431.
▲
Ask HN: Semantically stubborn with borderline fanaticism. But who?
4 points
by
jjoe
16y ago
|
5 comments
432.
▲
Six cool unixy commands (decades old)
(blog.unixy.net)
1 points
by
jjoe
16y ago
|
0 comments
433.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
It's running the Arc web server, which has its own implementation of the HTTP protocol. I don't think there's anything behind or in front of it. Probably not even Memcached. Think of the app serving HN as a framework. Here's how a "URL" ent
434.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
And I thought PG is Jewish! But I must say I didn't notice any Hanukkah color festivities here. Anyway, Merry Christmas all! Regards Joe
435.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
Congrats on the launch! Is there any reason you're running an outdated version of Nginx (0.7.65 vs 0.7.68 vs 0.8.54)? It's one major revision behind current and a few minor behind stable. Which brings me to a question I had lingering in my
436.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
Why is the Vagrant character missing the front of his footwear exposing his toes? Regards Joe
437.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
Benchmark! That's how. Order the least amount of resources and then benchmark your app to see how well it's performing. If your goal is handle 100 req/s, then benchmark with that goal in mind. Your benchmark unit tests need to touch the who
438.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
This is a disgusting action from UK2/SL. If you promise 100TB of data transfer on 1Gbps, you have to keep your word (not matter what). Otherwise, don't venture in offering such deal. Essentially, they're kicking out the tail end of the "dis
439.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
As a person, you do have the freedom to donate to whomever you like but you, alone, have to bear the consequences. But to use your business account to donate money puts you and your clients (and their livelihood) at risk. I don't think it
440.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
Hi there, Keep in mind that writes will always be faster than reads thanks to cache write-back. This is because writes are asynchronous at the kernel and controller level. When your app writes a file, it indirectly writes it to the disk cac
441.
▲
Possible flaw in LOIC - Tool used to DDoS Amazon
(blog.unixy.net)
10 points
by
jjoe
16y ago
|
10 comments
442.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
If I may ask, what are your read and/or write patterns like (random, sequential, predictable, etc)? What's the typical read and/or write size like for your application? How much data are you dealing with? I understand you're set on a cloud-
443.
▲
A Rising Tide Lifts All Boats
(blog.unixy.net)
1 points
by
jjoe
16y ago
|
0 comments
444.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
Check out the anti-DDoS article we wrote up a few months ago. It uses a constellation of Nginx nodes to absorb the DDoS. The constellation acts the same way as a CDN without the geoIP awareness. The advantage of this approach is that instea
445.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
A bogus host will obviously not respond to the RST but the last router-hop that receives the RST will (per RFC/protocol specs). The response is destination unreachable via ICMP. The ICMP unreachable packet is cheap (non-persistent) and requ
446.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
Most likely, the initial Netcraft attempt to connect is met with a RST. Subsequent attempts are also met with the same RST. This is because the attempts are spaced out in time enough for the original ACL, permitting access, to be flushed. A
447.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
It looks like it's hosted in the US (ec2-184-72-37-90.us-west-1.compute.amazonaws.com). Also, the front end proxy is doing some heavy filtering to weed out the cheap hit-and-run nodes participating in the DDoS but still accepts legitimate b
448.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
Novell owns Unix copyrights. Anyone remember SCO vs Novell? Regards
449.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
Hi Riskish, My team and I deal with high traffic portals on a daily basis (as a hosting business). I'll be happy to listen, understand, and share with you ways to scale. Feel free to get in touch. Regards Joe
450.
▲
by
jjoe
16y ago
What's the licensing for this theme? Can one just use the source/theme? Regards
More ›