Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jjallen
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
241.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
So every physics researcher should never challenge established theories and if you do you’re a crackpot? Can you make a cogent argument against one bit of her research instead of calling her a crackpot for challenging things?
242.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
If you are saying that this person is from the US, he isn’t.
243.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
How do you only have one review? This looks super cool and would make me basically immediately able to roughly play quite a few pieces. Need to setup my keyboard and try it out.
244.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
Why would this be hell? We aren't in the sky, are we? It's mostly empty there. We are on the ground. Fewer cars will be needed to deliver things. I think this is a massive improvement and will finally use an underutilized resource
245.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
> when was thr last time you saw a Walmart parking lot full? Sounds like they could make them much smaller > They make it more difficult to visit multiple stops in one trip. Instead of parking downtown, going to an appointment and gra
246.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
Operating margin is the correct pre tax number to look at. It deducts operating expenses but not interest and taxes.
247.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
Are there also articles written when a gar car catches fire though? That is the key question.
248.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
I said that because the critics would respond with the reason the article was written is because they are “new”. Everyone knows that electricity is “older” and that they actually “came out” much longer ago
249.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
This isn’t an educational article about how to drive an EV. It’s fearmongering about electric vehicles
250.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
Why is this news? Is every gas car fire reported? Is it news because electric cars are “new” as in ten years old? Or is it that the publisher just knows it will get a bunch of clicks from people that don’t like electric stuff?
251.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
It’s a sincere question. I didn’t have a point. I was surprised to see someone saying that attempting to sequester carbon for the good of the planet is a scam. Saying something is a scam implies it’s completely a scam. Equating NFTs with at
252.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
Many very very smart people are working on it. Are you saying all of these people are scammers? Are you saying that they aren’t smart for working on it because the idea itself is a scam?
253.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
After being an amateur linguist for quite a while and living in Switzerland, where everything you buy is translated into at least 3 if not more like dozens languages for toys I recently noticed a word that was the same in dozens of languag
254.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
Are you also saying that those who publish in peer reviewed journals don’t make stuff up? See the recent LK-99, Stanford president and Dan Ariely I really wish we could get over the whole idea that universities and journal have a monopoly o
255.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
They evidently made no attempt at all and want others to do the work for them
256.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
Are you saying that we should only listen/read to people who are? The first thing he says is that he’s not a linguist.
257.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
Same for me. I am learning new software languages with a fraction of the effort that was required even just one year ago. If I don’t understand something or need help I just ask and usually I get the help I need. This is especially benefici
258.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
Arguably AI and machine learning IS a trend. Just because it is ten years old does not mean it isn't a trend. A trend is a consistent increase or decrease, with no limits on duration.
259.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
Some videos are drawn out but lost aren’t. People will drop if the video gets too boring. It’s also very easy to skip in video ads or forward or reverse to the most replayed part of the video.
260.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
I'm giving them money to view fewer ads. Isn't this an inherently "anti-ad" consumer standpoint? I am telling YT/Google that I as a consumer am willing to pay money to not see ads. Am I not telling them with my wall
261.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
> YouTube Premium is NOT the way. So have 100 different Patreon subscriptions each month? The minimum pledge is $1. What if I watch 200 different YT creators? What about the short videos? Should I create a new Patreon subscription for ea
262.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
I do when I regularly watch a particular creator's videos over and over. However, this isn't the case for most of the videos I watch. Lots of one-off views.
263.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
I do that too when I really want to support someone. YouTube premium is a way to support each producers videos, not only the few that I might patronize on Patreon. There are dozens and dozens of different creators of videos that I watch eac
264.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
I just subscribe to YouTube premium to support my favorite application out there. I learn so much from the people who spend hours and hours making videos every month that I am more than happy to pay a measly $13 or whatever it is every mont
265.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
Yes 25 is very common but still more than 2x what Americans typically get
266.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
Unfortunately meddling with humans is not something that is very possible or accepted. This is one of the primary reasons we’ve made almost zero progress recently in understanding ourselves.
267.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
There’s a big difference between being immortal and not having to die at some preprogrammed time that is purely a byproduct of our evolutionary history. It’s a spectrum. We don’t know what it will take to make us healthier/love longer.
268.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
the fact that each species tends to live its own lifespan and each lifespan is somewhat unique (like not all species tend to live 10 years, for example) suggests that lifespan is genetically programmed. There are some good, obvious reasons
269.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
"Isn't there a concept similar to "no free lunch" in biology?" Is there? Is this a widely accepted scientific fact? What does this even mean? That you can't get a benefit without a cost? I thought that this phr
270.
▲
by
jjallen
3y ago
The joke is not obvious at all. This is a totally realistic scenario. Source: I live in another small but not that small of a European country.
More ›