jjani

12 ms·

151.
by jjani 1y ago
Something not copy-pasted from an LLM would be more acceptable.
152.
by jjani 1y ago
Hey CodeRabbit employees > The researchers identified that Rubocop, one of our tools, was running outside our secure sandbox environment — a configuration that deviated from our standard security protocols. This is still ultra-LLM-speak
153.
by jjani 1y ago
Would love a source on them not paying. They've appealed the latest one rather than refusing to pay [0]. The 500 million one is also for anti-trust rather than GDPR, which is the one that includes % global revenue fines. [0] https:&#x
154.
by jjani 1y ago
I think image/video generation models tend to get released later? And some subscription products?
155.
by jjani 1y ago
That would really require an absolutely dramatic escalation of the fines, as the current ones - even the Meta €1.2 billion fine they got in 2023 - are absolute drops in the ocean compared to even just their yearly EU profit. And the reality
156.
by jjani 1y ago
Because Google never made such profits in China even when they did operate there, neither do they really have the opportunity to do so, even if they'd comply with everything they'd be asked of. Entirely different from their EU ope
157.
by jjani 1y ago
"letter" here wasn't intended to mean "letter of the law", rather "letter of whatever we tell you to do".
158.
by jjani 1y ago
For GDPR they already are, it should indeed be made to be the same for anti-competitiveness laws. https://gdpr.eu/fines/ > The less severe infringements could result in a fine of up to €10 million, or 2% of the firm
159.
by jjani 1y ago
No, that's not the real answer at all, it's anything but. You have no idea just how much revenue Google et. al make from e.g. the EU. The shareholders would absolutely eat Google alive for just walking away from many billions of
160.
by jjani 1y ago
> go to any non-western country. height still matters but personality, integrity and intelligence is enough to get you ahead in the dating market. Any non-western country? Bold statement. I can tell you that there are non-western countri
161.
by jjani 1y ago
They're swapping out hardware, which is why they're asking money for this to compensate the labor costs. Not saying this justifies it, but the title is misleading.
162.
by jjani 1y ago
I really don't get why you'd use an ethnic slur as your HN username. Does it make your secret place all tingly when you imagine those who understand, spot it?
163.
by jjani 1y ago
> This is actually pretty smart on their part. It's the literal concept of a tax haven.
164.
by jjani 1y ago
Late reply, but this isn't really so much about being "lazy", more about unrealistic standards. It's like if all IT fresh grads in Sweden (to name the same random country again) would only want to work at Spotify or DICE
165.
by jjani 1y ago
I've been to Starbucks in Seoul 100+ times (not proud of it, more the opposite) and have never seen anything like this.
166.
by jjani 1y ago
> the current level of exploiting each other doesn't come naturally for people. Agreed, it doesn't. Nothing about that fact seems reason for optimism, however. It's a gigantic leap to go from "the current level of exp
167.
by jjani 1y ago
"Wealthy startup steals EU trademark" still works as most will fill in the blank with US.
168.
by jjani 1y ago
For life? How can you be bound by this? Unless you sold yourself out for an extra month pay.
169.
by jjani 1y ago
That can all be trivially fixed by style of seating and tables, removing all power outlets and so on. People who don't go there to work won't care. I live in the country with probably the highest sit-down cafe density cities in th
170.
by jjani 1y ago
Love how the MCPs mimic the company they represent in that sense.
171.
by jjani 1y ago
https://bsky.app/profile/kjhealy.co/post/3lvtxbtexg226
172.
by jjani 1y ago
> If you remove the people born into privilege, from attending your college, all you succeed is in making your college irrelevant, not those people irrelevant. Calling 99% of the world's universities irrelevant is certainly a take.
173.
by jjani 1y ago
This was nothing but "temporary", it's still in place; the last time we ran the evals is 2 weeks ago and it's the exact same. It can't be a "capacity glitch" either, as it actually outputs those as proper
174.
by jjani 1y ago
That's a very roundabout way to phrase "you're completely making all of this up", which is quite disappointing tbh. Are you familiar with evals? As in automated testing using multiple runs? It's simple regression te
175.
by jjani 1y ago
It doesn't seem clear to me what the result would be, what makes you think it is? It's super unlikely that there's one answer across all use cases for "GPT5 vs Claude" anyway. Double so if you include Opus and the v
176.
by jjani 1y ago
If they're meaningless why'd you post it besides getting views on your blog? > Also regarding "Sonnet is faster" I did explicitly mention that I believe this is because GPT-5 is in preview and hours from the release.
177.
by jjani 1y ago
It appears to be overtuned on extremy strict instruction following, interpreting things in a very unhuman way, which may be a benefit to agentic tasks at the costs of everything else. My limited API testing with gpt-5 also showed this. As
178.
by jjani 1y ago
No, they do change deployed models. How can I be so sure? Evals. There was a point where Sonnet 3.5 v2 happily output 40k+ tokens in one message if asked. And one day it started with 99% consistency, outputting "Would you like me to co
179.
by jjani 1y ago
They're almost never straight upgrades for the exact same prompts across the board at the same latency and price. The last time that happened was already a year ago, with 3.5 Sonnet.
180.
by jjani 1y ago
My chats so far have been similar to yours, across the board worse than o3, never better. I've had cases where it completely misinterpreted what I was asking for, a very strange experience which I'd never had with the other fronti

More ›